Wise use of statistical tools in ecological field studies

Folia Geobotanica

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 123-140

  Økland, Rune Halvorsen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Hypothesis testing; Hypothetico deductive method; Inductive method; Modelling; Random sampling; Spatial structure; Statistical testing

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; RESEARCH; SAMPLING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 34347266454     PISSN: 12119520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02893879     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. APPLEGATE R.D. (1999): Diversity and natural history observation in ecology. Oikos 87: 587-588.
2. AUSTIN M.PA (1981): Permanent quadrats: an interface for theory and practice. Vegetatio 46-47: 1-10.
3. BAKKER J.P., OLFF H., WILLEMS J.H. & ZOBEL M. (1996): Why do we need permanent plots in the study of long-term vegetation dynamics? J. Veg. Sci. 7: 147-156.
4. BERGERON Y. & DANSEREAU P.-R. (1993): Predicting the composition of Canadian southern boreal forest in different fire cycles. J. Veg. Sci. 4: 827-832.
5. BONET A. & PAUSAS J.G. (2004): Species richness and cover along a 60-year chronosequence in old-fields of southeastern Spain. Pl. Ecol. 174: 257-270.
6. CRAWLEY M.J.A. (2002): Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. Wiley, Chichester.
7. DAHL E. (1957): Rondane: Mountain vegetation in South Norway and its relation to the environment. Skr. Norske Vidensk.-Akad. Oslo, Mat -Naturvidensk. Kl. 1956: 3: 1-374.
8. DIXON P.M., ELLISON A.M. & GOTELLI N.J. (2005): Improving the precision of estimates of the frequency of rare events. Ecology 86: 1114-1123.
9. DUNGAN J.L., PERRY J.N., DALE M.R.T., LEGENDRE P., CITRON-POUSTY S., FORTIN M.-J., JAKOMULSKA A., MIRITI M. & ROSENBERG M.S. (2002): A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis. Ecography 25: 626-640.
10. DUTILLEUL P. (1993): Modifying the t-test for assessing the correlation between two spatial processes. Biometrics 49: 305-314.
11. EILERTSEN O. (1991): Vegetation patterns and structuring processes in coastal shell-beds at Akerøya, Hvaler, SE Norway. Sommerfeltia 12: 1-90.
12. FOSTER B.L. & TILMAN D. (2000): Dynamic and static views of succession: Testing the descriptive power of the chronosequence approach. Pl. Ecol. 146: 1-10.
13. FRANSSON S. (1972): Myrvegetation i sydvästra Värmland (Mire vegetation in SW Värmland). Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 57: 1-133.
14. GJÆREVOLL O. (1956): The plant communities of the Scandinavian alpine snow-beds. Kongel. Norske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr. (Trondheim) 1956: 1: 1-405.
15. HALVORSEN R. (1980): Numerical analysis and successional relationships of shell-bed vegetation at Akeroya, Hvaler, SE Norway. Norweg. J. Bot. 27: 71-95.
16. HARPER K.A., BERGERON Y., DRAPEAU P., GAUTHIER S. & DE GRANDPRÉ L. (2005): Structural development following fire in black spruce boreal forest. Forest Ecol. Managem. 206: 293-306.
17. HASTIE T., TIBSHIRANI R. & FRIEDMAN J. (2001): The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York.
18. HEEGAARD E. (2002): A model of alpine species distribution in relation to snowmelt time and altitude. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 493-504.
19. HURLBERT S.H. (1984): Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol. Monogr. 54: 187-211.
20. HURLBERT S.H. (2004): On misinterpretation of pseudoreplication and related matters: A reply to Oksanen. Oikos 104: 591-597.
21. JONSSON B.G. & MOEN J. (1998): Patterns in species associations in plant communities: The importance of scale. J. Veg. Sci. 9: 327-332.
22. KENT M. & BALLLARD J. (1988): Trends and problems in the application of classification and ordination methods in plant ecology. Vegetatio 78: 109-124.
23. LÁJER K. (2007): Statistical tests as inappropriate tools for data analysis performed on non-random samples of plant communities. Folia Geobot. 42: 115-122.
24. LAWESSON J.E. & OKSANEN J. (2002): Niche characteristics of Danish woody species as derived from coenoclines. J. Veg. Sci. 13: 279-290.
25. LAWTON J.H. (1996): Patterns in ecology. Oikos 75: 145-147.
26. LAWTON J.H. (1999): Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84: 177-192.
27. LEGENDRE P.T. (1993): Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
28. LEGENDRE P., DALE M.R.T., FORTIN M.-J., GUREVITCH J., HOHN M. & MYERS D. (2002): The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25: 601-615.
29. LEGENDRE P. & LEGENDRE L. (1998): Numerical ecology, Ed. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
30. LEHMANN E.L. (1993): The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson theories of testing hypotheses: One theory or two? J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88: 1242-1249.
31. MALMER N. (1962): Studies on mire vegetation in the Archaean area of Southwestern Götaland (South Sweden). I. Vegetation and habitat conditions on the Åkhult mire. Opera Bot. 7: 1: 1-322.
32. MATHIASSEN G. & ØKLAND R.H. (2007): Relative importance of host tree species and environmental gradients for epiphytic species composition, exemplified by Pyrenomycetes s.lat. (Ascomycota on Salix in Central North Scandinavia. Ecography 30: In press.
33. MCCULLAGH P. & NELDER J.A. (1989): Generalized linear models Ed. 2. Chapman & Hall, London.
34. MCCULLOCH C.E. & SEARLE S.R. (2002): Generalized, linear, and mixed models. Wiley, New York.
35. MINCHIN P.R. (1987): An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89-107.
36. MURRAY B.G.J. (2000): Universal laws and predictive theory in ecology and evolution. Oikos 89: 403-408.
37. MURRAY B.G.J. (2001): Are ecological and evolutionary theories scientific? Biol. Rev. 76: 255-289.
38. NEKOLA J.C. & WHITE P.S. (1999): The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26: 867-878.
39. NORDHAGEN R. (1943): Sikilsdalen og Norges fjellbeiter. Bergens Mus. Skr. 22: 1-607.
40. NOSS R.F. (1996): The naturalists are dying off. Conservation Biol. 10: 1-3.
41. OHLSON M., ØKLAND R.H., NORDBAKKEN J.-F. & DAHLBERG B. (2001): Fatal interactions between Scots pine and Sphagnum mosses in bog ecosystems. Oikos 94: 425-432.
42. ØKLAND R.H. (1986): Rescaling of ecological gradients. II. The effect of scale on symmetry of species response curves, Nord. J. Bot. 6: 661-670.
43. ØKLAND R.H. (1989): A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmosen, SE Norway. I. Introduction, flora, vegetation and ecological conditions. Sommerfeltia 8: 1-172.
44. ØKLAND RTH. (1990a): Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia Suppl. 1: 1-233.
45. ØKLAND R.H. (1990b): A phytoecological study of the mire Northern Kisselbergmosen, Rødenes, SE Norway. II. Identification of gradients by detrended (canonical) correspondence analysis. Nord. J. Bot. 10: 79-108.
46. ØKLAND R.H. (1996): Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? J. Veg. Sci. 7: 289-292.
47. ØKLAND R.H. (1999): On the variation explained by ordination and constrained ordination axes. J. Veg. Sci. 10: 131-136.
48. ØKLAND R.H. & EILERTSEN O. (1993): Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal coniferous forests in the Solhomfjell area, Gjerstad, S Norway. Sommerfeltia 16: 1-254.
49. ØKLAND R.H., ØKLAND T. & RYDGREN K. (2001): Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal spruce swamp forests in Øtmarka Nature Reserve, SE Norway. Sommerfeltia 29: 1-190.
50. ØKLAND R.H., RYDGREN K. & ØKLAND T. (1999): Single-tree influence on understorey vegetation in a Norwegian boreal spruce forest. Oikos 87: 488-498.
51. ØKLAND R.H., RYDGREN K. & ØKLAND T. (2003): Plant species composition of boreal spruce swamp forests: Closed doors and windows of opportunity. Ecology 84: 1909-1919.
52. ØKLAND T. (1988): An ecological approach to the investigation of a beech forest in Vestfold, SE Norway. Nord. J. Bot. 8: 375-407.
53. ØKLAND T. (1996): Vegetation-environment relationships of boreal spruce forest in ten monitoring reference areas in Norway. Sommerfeltia 22: 1-349.
54. ØKLAND T., RYDGREN K., ØKLAND R.H., STORAUNET K.O. & ROLSTAD J. (2003): Variation in environmental conditions, understorey species richness, abundance and composition among natural and managed Picea abies forest stands. Forest Ecol. Managem. 177: 17-37.
55. OKSANEN L. (2001):ILogic of experiments in ecology: is pseudoreplication a pseudoissue? Oikos 94: 27-38.
56. OKSANEN L. (R004): The devil lies in details: reply to Hurlbert. Oikos 104: 598-605.
57. PALMER MAW. (1988): Fractal geometry: a tool for describing spatial patterns of plant communities. Vegetatio 75: 91-102.
58. PETERS R.H. (1991): A critique for ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
59. PINHEIRO J.C. & BATES D.M. (2000): Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York.
60. POPPER K.R. (1989T: Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge, London.
61. PUKKALA T., KUULUVAINEN T. & STENBERG P. (1993): Below-canopy distribution of photosynthetically active radiation and its relation to seedling growth in a boreal Pinus sylvestris stand. A simulation approach. Scand. J. Forest Res. 8: 313-325.
62. ROSSI R.E., MULLA D.J., JOURNEL A.G. & FRANZ E.H. (1992): Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 277-314.
63. RYDGREN K., ØKLAND R.H. & ØKLAND T. (2003): Species response curves along environmental gradients. A case study from SE Norwegian swamp forests. J. Veg. Sci. 14: 869-880.
64. SJÖRS H. (1948): Myrvegetation i Bergslagen (Mire vegetation in Bergslagen). Acta Phytogeogr. Suec. 21: 1-299.
65. SKRINDO A. & ØKLAND R.H. (1998): Fertilization effects and vegetation-environment relationships in a boreal pine forest in Åmli, S Norway. Sommerfeltia 25: 1-90.
66. SÖDERQFIST T. (1986): The ecologists: from merry naturalists to saviours of the nation: A sociologically informed narrative survey of the ecologization of Sweden 1895-1975. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm.
67. SOKAL R.R. & ROHLF F.J. (1995): Biometry, Ed. 3. Freeman, New York.
68. STEWART-OATEN A. (19T5): Rules and judgments in statistics: three examples. Ecology 76: 2001-2009.
69. TER BRAAK C.J.F. & LOOMAN C.W.N. (1986): Weighted averaging, logistic regression and the Gaussian response model. Vegetatio 65: 3-11.
70. TRASS H. & MALMER N. (1978): North European approaches to classification. In: WHITTAKER R.H. (ed.), Classification of plant communities, Junk, The Hague, pp. 201-245.
71. TUOMIKOSKI R. (1942): Untersuchungen über die Untervegetation der Bruchmoore in Ostfinnland I. Zur Methodik der pflanzensoziologischen Systematik. Ann. Bot. Soc. Zool.-Bot. Fenn. Vanamo 17: 1-203.
72. VENABLES W.N. & RIPLEY B.D. (2002): Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York.
73. WEBER T.P. (1999): A plea for a diversity of scientific styles in ecology. Oikos 84: 526-529.
74. WHITTAKER R.H. (1962): Classification of natural communities. Bot. Rev. 28: 1-239.
75. WHITTAKER R.H. (1967): Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 42: 207-264.
76. WIENS J.A. (1989): Spatial scaling in ecology. Funct. Ecol. 3: 385-397.
77. WILSON J.B. (2003): The deductive method in community ecology. Oikos 101: 216-218.
78. WOOD S.N. (2006): Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall, London.
79. YEE T. W. (2006): Constrained additive ordination. Ecology 87: 203-213.