Assessment of clinical practice guidelines evaluation. Scales and criteria;Valoración de escalas y criterios para la evaluación de guías de práctica clínica

Revista Espanola de Salud Publica

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 457-467

  Rico Iturrioz, Rosa ^a   Gutiérrez Ibarluzea, Iñaki ^a   Asua Batarrita, José ^a   Navarro Puerto, Ma Asunción ^b   Reyes Domínguez, Antonio ^b   Marín León, Ignacio ^b   Briones Pérez De La Blanca, Eduardo ^c  

^a Serv Eval Tecnologias Sanitarias   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE VALME   (Spain)

^c Consejería de Salud ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Health Care; Health services research; Practice Guidelines; Process Assessment (Health Care); Quality Assurance; Quality control; Standars

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; SPAIN;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 3442885105     PISSN: 11355727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Jovell AJ y Navarro-Rubio MD. Guías de Práctica Clínica. Formación Médica Continuada 1995; 2: 152-6.
2. REDEGUIAS. Informe de Evaluación de Tecnologías FIS 01/1057. ISCIII 2003. Disponible en: www.redeguias.org.
3. Fundación Salud Innovación y Sociedad. Documento de trabajo n°17: Análisis del cuestionario sobre «Implantación y utilización de guías de práctica clínica: instrumentos, recursos y redes». Proyecto Guía Salud [citado feb 2003]. Disponible en: www.fundsis.org/Actividades/publicaciones/Docu mento%20de%20trabajo%2017.pdf.
4. Littlejohns P y Cluzeau F. Guidelines for evaluation. Fam Pract 2000; 17: s3-s6.
5. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Clinical Guidelines: criteria for appraisal for national use. Edinburgh: SIGN; 1995.
6. Cluzeau F y Littlejohns P. Appraising clinical guidelines in England and Wales: The development of a methodological framework and its application to policy. Jt Comm J on Qual Improv 1999; 25: 514-521.
7. The AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREEE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 18-23.
8. Thorsen T, Mäkelä M, editores. Cambiar la Práctica de los Profesionales. Sevilla: Agencia de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias de Andalucía, AETSA; 2002.
9. Shaneyfelt TM, Mayo-Smith MF y Rothwangl J. Are Guidelines Following Guidelines? The methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Peer Reviewed Medical Literature. JAMA 1999; 281(20): 1900-1905.
10. Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw J y Feder G. Appraisal instrument for clinical guidelines. St George's Hospital Medical School. London: 1997.
11. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). A Guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Camberra; 1998.
12. Field MJ, Lohr KN, editors. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: from development to use. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press; 1992.
13. Wilson MC, Hayward RS, Tunis SR, Bass EB y Guyatt G: for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to Use Clinical Practice Guidelines. A. Are the recomendations valid? JAMA 1995; 274(7): 570-574.
14. Wilson MC, Hayward RS, Tunis SR, Bass EB y Guyatt G: for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users guides to the medical literature. VIII. What are the recomendations and will they help you in caring for your patients? JAMA 1995; 274(20): 1630-1632.
15. Alberta Clinical Practice Guidelines. Evaluation framework for the clinical practice guidelines program. Prepared by Howard Research and Instructional systems. Inc. January 2002.
16. Battista R y Hodge MJ. Setting priorities and selecting topics for clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1995; 159: 1233-7.
17. Davis DA y Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice: A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997; 157: 408-15.
18. Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw J, Feder G y Moran S. Development and application of a generic methodology to assess the quality of clinical guidelines. Int J Qual Health Care 1999; 11: 21-8.
19. Agency for Quality in Medicine Joint Institution of the German Medical Association and the National Association of the Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (ÄZQ). Checklist «Methodological Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines». 2nd version (8/1999) Valid until 02/28/2003 [citado sept. 2002]. Disponible en: www.azq.de www.leitlinen.de.
20. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. NICE. The Guideline Development Process - Information for National Collaborating Centres and Guideline Development Groups. N0040; 2001.
21. Field MJ, Lohr KN, editores. Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical Practice Guidelines: directions for a new Program. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1990.
22. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Tools for Guideline Development and Evaluation 2002 [citado sept 2002]. Disponible en: www.nzgg.org.nz/tools/ adaptation.cfm.
23. National Guideline Clearinghouse. AHRQ [citado sept 2002]. Disponible en: www.ahcpr.gov/clinic/cpgsix.htm.
24. Pilote L y Tager IB. Outcomes research in the development and evaluation of practice guidelines. BMC Health Serv Res 2002;2:7 [citado sept 2002]. Disponible en: www.biomedcentral.com
25. Shiffman RN, Shekelle P, Overhage M, Slutsky P, Grinshaw J y Deshpandre AM. Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the conference on guidelines standardization. Ann Intern Med. 2003; 139: 493-8.
26. Graham ID, Calder LA, Hebert PC, Carter AO, Tetroe JM. A comparison of clinical practice guideline appraisal instruments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000; 16: 1024-38.
27. Calderón Sandubete E, Cotos Cancas R, Marín León I, Briones Pérez de la Blanca E, Pérez Cano B, Grilo Reina A y Grupo CAMBIE. Mapa de evidencias para el tratamiento de la angina inestable en la cabecera del paciente. Etapa preliminar para el desarrollo de una guía de práctica clínica. Med Clin (Barc) 2000; 114 (Supl)2: 19-23.
28. Choudhry NK, Stelfox HT y Detsky AS. Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry. JAMA 2002; 287: 612-17.
29. Burgers JS, Cluzeau FA, Hanna SE, Hunt C y Grol R. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003; 19: 148-56.
30. Marzó M, Alonso P y Bonfill X. Guías de práctica clínica en España. Med Clin (Barc) 2002; 118(Supl 3): 30-5.
31. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I et al. Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los ensayos clínicos aleatorios controlados. Recomendaciones del grupo de trabajo CONSORT. Rev Esp Salud Pública 1998; 72 (1): 5-11.
32. Moher D, Schulz KF y Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recomendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized-trials. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 657-62.
33. Rodríguez Artalejo F y Guallar Castillón P. Sobre los meta-análisis y el QUOROM. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2000; 74 (2): 103-5.
34. Moher D J Cook, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Mejora de la calidad de los informes de los metaanálisis de los ensayos clínicos controlados: el acuerdo QUOROMD. Rev Esp Salud Pública 2000; 74 (2): 107-18.