Maternal syphilis and intimate partner violence in Bolivia: A gender-based analysis of implications for partner notification and universal screening

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Volumn 34, Issue 7 SUPPL., 2007, Pages

  Díaz Olavarrieta, Claudia ^a   García, Sandra G ^a   Feldman, Becca Seitchik ^b   Polis, Alberto Martinez ^a   Revollo, Rita ^c   Tinajeros, Freddy ^c   Grossman, Daniel ^d  

^a POPULATION COUNCIL   (Mexico)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Population Council   (Bolivia)

^d IBIS REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BOLIVIA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SYPHILIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BOLIVIA; CHILD; CONTACT TRACING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISEASE TRANSMISSION, VERTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS, INFECTIOUS; SPOUSE ABUSE; SYPHILIS; SYPHILIS, CONGENITAL;

EID: 34347333470     PISSN: 01485717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.olq.0000261725.79965.af     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Singh AE, Romanowski B. Syphilis: Review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiological, and some biological features. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999; 12:187-209.
2. Walker DG, Walker GIA. Forgotten buy not gone: The continuing scourge of congenital syphilis. Lancet Inf Dis 2002; 2:243-246.
3. Schmid G. Economic and programmatic aspects of congenital syphilis prevention. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82:402-409.
4. Hawkes S, Miller S, Reichenbach L, et al. Antenatal syphilis control: people, programmes, policies, and politics. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82:417-423.
5. Temmerman M, Gichangi P, Fonck K, et al. Declining syphilis prevalence in pregnant women in Nairobi since 1995: Another success story in the STD field? Int J STD AIDS 1999; 10:405-408.
6. Reiss IL. Premarital Sexual Standards in America. New York: The Free Press; 1960.
7. Sprecher S, Mckinney K, Orbuch TL. Has the double standard disappeared? An experimental test. Social Psychol Quart 1987; 50:24-31.
8. Sheeran P, Spears R, Abraham SCS, et al. Religiosity, gender, and the double standard. J Psychol 1996; 130:23-33.
9. World Health Organization. Setting the Research Agenda on Violence Against Women and HIV/AIDS, October 23-25, 2000.
10. Campbell J, Jacquelyn C. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002; 359:1331-1336.
11. Koenig LJ, Moore J. Women, violence, and HIV: A critical evaluation with implications for HIV services. Matern Child Health J 2000; 4:103-109.
12. Morrison A. Addressing gender-based violence in the Latin America and Caribbean region: A critical review of interventions. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3438, October 2004.
13. World Health Organization. WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization.
14. International Planned Parenthood Federation. Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines on Domestic Violence. March 1992.
15. Measure DHS, 2004: 2003 Encuesta Nacional de Demografía y Salud. La Paz: Measure Demographic Health Survey, November, 2004. Available at: http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FR159/00FrontMatter.pdf. Accessed February 6, 2007.
16. Atlas.ti [computer program]. Version 5.0. Technical University of Berlin, 1989.
17. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. USA: SAGE; 1998.