Improved orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam. Part 2. Lathe-cut, admixed, and spherical amalgams with different intermediate resins

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 337-344

  Büyükyilmaz, Tamer ^a   Zachrisson, Björn U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adhesives; Amalgam; Bond strength; Bonding; Debonding

Indexed keywords

ALL BOND 2; ALL-BOND 2; AMALGAMBOND; ANA 2000; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RELIANCE; RESIN CEMENT; SILVER; TYTIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SILVER; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0032138243     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T, Zachrisson YØ. Improving orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam. Angle Orthod 1995;65:35-42.
2. Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Recent advances in bonding to gold, amalgam, and porcelain. J Clin Orthod 1993;27:661-75.
3. Büyükyilmaz T, Zachrisson BU. Orthodontic bonding to different types of amalgam: Laboratory and clinical findings. Europ J Orthodont 1996;18:407.
4. Hasegawa T, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR. A laboratory study of the Amalgambond adhesive system. Am J Dent 1992;5:181-6.
5. Staninec M, Holt M. Bonding of amalgam to tooth structure: Tensile adhesion and microleakage tests. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:397-402.
6. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1992;17:112-9.
7. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:257-60.
8. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Drost C, Can S. In-vitro-Studie zur Haftfestigkeit von Brackets auf Metallen, Keramik und Komposit. Teil 1: Kleben auf Edelmetallen und Amalgam. J Orofac Orthop/ Fortschr Kieferorthop 1996;57:76-87.
9. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Gao F, Kovarik RE. Bond strength of Panavia EX to dental amalgam. Int J Prosthod 1989;2:371-5.
10. Caughman WF, Kovarik RE, Rueggeberg FA, Snipes WB. The bond strength of Panavia EX to air-abraded amalgam. Int J Prosthod 1991;4:276-81.
11. Clinical Research Associates Newsletter 1994;18 Issue 2 (Feb.):2-3.
12. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ, Torres TJ, Avera SP. Shear bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. Int J Prosthod 1991;4:17-23.
13. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatment. Dent Mater 1991;7:118-23.
14. Zachrisson YØ, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;109:420-30.
15. Rezk-Lega F, Øgaard B. Tensile bond force of glass ionomer cements in direct bonding of orthodontic brackets: An in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991;100:357-61.
16. Øilo G. Bond strength testing - what does it mean? Int Dent J 1993;43:492-8.
17. Katona TR, Moore BK. The effects of load misalignment on tensile load testing of direct bonded orthodontic brackets - a finite element model. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;105:543-51.
18. Zachrisson BU. Bonding in orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL Jr., eds. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. 2nd edition. St.Louis: Mosby, 1994:542-626.
19. Gendusa NJ (research director, Parkell, Farmingdale, NY). Personal communication, 1994.
20. Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.
21. Bruning JL, Kintz BL. Computational handbook of statistics. Glenview: Scott, Foresman, 1977.
22. McCabe JF, Carrick TE. A statistical approach to the mechanical testing of dental materials. Dent Mater 1986;2:139-42.
23. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. Bond strengths of orthodontic bonding materials: An in-vitro study. Br J Orthod 1991;18:125-30.
24. Durning P, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. A laboratory investigation into cements used to retain orthodontic bands. Br J Orthod 1994;21:27-32.
25. Ibe D, Segner D. Verbesserung der Haftfestigkeit ortodontischer Brackets auf dentalen Vollguss-und Aufbrennlegierunggen durch Mikrosandstrahlen. Fortschr. Kieferorthop. 1995;56:110-17.
26. Sperber RL, Watson PA, Rossouw PE, Sectakof P. In vitro adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;109,108 (abstr.)
27. Cooley RL, McCourt JW, Train TE. Bond strength of resin to amalgam as affected by surface finish. Quintessence Int 1989;20:237-9.
28. Büyükyilmaz T, Zachrisson YØ, Zachrisson BU. Improving orthodontic bonding to gold alloy. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;108:510-8.
29. Draughn RA. The effect of thermal cycling on retention of composite restoratives. J Dent Res 1976;55:B137 (IADR abstr. # 303).
30. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength and durability of porcelain bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163-8.
31. Suh BI, Lamerand SD. Contact angle studies of prepared metal surfaces prior to bonding. J Dent Res 1995;74:461 (IADR abstr. # 482).
32. Llobell A, Nichols JI, Kois JC, Daly CH. Fatigue life of porcelain repair systems. Int J Prosthod 1992;5:205-13.