Testing models of object substitution with backward masking

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 263-275

  Francis, Gregory ^a,c   Cho, Yang Seok ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Korea University   (South Korea)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250900403     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193748     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ALPERN, M. (1953). Metacontrast, Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 48-657.
2. ANBAU, S., & ANBAR, D. (1982). Visual masking: A unified approach. Perception, 11, 427-439.
3. BACHMANN, T. (1994). Psychophysiology of visual masking: The fine structure of conscious experience. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
4. BISCHOF, W. F., & Di LOLLO, V. (1995). Motion and metacontrast with simultaneous onset of stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of AmericaA, 12, 1623-1636.
5. BLASER, E., SPERLING, G., & Lu, Z.-L. (1999). Measuring the amplification of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 11681-11686.
6. BREITMEYER, B. G. (1984). Visual masking: An integrative approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Clarendon Press.
7. BREITMEYER, B. G., & GANZ, L. (1976). Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. Psychological Review, 83, 1-36.
8. BREITMEYER, B. G., & ÖǦMEN, H. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1572-1595.
9. BRIDGEMAN, B. (1971). Metacontrast and lateral inhibition. Psychological Review, 78, 528-539.
10. BRIDGEMAN, B. (1978). Distributed sensory coding applied to simulations of iconic storage and metacontrast. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 40, 605-623.
11. Di LOLLO, V., BISCHOF, W. F., & DIXON, P. (1993). Stimulus-onset asynchrony is not necessary for motion perception or metacontrast masking. Psychological Science, 4, 260-263.
12. DI LOLLO, V., ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481-507.
13. DI LOLLO, V., ENNS, J. T., & RENSINK, R. A. (2002). Object substitution without reentry? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 594-596.
14. DI LOLLO, V., VON MÜHLENEN, A., ENNS, J. T., & BRIDGEMAN, B. (2004). Decoupling stimulus duration from brightness in metacontrast masking: Data and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 733-745.
15. ENNS, J. T. (2004). Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking. Vision Research, 44, 1321-1331.
16. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.
17. ENNS, J. T., & DI LOLLO, V. (2000). What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 345-352.
18. ERIKSEN, C. W. (1966). Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 87-92.
19. FRANCIS, G. (1997). Cortical dynamics of lateral inhibition: Metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 104, 572-594.
20. FRANCIS, G. (2000). Quantitative theories of metacontrast masking. Psychological Review, 107, 768-785.
21. FRANCIS, G. (2003). On-line simulations of models for backward masking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 512-519.
22. FRANCIS, G., & CHO, Y. S. (2005). Quantitative models of backward masking. In H. Öǧmen & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.), The first half second: The microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes (pp. 111-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. FRANCIS, G., & HERMENS, F. (2002). Comment on Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes (Di Lollo, Enns, & Rensink, 2000). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 594-596.
24. FRANCIS, G., & HERZOG, M. H. (2004). Testing quantitative models of backward masking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 104-112.
25. JIANG, Y., & CHUN, M. M. (2001a). Asymmetric object substitution masking Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 895-918.
26. JIANG, Y., & CHUN, M. M. (2001b). The spatial gradient of visual masking by object substitution. Vision Research, 41, 3121-3131.
27. KAHAN, T. A., & MATHIS, K. M. (2002). Gestalt grouping and common onset masking. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 1248-1259.
28. LLERAS, A., & MOORE, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes the mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object-level component of object substitution masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 106-120.
29. MICHAELS, C. F., & TURVEY, M. T. (1979). Central sources of visual masking: Indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance. Psychological Research, 41, 2-61.
30. NAVARRO, D. J., PITT, M. A., & MYUNG, I. J. (2004). Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data. Cognitive Psychology, 49, 47-84.
31. NAVON, D., & PURCELL, D. (1981). Does integration produce masking or protect from it? Perception, 10, 71-83.
32. NEILL, W. T., HUTCHISON, K. A., & GRAVES, D. F. (2002). Masking by object substitution: Dissociation of masking and cuing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 682-694.
33. PITT, M. A., & MYUNG, I. J. (2002). When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 421-425.
34. REEVES, A. (1982). Metacontrast U-shaped functions derive from two monotonic processes. Perception, 11, 415-426.
35. WEISSTEIN, N. (1972). Metacontrast. In D. Jameson & L. Hurvich (Eds.), Handbook of sensory physiology: Vol. 7. Visual psychophysics (pp. 233-272). Berlin: Springer.