Surface conditioning methods and polishing techniques effect on surface roughness of a feldspar ceramic

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 723-728

  Saraç, Y Şinasi ^a   Elekdag Turk, Selma ^a   Saraç, Duygu ^a   Turk, Tamer ^a  

^a ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Feldspathic porcelain; Polishing techniques; Surface conditioning; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

EID: 34447120423     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/062206-256.1     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent. 2004;32:91-99.
2. Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrman W, Özcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:540-546.
3. Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Peltomäki T, Huysmans M, Kalk W. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:220-227.
4. Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain-bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:245-252.
5. Zachrisson YØ, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:420-430.
6. Harari D, Shapira-Davis S, Gillis I, Roman I, Redlich M. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:551-554.
7. Borges GA, Sophr AM, de Goes MF, Sobrinho LC, Chan DCN. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:479-488.
8. Bessing C, Wiktorsson Å. Comparison of two different methods of polishing porcelain. Scand J Dent Res. 1983;91:482-487.
9. Kawai K, Urano M, Ebisu S. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83:664-667.
10. Huang TH, Kao CT. The shear bond strength of composite brackets on porcelain teeth. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:433-439.
11. Brewer JD, Garlapo DA, Chipps EA, Tedesco LA. Clinical discrimination between autoglazed and polished porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:631-635.
12. Winchester L. Direct orthodontic bonding to porcelain: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:299-308.
13. Eustaquio R, Garner LD, Moore BK. Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988;94:421-425.
14. Wood DP, Jordan RE, Way DC, Galil KA. Bonding to porcelain and gold. Am J Orthod. 1986;89:194-205.
15. Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:285-290.
16. Zelos L, Bevis RR, Keenan KM. Evaluation of the ceramic/ceramic interface. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:10-21.
17. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333-340.
18. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-178.
19. Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;114:387-392.
20. Thurmond JW, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:355-359.
21. Jarvis J, Zinelis S, Eliades T, Bradley TG. Porcelain surface roughness, color and gloss changes after orthodontic bonding. Angle Orthod. 2006;76:274-277.
22. Hulterstrom AK, Bergman M. Polishing systems for dental ceramics. Acta Odontol Scand. 1993;51:229-234.