Connective tissue grafting on resin ionomer in localized gingival recession

Journal of Periodontology

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1446-1451

  Alkan, Arzu ^a   Keskiner, Ilker ^b   Yuzbasioglu, Emir ^b  

^a ERCIYES UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Connective tissue; Gingival recession; Glass ionomer cement; Grafts

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GINGIVA DISEASE; HUMAN; PERIODONTAL EXAMINATION; PERIODONTICS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TISSUE FLAP; TISSUE GRAFT; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT; TREATMENT PLANNING; GINGIVA; GINGIVOPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; RETREATMENT; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADULT; CONNECTIVE TISSUE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FEMALE; GINGIVA; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GINGIVOPLASTY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; RETREATMENT; ROOT CARIES; ROOT RESORPTION;

EID: 33748534172     PISSN: 00223492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060021     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agudio G, Pini Prato G, Cortellini P, Parma S. Gingival lesions caused by improper oral hygiene measures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1987;7(1):52-65.
2. Khocht A, Simon G, Person P, Denepitiya JL. Gingival recession in relation to history of hard toothbrush use. J Periodontol 1993;64:900-905.
3. Trossello VK, Gianelly AA. Orthodontic treatment and periodontal status. J Periodontol 1979;50:665-671.
4. Steiner GG, Pearson JK, Ainamo J. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 1981;52:314-320.
5. Boyd RL. Mucogingival considerations and their relationship to orthodontics. J Periodontol 1978;49:67-76.
6. Donaldson D. Gingival recession associated with temporary crowns. J Periodontol 1973;44:691-696.
7. Turner CH. A retrospective study of the fit of jacket crowns placed around gold posts and cores, and the associated gingival health. J Oral Rehabil 1982;9:427-434.
8. Contreras A, Slots J. Active cytomegalovirus infection in human periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1998; 13:225-230.
9. Buckley LA. The relationships between malocclusion, gingival inflammation, plaque and calculus. J Periodontol 1981;52:35-40.
10. Ingervall B, Jacobsson U, Nyman S. A clinical study of the relationship between crowding of teeth, plaque and gingival condition. J Clin Periodontol 1977;4:214-222.
11. Seichter U. Root surface caries: A critical literature review. J Am Dent Assoc 1987;115:305-310.
12. Hellyer PH, Beighton D, Heath MR, Lynch EJ. Root caries in older people attending a general dental practice in East Sussex. Br Dent J 1990;169:201-206.
13. DePaola PF, Soparkar PM, Tavares M, Kent RL Jr. Clinical profiles of individuals with and without root surface caries. Gerodontology 1989;8:9-15.
14. Leske GS, Ripa LW. Three-year root caries increments: Implications for clinical trials. J Public Health Dent 1989;49:142-146.
15. Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the "envelope" technique. J Periodontol 1985;56:397-402.
16. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol 1985; 56:715-720.
17. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with guided tissue regeneration utilizing a bioabsorbable membrane versus the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68:779-790.
18. Nelson SW. The subpedicle connective tissue graft. A bilaminar reconstructive procedure for the coverage of denuded root surfaces. J Periodontol 1987;58:95-102.
19. Harris RJ. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol 1992;63:477-486.
20. Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME, Gray JL, Richardson AC. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage. J Periodontol 1993;64:315-322.
21. Paolantonio M, di Murro C, Cattabriga A, Cattabriga M. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus free gingival graft in the coverage of exposed root surfaces. A 5-year clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:51-56.
22. Harris RJ. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: Guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. Results of a series of consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1998;69:1426-1434.
23. Trombelli L, Scabbia A, Tatakis DN, Calura G. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:1271-1277.
24. Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:138-145.
25. Muller HP, Stahl M, Eger T. Root coverage employing an envelope technique or guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable membrane. J Periodontol 1999; 70:743-751.
26. Borghetti A, Glise JM, Monnet-Corti V, Dejou J. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol 1999;70:123-130.
27. Dragoo MR. Resin-ionomer and hybrid-ionomer cements: Part II, human clinical and histologic wound healing responses in specific periodontal lesions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:75-87.
28. Scherer W, Dragoo MR. New subgingival restorative procedures with Geristore resin ionomer. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:1-4.
29. White C Jr. Repair of a root resorption lesion. A case report. J Periodontol 1998;69:596-600.
30. Breault LG, Fowler EB, Primack PD. Endodontic perforation repair with resin-ionomer: A case report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2000;1:48-59.
31. Anderegg CR. The treatment of class III maxillary furcations using a resin-ionomer. A case report. J Periodontol 1998;69:948-950.
32. Fowler EB, Breault LG. Failure of resin ionomers in the retention of multi-rooted teeth with class III furcation involvement: A rebuttal case report. J Periodontol 2001;72:1084-1091.
33. Alhadainy HA. Root perforations. A review of literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:368-374.
34. Duggins LD, Clay JR, Himel VT, Dean JW. A combined endodontic retrofill and periodontal guided tissue regeneration technique for the repair of molar endodontic furcation perforations: Report of a case. Quintessence Int 1994;25:109-114.
35. Petersson K, Hasselgren G, Tronstad L. Endodontic treatment of experimental root perforations in dog teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:22-28.
36. Mannocci F, Vichi A, Ferrari M. Sealing ability of several restorative materials used for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1997;23:639-641.
37. Bogaerts P. Treatment of root perforations with calcium hydroxide and SuperEBA cement: A clinical report. Int Endod J 1997;30:210-219.
38. El Deeb ME, El Deeb M, Tabibi A, Jensen JR. An evaluation of the use of amalgam, Cavit, and calcium hydroxide in the repair of furcation perforations. J Endod 1982;8:459-466.
39. Himel VT, Brady J Jr., Weir J Jr. Evaluation of repair of mechanical perforations of the pulp chamber floor using biodegradable tricalcium phosphate or calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1985;11:161-165.
40. Lemon RR. Nonsurgical repair of perforation defects. Internal matrix concept. Dent Clin North Am 1992; 36:439-457.
41. Alhadainy HA, Himel VT. An in vitro evaluation of plaster of Paris barriers used under amalgam and glass ionomer to repair furcation perforations. J Endod 1994; 20:449-452.
42. Silness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-135.
43. Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21:533-551.
44. Goldstein M, Nasatzky E, Goultschin J, Boyan BD, Schwartz Z. Coverage of previously carious roots is as predictable a procedure as coverage of intact roots. J Periodontol 2002;73:1419-1426.
45. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972; 132:133-135.
46. McLean JW. Glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J 1988;164:293-300.
47. Sasanaluckit P, Albustany KR, Doherty PJ, Williams DF. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1993;14:906-916.
48. el Mallakh BF, Sarkar NK. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements in de-ionized water and artificial saliva. Dent Mater 1990;6:118-122.
49. Harris RJ. Treatment of a cracked tooth with a resin-ionomer restoration and a connective tissue graft: A case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20:612-617.
50. Goldman HM, Cohen DW. Periodontal Therapy, 5th ed. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby; 1973:715-758.
51. Matter J, Cimasoni G. Creeping attachment after free gingival grafts. J Periodontol 1976;47:574-579.
52. Matter J. Creeping attachment of free gingival grafts. A five-year follow-up study. J Periodontol 1980;51: 681-685.
53. Bell LA, Valluzzo TA, Garnick JJ, Pennel BM. The presence of "creeping attachment" in human gingiva. J Periodontol 1978; 49:513-517.
54. Harris RJ. Creeping attachment associated with the connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft. J Periodontol 1997;68:890-899.