Aging and clustering in globally coupled oscillators

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 75, Issue 5, 2007, Pages

  Daido, Hiroaki ^a   Nakanishi, Kenji ^a  

^a Osaka Prefecture University   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING OF MATERIALS; PHASE DIAGRAMS;

COUPLED NONLINEAR OSCILLATORS; DESYNCHRONIZATION; PERIODIC OSCILLATORS;

OSCILLATORS (ELECTRONIC);

EID: 34347220941     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.056206     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. A. T. Winfree, J. Theor. Biol. JTBIAP 0022-5193 10.1016/0022-5193(67) 90051-3 16, 15 (1967).
2. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
3. H. Daido, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. IJBEE4 0218-1274 10.1142/S0218127497000601 7, 807 (1997).
4. S. H. Strogatz, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00094-4 143, 1 (2000).
5. J. A. Acebrón, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P. Vicente, F. Ritort, and R. Spigler, Rev. Mod. Phys. RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137 77, 137 (2005).
6. A. T. Winfree, The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, New York, 2001).
7. A. K. Engel, P. König, A. K. Kreiter, T. B. Schillen, and W. Singer, Trends Neurosci. TNSCDR 0166-2236 10.1016/0166-2236(92)90039-B 15, 218 (1992).
8. K. Wiesenfeld, P. Colet, and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.404 76, 404 (1996).
9. I. Z. Kiss, Y. Zhai, and J. L. Hudson, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1070757 296, 1676 (2002).
10. K. Miyakawa and K. Yamada, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/S0167-2789(00)00218-9 151, 217 (2001).
11. H. Fukuda, J. Kodama, and S. Kai, BioSystems BSYMBO 0303-2647 10.1016/j.biosystems.2004.03.006 77, 41 (2004).
12. H. Daido and K. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.104101 93, 104101 (2004).
13. K. Nakanishi and H. Daido, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. PTPSEP 0375-9687 161, 173 (2006).
14. D. Pazó and E. Montbrio, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.055202 73, 055202 (R) (2006).
15. H. Daido and K. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.054101 96, 054101 (2006).
16. M. Shiino and M. Frankowicz, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(89)90187-4 136, 103 (1989).
17. P. C. Matthews, R. E. Mirollo, and S. H. Strogatz, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/0167-2789(91)90129-W 52, 293 (1991).
18. V. Hakim and W.-J. Rappel, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R7347 46, R7347 (1992).
19. N. Nakagawa and Y. Kuramoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. PTPKAV 0033-068X 10.1143/PTP.89.313 89, 313 (1993).
20. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization-A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
21. M. Tachikawa (unpublished).
22. D. Golomb, D. Hansel, B. Shraiman, and H. Sompolinsky, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.45.3516 45, 3516 (1992).
23. K. Okuda, Physica D PDNPDT 0167-2789 10.1016/0167-2789(93)90121-G 63, 424 (1993).
24. The linear stability of this solution was confirmed by numerically computing Floquet exponents for several values of c2 in the range 0
25. J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields (Springer, New York, 1983).
26. M. Rosenblum and A. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.064101 98, 064101 (2007).
27. J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
28. A. Sherman and J. Rinzel, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.89.6.2471 89, 2471 (1992).
29. S. K. Han, C. Kurrer, and Y. Kuramoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3190 75, 3190 (1995).
30. Note that the splitting (desynchronizing) force depends on not only Kχ but also c2. Since the dispersion of the effective natural frequencies is proportional to c2, increasing c2 will intensify the force and hence enhance the inhomogeneity of the system. This explains why the value of σ grows as c2 is increased, as seen in Fig. 7. Although the value of Kχ tends to decrease for increasing c2 (see the inset of Fig. 7), such a change is relatively small and hence does not affect the behavior of σ in a qualitative way.
31. This sticking of oscillator trajectories to the incoherent circle, which is enhanced by increasing c2, provides a possible reason why the peak of σ shifts to the small K side as c2 grows, as Fig. 7 indicates. This is because in the limit of strong sticking, σ should be approximated by rIC = 1-K and hence become maximum near K=0.
32. I. Prigogine and R. Lefever, J. Chem. Phys. JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1668896 48, 1695 (1968).
33. O. E. Rössler, Phys. Lett. PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/0375-9601(79) 90150-6 71, 155 (1979).
34. This may imply that the scaling law of an order parameter proposed in our earlier paper does not hold over a full range of the scaling variable, since it is based on the assumption that both the active and inactive groups are synchronized. However, the scaling law is about a close vicinity of the critical point, where the horn is quite thin, unless the nonisochronicity of oscillators is extremely strong. One can therefore expect that it practically holds even if a desynchronization horn exits. Of course, if the stably coexisting synchronized state is traced from outside the horn, then no violation of the scaling law will occur at all.
35. M. Yoshimoto, K. Yoshikawa, and Y. Mori, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.47.864 47, 864 (1993).