Promotion and tenure: Clinical faculty at schools of pharmacy in Canada

Pharmacy Education

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 267-274

  Austin, Zubin ^a   Gregory, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; CANADA; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CLINICAL PHARMACY; EMPLOYABILITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SCHOOL; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PHARMACIST; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TEACHER;

EID: 34347342820     PISSN: 15602214     EISSN: 14772701     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15602210600911916     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Anderson, R. J., D'Souza, M., Grapes, Z. T., Kavula, M. and Miller, S. W. (1998) Promotion and tenure-do criteria and process differ?. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62:3, p. 354.
2. Barnett, C. W. and Matthews, H. W. (1998) Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 62:4, pp. 388-391.
3. Harm, L. S. (1983) Another perspective on promotion, tenure, and retention. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 47:4, pp. 353-356.
4. Popovich, N. G. and Abel, S. R. (2002) The need for a broadened definition of faculty scholarship and creativity. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 66:1, pp. 59-65.
5. Wolfgang, A. P., Gupchup, G. V. and Plake, K. S. (1995) Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: Perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 59:4, pp. 342-347.