Interests, folk psychology and the sociology of scientific knowledge

Philosophical Explorations

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 265-279

  Ylikoski, Petri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34347288256     PISSN: 13869795     EISSN: 17415918     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1386979042000258358     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. BARNES, BARRY. 1977. Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2. BARNES, BARRY. 1982. T.S. Kuhn and social science. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. BARNES, BARRY. 1985. About science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
4. BARNES, BARRY and DONALD MACKENZIE. 1979. On the role of interest in scientific change. Sociological Review Monograph 27: 49-66.
5. BARNES, BARRY, DAVID BLOOR, and JOHN HENRY. 1996. Scientific knowledge. A sociological analysis. London: Athlone Press.
6. BIAGIOLI, MARIO. 1993. Galileo Courtier. The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
7. BOURDIEU, PIERRE. 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 14: 19-47.
8. BROWN, JAMES ROBERT. 1989. The rational and the social. London: Routledge.
9. CALLON, MICHEL and JOHN LAW. 1982. On interests and their transformation: Enrolment and counter-enrolment. Social Studies of Science 12: 615-25.
10. FUCHS, STEPHAN. 1992. The professional quest for truth. A social theory of science and knowledge. New York: SUNY.
11. GIERE, RONALD N. 1988. Explaining science. A cognitive approach. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
12. GIERYN, THOMAS P. 1999. Cultural boundaries of science. Credibility on the line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13. GILBERT, NIGEL and MICHAEL MULKAY. 1984. Opening Pandora's box. A sociological analysis of scientists’ discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. HABERMAS, jOrgen. 1972. Knowledge and human interests. London: Heinemann.
15. HIRSCHMAN, ALBERT O. 1977. The passions and the interests. Political arguments for capitalism before its triumph. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
16. HULL, DAVID L. 1988. Science as a process. An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
17. KIM, KYUNG-MAN. 1994. Explaining scientific consensus. The case of Mendelian genetics. New York: The Guilford Press.
18. LATOUR, BRUNO. 1987. Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
19. LATOUR, BRUNO and STEVE WOOLGAR. 1986. Laboratory Life. The construction of scientific facts. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
20. LAUDAN, LARRY. 1981. The pseudo-science of science? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11:173-98.
21. LEGRAND, H. E. 1988. Drifting continents and shifting theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. LENOIR, TIMOTHY. 1997. Instituting science. The cultural production of scientific disciplines. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
23. LYNCH, MICHAEL. 1993. Scientific practice and ordinary action. Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. MACKENZIE, DONALD. 1981. Statistics in Britain 1865-1930. The social construction of scientific knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
25. MACKENZIE, DONALD. 1990. Inventing accuracy. A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
26. MYERS, MILTON L. 1983. The soul of modern economic man. Ideas of self-interest: Thomas Hobbes to Adam Smith. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
27. PICKERING, ANDREW. 1995. The mangle of practice. Time, agency & science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
28. RESNIK, DAVID. 1998. Conflicts of interest in science. Perspectives on Science 6: 381–408.
29. ROTH, PAULA. 1996. Will the real scientists please stand up? Dead ends and live issues in the explanation of scientific knowledge. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 27: 43-68.
30. RUDWICK, MARTIN. 1985. The great Devonian controversy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
31. SAPP, JAN. 1987. Beyond the gene. Cytoplasmic inheritance and the struggle for authority in genetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. SHAPIN, STEVEN. 1979. The politics of observation: Cerebral anatomy and social interests in the Edinburgh phrenology disputes. Sociological Review Monograph 27: 139-78.
33. SHAPIN, STEVEN. 1988. Following scientists around. Social Studies of Science 18: 533-50.
34. SHAPIN, STEVEN. 1992. Discipline and bounding: The history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate. History of Science 30: 333-69.
35. SHAPIN, STEVEN and SIMON SCHAFFER. 1985. Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
36. SEGERSTRALE, ULLICA. 2000. Defenders of the truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. TAMMI, TIMO. 1999. On experimental discourse in economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29: 62-89.
38. WHITLEY, RICHARD. 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39. WOOLGAR, STEVE. 1981. Interests and explanation in the social study of science. Social Studies of Science 11: 365-94.
40. YEARLEY, STEVEN. 1982. The relationship between epistemological and sociological cognitive interests: Some ambiguities underlying the use of interest theory in the study of scientific knowledge. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 13: 353-88.
41. YLIKOSKI, PETRI. 2001. Understanding interests and causal explanation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Helsinki. Available from http://ethesis.helsinki.fi/julkaisut/val/kayta/vk/ylikoski
42. YLIKOSKI, PETRI. 2003. Explaining practices. Protosociology 18: 316-30.