The fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnostic criteria of proliferative breast lesions: A retrospective statistical analysis of criteria for papillomas and radial scar lesions

Diagnostic Cytopathology

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 386-397

  Field, Andrew ^a   Mak, Alison ^a  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Epithelial hyperplasia with atypia; Papillary fragments; Papilloma; Radial scar; Stellate meshwork fragments

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BREAST HYPERPLASIA; BREAST LESION; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FOLLOW UP; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCAR FORMATION; SCLEROSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS;

BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; BREAST DISEASES; CICATRIX; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERPLASIA; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34347370849     PISSN: 87551039     EISSN: 10970339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dc.20652     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Sneige N, Staerkel GA. Fine-needle aspiration cytology of ductal hyperplasia with and without atypia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Human Pathol 1994;25:485-492.
2. Lieberman L, Cohen MA, Dershaw DP, Abramson AF, et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed as stereotactic core biopsy of breast lesions: An indication for surgical biopsy. AJR 1995;164:1111-1113.
3. Schnitt SJ, Connolley JL, Tavassoli FA, Fechner RE, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of proliferative breast lesions using standardized criteria. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:1133-1143.
4. Page DL, Dupont WD. Anatomic indicators (histologic and cytologic) of increased breast-cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1993;28:157-166.
5. Mak A, Field AS. The positive predictive value of the breast FNAB diagnoses of epithelial hyperplasia with atypia, papilloma and radial scar. Diagn Cytopathology 2006;34:818-823.
6. Orell SR. Radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion - A problem in the diagnostic work-up of screen-detected breast lesions. Cytopathol 1999;10:250-258.
7. Nayar R, De Frias DV, Bourtsos EP, Sutton V, et al. Cytologic differential diagnosis of papillary pattern in breast aspirates: Correlation with histology. Ann Diagn Pathol 2001;5:34-42.
8. Dawson AE, Mulford DK. Benign versus malignant papillary neoplasms of the breast. Diagnostic clues in fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1994;38:23-28.
9. Maygarden SJ, Novotny DB, Johnson DE, Frable WJ. Subclassification of benign breast disease by fine needle aspiration cytology. Comparison of cytologic and histologic findings in 265 palpable breast masses. Acta Cytol 1994;38:115-129.
10. Ku NNK, Mela N, Cox CE, Reintgen DS, et al. Diagnostic pitfalls in aspiration biopsy cytology of papillary breast lesions. Cancer Control 1997;4:451-457.
11. Gomez-Aracil V, Mayayo E, Azua J, Arraiza A. Papillary neoplasms of the breast: Clues in fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathol 2002;13:22-30.
12. Michael CW, Buschmann B. Can true papillary neoplasms of breast and their mimickers be accurately classified by cytology? Cancer Cytopathol 2002;96:92-100.
13. Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN-I, Whitaker D, et al. Breast. Manual and atlas of fine needle aspiration cytology. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p 146-199.
14. Tavassoli FA. Papillary lesions. Pathology of the breast. Stamford: Appleton & Lange; 1999. p 325-372.
15. Thomas PA, Raab SS, Cohen MB. Is the fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of proliferative breast disease feasible? Diagn Cytopathol 1994;7:301-306.
16. Stanley MW, Henry-Stanley MJ, Zera R. Atypia in breast fine-needle aspiration smears correlates poorly with the presence of a prognostically significant proliferative lesion of ductal epithelium. Human Pathol 1993;24:630-635.
17. Lamb J, McGoogan E. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast in invasive carcinoma of tubular type and in radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions. Cytopathology 1994;5:17-26.
18. Bonzanini M, Gilioli E, Brancato B, Pellegrini M, et al. Cytologic features of 22 radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast, three of which associated with carcinoma: Clinical, mammographic, and histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:353-362.
19. Masood S, Loya A, Khalbuss W. Is core biopsy superior to fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of papillary breast lesions? Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:329-334.
20. Masood S, Frykberg ER, McLellan GL, Dee S, et al. Cytologic differentiation between proliferative and nonproliferative breast disease in mammographically guided fine-needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:581-590.
21. Silverman JF, Masood S, Ducatman BS, Wang H, et al. Can FNA biopsy separate atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, and invasive carcinoma of the breast? Cytomorphologic criteria and limitations in diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1993;9:713-728.
22. Frost AR, Tabbara SO, Poprocky LA, Weiss H, et al. Cytologic features of proliferative breast disease. A study designed to minimize sampling error. Cancer 2000;90:33-40.
23. Sidawy MK, Stoler MH, Frable WJ, Frost AR, et al. Interobserver variability in the classification of proliferative breast lesions by FNA: Results of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Study. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:150-165.
24. Bofin AM, Lydersen S, Hagmar BM. Cytological criteria for the diagnosis of intraductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;31:207-215.
25. Carder PJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast - Time for a rethink? Cytopathol 2004;15:336-337.
26. Liao J, Davey DD, Warren G, Davis J, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy remains a valid approach in the evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2004;30: 325-331.
27. Kanhoush R, Jorda M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Wang H, et al. 'Atypical' and 'suspicious' diagnoses in breast aspiration cytology. Is there a need for two categories? Cancer Cytopathol 2004;102:164-167.
28. Subcommittees National Cancer Institute FNA of Breast Workshop. The uniform approach to breast FNAB. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16: 295-311.
29. Simsir A, Waisman J, Thorner K, Cangiarella J. Mammary lesions diagnosed as "papillary" by aspiration biopsy. 70 cases with follow-up. Cancer Cytopathol 2003;99:156-165.
30. Hanby AM, Millis RR, Oberman HA. The breast. Diagnostic surgical pathology. Philadelphia; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p 319-388.
31. Ellis IO, Elston CW, Pinder SE. Papillary lesions. Systemic Pathology, Vol. 13. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1998. p 133-146.
32. Choi YD, Gong GY, Kim MJ, Lee JS, et al. Clincal and cytologic features of papillary neoplasms of the breast. Acta Cytol 2006;50: 35-40.
33. Coghill S. Breast. Diagnostic cytopathology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p 227-269.
34. Ellis IO, Pinder SE, Lee AH, Elston CW. A critical appraisal of existing classification systems of epithelial hyperplasia and in situ neoplasm of the breast with proposals for future methods of categorization: Where are we going? Sem Diagn Pathol 1999;16:202-208.
35. Greenberg ML, Camaris C, Psarianos T, Ung OA, et al. Is there a role for fine-needle aspiration in radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast? Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:537-542.
36. Ung OA, Lee WB, Greenberg ML, Bilous M. Complex sclerosing lesion: The lesion is complex, the management is straightforward. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:35-40.
37. Bondeson L, Lindholm K. Prediction of invasiveness by aspiration cytology applied to nonpalpable breast carcinoma and tested in 300 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:315-320.