Effects of tool diameter variations in on-line surface roughness recognition system

Journal of Industrial Technology

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 1999, Pages

  Savage, Mandara D ^b   Chen, Joseph C ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Machine Tools; Manufacturing; Materials Processes; Quality Control; Research

Indexed keywords

SURFACE ROUGHNESS RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; TOOL DIAMETER; VIBRATION GENERATION; VIBRATION RESPONSE;

MACHINE TOOLS; MACHINING; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PROFILOMETRY; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

METAL CUTTING;

EID: 3442887817     PISSN: 08826404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Black, J.T. (1979). Flow stress model in metal cutting. Journal of Engineering for Industry, 101 (4), 403-415.
2. Chen, J.C. & Smith, R. (1997). Experimental Design and Analysis in Understanding Machining Mechanisms, Journal of Industrial Technology, Vol. 13, No. 3.
3. Coker, S.A. & Shin.Y.C. (1996). In-process Control of Surface Roughness Due to Tool Wear using a New Ultrasonic System, International Journal Machine Tools Manufacturing, Vol. 36, No. 3, p. 411.
4. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
5. Lahidji, B. (1997). Determining Deflection for Metal Turning Operations, Journal of Industrial Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2.
6. Lou, S. (1997). Development of four in-process recognition systems to predict surface roughness in end milling, Dissertation for Department of Industrial Education and technology Iowa State University, pp. 29-30.
7. Mitsui, K. (1986). In-process sensors for surface roughness and their applications, Precision Eng., 9, pp. 212-220.
8. Shin, Y.C., Oh, S.J., & Coker S.A. (1995). Surface Roughness Measure by Ultrasonic Sensing for in-process Monitoring, Journal of Engineering for Industry, Vol. 117 p.439.