Relationship of interpersonal behaviors and health-related control appraisals to patient satisfaction and compliance in a university health center

Journal of American College Health

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 333-340

  Campbell, Thomas A ^a   Auerbach, Stephen M ^a   Kiesler, Donald J ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community health; Counseling

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COUNSELING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STUDENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENT HEALTH SERVICES; STUDENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNIVERSITIES; VIRGINIA;

EID: 34250902912     PISSN: 07448481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JACH.55.6.333-340     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Kreps G, O'Hair D. Communication and Health Outcomes. Creeskill, NJ: Hampton Press; 1995.
2. Lipscomb J, Snyder CF. The outcomes of cancer outcomes research: focusing on the National Cancer Institute's quality-of-care initiative. Med Care. 2002;40:III-3-III-10.
3. Guadagnoli E, Ward P. Patient participation in decisionmaking. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:329-339.
4. Kaplan RM. Shared medical decision making: a new paradigm for behavioral medicine - 1997 presidential address. Ann Behav Med. 1999;21:3-11.
5. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centeredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087-1110.
6. Quill TE, Brody H. Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:763-769.
7. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1995.
8. Auerbach SM. Should patients have control over their own health care: empirical evidence and research issues. Ann Behav Med. 2000;22:246-259.
9. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision making, and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models, and interventions. Patient Educ Couns. In press.
10. Auerbach SM. Do patients want control over their own health care: a review of measures, findings, and research issues. J Health Psychol. 2001;6:191-203.
11. Fallowfield L. Offering choice of surgical treatment to women with breast cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:209-214.
12. Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1865-1878.
13. DiBlasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2001;357:757-762
14. Beckman H, Kaplan SH, Frankel R. Outcome-based research on doctor-patient communication: a review. In: Stewart MA, Roter DL, eds. Communicating With Medical Patients. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989.
15. Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657-675.
16. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Integrating measurement of control and affiliation in studies of physician-patient interaction: the interpersonal circumplex. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1707-1722.
17. Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR. Patient-physician communication: a descriptive summary of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 1988;12:99-119.
18. Anderson LA, Zimmerman MA. Patient and physician perceptions of their relationship and patient satisfaction: a study of chronic disease management. Patient Educ Couns. 1993;20:27-36.
19. Hall JA, Stein TS, Roter DL, Rieser N. Inaccuracies in physicians' perceptions of their patients. Med Care. 1999;37:1164-1168.
20. Street RL Jr. Analyzing communication in medical consultations:do behavioral measures correspond to patients' perceptions? Med Care. 1992;30:976-988.
21. Kiesler DJ. Research Manual for the Impact Message Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1987.
22. Perkins MJ, Kiesler DJ, Anchin JC, Chirico BM, Kyle EM., Federman EJ. The Impact Message Inventory: a new measure of relationship in counseling/ psychotherapy and other dyads. J Couns Psychol. 1979;26:580-585.
23. Kiesler DJ. The 1982 Interpersonal circle: a taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychol Rev. 1983;90:185-214.
24. Kiesler DJ. Contemporary Interpersonal Theory and Research: Personality, Psychopathology, and Psychotherapy. New York, NY: Wiley; 1996.
25. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Participatory Style of Physician Scale. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2003.
26. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;49:651-661.
27. Braddock CH, Fihn SD, Levinson W, Jonsen AR, Pearlman RA. How doctors and patients discuss routine clinical decisions: informed decision making in the outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:339-345.
28. Kiesler DJ, Schmidt JA. The Impact Message Inventory: Form IIA Octant Scoring Version. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden; 1993.
29. Kiesler DJ, Schmidt JA, Wagner CC. Formulas for Calculating Axis, Hemisphere and Quadrant Scores and for Calculating Dyadic Complementarity Using the 8 Scales of the IMI:IIA Octant Version. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2001.
30. Kiesler DJ, Auerbach SM. Psychometric Characteristics of the Impact Message Inventory-Octant Version: An Update. Richmond, VA: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2004. (Also available at www.vcu.edu/sitar/ publications.htm).
31. Schmidt JA, Wagner CC, Kiesler DJ. Psychometric properties of the octant scale Impact Message Inventory (IMI-C): a structural evaluation. J Couns Psychol. 1999;46:325-334.
32. Smith MS, Wallston KA, Smith CA. The development and validation of the Perceived Health Competence Scale. Health Educ Res. 1995;10:51-64.
33. Hays RD, Sherbourne CD, Mazel RM. The RAND-36 item health survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993;2:217-227.
34. Cleemput I, Kesteloot K, DeGeest S. A review of the literature on the economics of noncompliance: room for methodological improvement. Health Policy. 2002;59:65-94.
35. Escoffery C, Miner, KR, Adame DD, Butler S, McCormick L, Mendell E. Internet use for health information among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2005;53:183-188.
36. Beisecker AE, Murden RA, Moore WP, Graham D, Helmig LC. Attitudes of medical students and primary care physicians regarding input of older and younger patients in medical decisions. Med Care. 1996;34:126-137.
37. Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson, W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282:2313-2320.
38. Auerbach SM, Clore JN, Kiesler DJ, et al. Relation of diabetic patients' health-related control appraisals and physician-patient interpersonal impacts to patients' metabolic control and satisfaction with treatment. J Behav Med. 2002;25:17-31.
39. Auerbach SM, Martelli M, Mercuri LG. Anxiety, information, interpersonal impacts, and adjustment to a stressful health care situation, J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44:1284-1296.
40. Linder-Pelz S. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16:577-582.
41. Aharony L, Strasser S. Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore. Med Care Rev. 1993;50:49-79.