Agreement between two non-contact specular microscopes: Topcon SP2000P versus Rhine-Tec [3]

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 91, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 979-980

  Thuret, Gilles ^a   Deb Joardar, Nilanjana ^a   Zhao, Min ^a   Gain, Philippe ^a   Gavet, Yann ^b   Nguyen, Frederic ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ JEAN MONNET   (France)

^b ECOLE DES MINES DE SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CALCULATION; CATARACT; CELL DENSITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; HUMAN; IMAGING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT; MICROSCOPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SPECULAR MICROSCOPY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CELL COUNT; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34347326192     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.099374     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Cheung SW, Cho P. Endothelial cells analysis with the Topcon specular microscope SP-2000P and IMAGEnet system. Curr Eye Res 2000;21:788-98.
2. van Schaick W, van Dooren BT, Mulder PG, et al. Validity of endothelial cell analysis methods and recommendations for calibration in Topcon SP-2000P specular microscopy. Cornea 2005;24:538-44.
3. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
4. Vecchi M, Braccio L, Orsoni JG. The Topcon SP 1000 and IMAGEnet systems. A comparison of four methods for evaluating corneal endothelial cell density. Cornea 1996;15:271-7.