Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis

Heart

Volumn 93, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 848-855

  Little, Stephen H ^a   Chan, Kwan Leung ^a   Burwash, Ian G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA HEART INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHENYLEPHRINE;

ADULT; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLOW RATE; HAND GRIP; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART VALVE STENOSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; SYSTEMIC VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOTONIC AGENTS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MALE; PHENYLEPHRINE; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 34347248775     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2006.098392     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:e1-148.
2. Otto CM. Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2141-51.
3. Montarello JK, Perakis AC, Rosenthal E, et al. Normal and stenotic human aortic valve opening: in vitro assessment of orifice area changes with flow. Eur Heart J 1990;11:484-91.
4. Chambers JB, Sprigings DC, Cochrane T, et al. Continuity equation and Gorlin formula compared with directly observed orifice area in native and prosthetic aortic valves. Br Heart J 1992;67:193-9.
5. Burwash IG, Thomas DT, Sahadiro M, et al. Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1994;89:827-35.
6. Burwash IG, Pearlman AS, Kraft CD, et al. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:1342-50.
7. Bermejo J, Fernandez-Garcia MA, Torrecilla EG, et al. Effects of dobutamine on Doppler echocardiography indexes of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:1206-13.
8. Shively BK, Charlton GA, Crawford MH, et al. Flow dependence of valve area in aortic stenosis: relation to valve morphology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:654-60.
9. Burwash IG, Hay KM, Chan KL. Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002;15:814-22.
10. Beauchesne LM, deKemp R, Chan KL, et al. Temporal variations in effective orifice area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003;16:958-64.
11. Ford LE, Feldman T, Chiu C, et al. Hemodynamic resistance as a measure of functional impairment in aortic valvular stenosis. Circ Res 1990;66:1-7.
12. Casale PN, Palacios IF, Abascal VM, et al. Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:1175-9.
13. Martin TW, Moody JM, Bird JJ, et al. Effect of exercise on indices of valvular aortic stenosis. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1992;25:265-71.
14. Ford LE, Feldman T, Carroll JD. Valve resistance. Circulation 1994;89:893-5.
15. Lee TM, Su SF, Chen MF, et al. Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis. Heart 1996;76:490-4.
16. Blitz LR, Herrmann HC. Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1996;78:657-61.
17. Antonini-Canterin F, Faggiano P, Zanuttini D. Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis? Heart 1999;82:9-10.
18. Tobin JR, Rahimtoola SH, Blundell PE, et al. Percentage of left ventricular stroke work loss: a simple hemodynamic concept for estimation of severity in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 1967;35:868- 79.
19. Sprigings DC, Chambers JB, Cochrane T, et al. Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:1608-14.
20. Bermejo J, Odreman R, Feijoo J, et al. Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis: a comparative test-based analysis of outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:142-51.
21. Garcia D, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, et al. Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity: a new index based on the energy loss concept. Circulation 2000;101:765-71.
22. Das P, Pocock C, Chambers J. The patient with a systolic murmur: severe aortic stenosis may be missed during cardiovascular examination. QJM 2000;93:685-8.
23. Lindroos M, Kupari M, Valvanne J, et al. Factors associated with calcific aortic valve degeneration in the elderly. Eur Heart J 1994;15:865-70.
24. Ie E, Mook W, Shapiro AP. Systolic hypertension in critical aortic stenosis and the effect of valve replacement. J Hum Hypertens 1996;10:65-7.
25. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, et al. Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:630-4.
26. Chan KL, Ghani M, Woodend K, et al. Case-controlled study to assess risk factors for aortic stenosis in congenitally bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:690-3.
27. Antonini-Canterin F, Huang G, Cervesato E, et al. Symptomatic aortic stenosis: does systemic hypertension play an additional role? Hypertension 2003;41:1268-72.
28. Laskey W, Kussmaul W, Noordergraaf A. Valvular and systemic arterial hemodynamics in aortic valve stenosis: model-based approach. Circulation 1995;92:1473-8.
29. Kadem L, Dumesnil JG, Rieu R, et al. Impact of systemic hypertension on the assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart 2005;91:354-61.
30. Razzolini R, Gerosa G, Leoni L, et al. Transaortic gradient is pressure-dependent in a pulsatile model of the circulation. J Heart Valve Dis 1999;8:279-83.
31. Bermejo J. The effects of hypertension on aortic valve stenosis. Heart 2005;91:280-2.
32. Chambers J. Editorial: can high blood pressure mask severe aortic stenosis? J Heart Valve Dis 1998;7:277-8.
33. White M, Fourney A, Etel M, et al. Effects of age and hypertension on cardiac responses to the ai -agonist phenylephrine in humans. Am J Hypertens 1999;12:151-8.
34. Burwash IG, Forbes AD, Sadahiro M, et al. Echocardiography volume flow and stenosis severity measures with changing volume flow rates in aortic stenosis. Am J Physiol 1993;265:H1734-43.
35. Chemla D, Hebert J-L, Coirault C, et al. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998;274:H500-5.
36. Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, et al. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 1986;73:452-9.
37. Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, et al. Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;7:509-17.
38. Ho PP, Pauls GL, Lamberton DF, et al. Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:283-7.
39. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, et al. Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 1997;95:2262-70.
40. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:611-17.
41. Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, et al. Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 2004;25:199-205.
42. Silove ED, Vogel JH, Grover RF. The pressure gradient in ventricular outflow obstruction: influence of peripheral resistance. Cardiovasc Res 1968;2:234-42.
43. DeGroff CG, Shandas R, Valdes-Cruz L. Analysis of the effect of flow rate on the Doppler continuity equation for stenotic orifice area calculations: a numerical study. Circulation 1998;97:1597-605.
44. Segal J, Lerner DJ, Miller C, et al. When should Doppler determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula? Variation in hydraulic constants in low flow states. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987;9:1294-305.
45. Voelker W, Reul H, Nienhaus G, et al. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantitation of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model. Circulation 1995;91:1196-204.
46. Kaplan NM. Systemic hypertension: mechanism and diagnosis. In: Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Braunwald E, eds. Braunwald's heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 7th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders, 2005:959-87.