Periodontal tissue response to coverage of root cavities restored with resin materials: A histomorphometric study in dogs

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1075-1082

  Martins, Thiago M ^a   Bosco, Alvaro F ^a   Nóbrega, Fernando J O ^a   Nagata, Maria J H ^a   Garcia, Valdir G ^a   Fucini, Stephen E ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Animals; Dental materials; Healing; Regeneration

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMATERIAL; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; GLASS IONOMER; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; DENTAL CARIES; DOG; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; TOOTH ROOT; WOUND HEALING;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DOGS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; PERIODONTAL ATTACHMENT LOSS; PERIODONTAL DISEASES; POLYURETHANES; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH ROOT; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 34347338520     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2007.060457     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. McGuire MK. Soft tissue augmentation of previously restored root surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:570-581.
2. Camargo PM, Lagos RA, Lekovic V, Wolinsky LE. Soft tissue root coverage as treatment for cervical abrasion and caries. Gen Dent 2001;49:299-304.
3. Alkan A, Keskiner I, Yuzbasioglu E. Connective tissue grafting on resin ionomer in localized gingival recession. J Periodontol 2006;77:1446-1451.
4. Mitre SB. Adhesion to dentin and physical properties of a light-cured glass ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991;70:72-74.
5. Sotres LS, Van Huysen G, Gilmore HW. A histologic study of gingival tissue response to amalgam, silicate and resin restorations. J Periodontol 1969;40:543-546.
6. Blank LW, Caffesse RG, Charbeneau GT. The gingival response to well-finished composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:626-632.
7. Peltola M, Salo T, Oikarinen K. Toxic effects of various retrograde root filling materials on gingival fibroblasts and rat sarcoma cells. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992;8: 120-124.
8. Chong BS, Owadally ID, Pitt Ford TR, Wilson RF. Cytotoxicity of potential retrogade root-filling materials. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:129-133.
9. De Grood ME, Oguntebi BR, Cunningham CJ, Pink R. A comparison of tissue reactions to Ketac-Fil and amalgam. J Endod 1995;21:65-69.
10. Brentegani LG, Bombonato KF, Carvalho TL. Histological evaluation of the biocompatibility of a glass ionomer cement in rat alveolus. Biomaterials 1997;18: 137-140.
11. Tassery H, Remusat M, Koubi G, Pertot WJ. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of Vitremer and Super EBA by implantation into the mandible of rabbits. Oral $urg Oral Meal Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:602-608.
12. Lucksanasombool P, Higgs WA, Higgs RJ, Swain MV, Howlett CR. Effects of glass ionomer cements on bone tissue. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2002;13:203-210.
13. Fahl N Jr., Denehy GE, Jackson RD. Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth with composite resins. Oral Health 1998; 88:15-22.
14. Donaldson D. The etiology of gingival recession associated with temporary crowns. J Periodontol 1974;45: 468-471.
15. Valderhaug J. Periodontal conditions and caries lesions following the insertion of fixed prostheses: A 10-year follow-up study. Int Dent J 1980;30:296-304.
16. Parma-Benfenati S, Fugazzotto PA, Ruben MP. The effect of restorative margins on the postsurgical development and nature of the periodontium. Part I. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1985;5(6):30-51.
17. Ingber JS, Rose LF, Cosier JG. The biologic width - A concept in periodontics and restorative dentistry. Alpha Omegan 1977; 70:62-65.
18. Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 1961;32:261-267.
19. Pama-Benfenati S, Fugazzotto PA, Ferreira PM, Ruben MD, Kramer GM. The effect of restorative margins on the postsurgical development and nature of the periodontium. Part II. Anatomical considerations. Int Periodontics Restorative Dent 1986;6(1):64-75.
20. Tal H, Soldinger M, Dreiangel A, Pitaru S. Periodontal response to long-term abuse of the gingival attachment by supracrestal amalgam restorations. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:654-659.
21. Jansson L, Ehnevid H, Lindskog S, Blomlof L. Proximal restorations and periodontal status. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:577-582.
22. Gunay H, Seeger A, Tschemitschek H, Geurtsen W. Placement of the preparation line and periodontal health - A prospective 2-year clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:171-181.
23. Dragoo MR. Resin ionomer and hybrid-ionomer cements: Part II: Human clinical and histologic wound healing, responses in specific periodontal lesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:75-87.
24. Larato DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:402-404.
25. Van Dijken JWV, Sjöström S. Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:180-183.
26. Konradsson K, Van Dijken JW. Interleukin-1 levels in gingival crevicular fluid adjacent to restorations of calcium aluminate cement and resin composite. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:462-466.
27. Gomes SC, Miranda LA, Soares I, Oppermann RV. Clinical and histologic evaluation of the periodontal response to restorative procedures in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:39-47.
28. Wolfson EM, Seltzer S. Reaction of rat connective tissue to some gutta-percha formulations. J Endod 1975;1:395-402.
29. Paolantonio M, D'Ercole S, Perinetti G, et al. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. 1-year results. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:200-207.
30. Vandewalle KS, Vigil G. Guidelines for the restoration of Class V lesions. Gen Dent 1997;45:254-260.
31. Waerhaug J. Effect of rough surfaces upon gingival tissues. J Dent Res 1956;35:323-325.
32. Lewis J, Nixis L, Schuster G, Lefebvre C, Knoernschild K, Caughman G. Response of oral mucosa cells to glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1996;17:1115-1120.
33. Oliva A, Della Ragione F, Salerno A, et al. Biocompatibility studies on glass ionomer cements by primary cultures of human osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1996;17: 1351-1356.
34. Wikesjö UM, Nilvéus R. Periodontal repair in dogs: Healing patterns in large circumferential periodontal defects. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:49-59.
35. Urbani G, Lombardo G, Castellarin M, Santi E, Abitbol T. Surgical correction of gingival recessions associated with radicular carious lesions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:330-340.
36. Ruben MP, Schulman SM, Kon S. Healing of periodontal surgical wounds. In: Goldman HM, Cohen DW, eds. Periodontal Therapy. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company; 1973:875-961.
37. Goldstein M, Nasatzky E, Goultschin J, Boyan B, Schwartz Z. Coverage of carious roots by a subepithelial connective tissue graft. Am J Dent 2002;15: 143-148.