Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 36-42

  Coleman, Grant G ^a   Lindauer, Steven J ^b   Tüfekçi, Eser ^b   Shroff, Bhavna ^b   Best, Al M ^b  

^a Commonwealth University ^*

^b VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BODY IMAGE; CHIN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTIST; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIP; MALE; MANDIBLE; PARENT; PATIENT; PROGNATHIA; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROGNATHIA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BODY IMAGE; CHIN; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DENTISTS; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIP; MALE; MANDIBLE; PARENTS; PATIENTS; PROGNATHISM; RETROGNATHISM;

EID: 34447100923     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.025     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Downs W.B. Variations in facial relationships: their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 34 (1948) 812-840
2. Steiner C.C. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39 (1953) 729-755
3. Tweed C.H. The Frankfort-mandibular incisor angle (FMIA) in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24 (1954) 121-169
4. Burstone C.J. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod 44 (1958) 1-25
5. Burstone C.J. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 53 (1967) 262-284
6. Ricketts R.M. Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 27 (1957) 14-37
7. Ricketts R.M. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 54 (1968) 272-289
8. Peck H., and Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 40 (1970) 284-318
9. Yehezkel S., and Turley P.K. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 (2004) 407-417
10. Foster E.J. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod 43 (1973) 34-40
11. Forsberg C.M., and Odenrick L. Changes in the relationship between the lips and the aesthetic line from eight years of age to adulthood. Eur J Orthod 1 (1979) 265-270
12. Czarnecki S.T., Nanda R.S., and Currier G.F. Perceptions of a balanced profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 180-187
13. Nanda R.S., and Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1 (1995) 67-81
14. Hier L.A., Evans C.A., BeGole E.A., and Giddon D.B. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod 69 (1999) 231-238
15. Giddon D.B., Bernier D.L., Evans C.A., and Kinchen J.A. Comparison of two computer-animated imaging programs for quantifying facial profile preference. Percept Mot Skills 82 (1996) 1251-1264
16. Anderson N.K., Evans C.A., and Giddon D.B. Comparison of perceptions of computer-animated left- and right-facing profiles. J Prosthodont 8 (1999) 72-79
17. Kitay D., BeGole E.A., Evans C.A., and Giddon D.B. Computer-animated comparison of self-perception with actual profiles of orthodontic and nonorthodontic subjects. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 14 (1999) 125-134
18. Cox N.H., and Van der Linden F.P.G.M. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 60 (1971) 175-183