General purpose interactive physico-chemical property exploration

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1182-1187

  Smellie, Andrew ^a  

^a ARQULE INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DATA ACQUISITION; TOXICITY;

SPIRAL VIEW; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY (SAR); STRUCTURE-PROPERTY (SPR);

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

CYCLOOXYGENASE 2 INHIBITOR;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYCLOOXYGENASE 2 INHIBITORS; DRUG DESIGN; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 34250806025     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci060052t     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Hansch, C. Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationships. In Drug Design; Ariens, E. J., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 1972; Vol. I, 271-342.
2. Cammarata, A. Interrelation of the Regression Models Used for Structure - Activity Analyses. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15, 573.
3. Rohrbaugh, R. H.; Jurs, P. C. Descriptions of Molecular Shape Applied in Studies of Structure/Activity and Structure/Property Relationships. Anal. Chim. Acta. 1987, 199, 99-109.
4. Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
5. Rogers, D.; Hopfinger, A. J. Application of Genetic Function Approximation to Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationships and Quantitative Structure - Property Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34 (4), 854-866.
6. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of Hydrophobic (Lipophilic) Properties of Small Organic Molecules Using Fragmental Methods: An Analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP Methods. J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 3762-3772.
7. Micheli, A.; Portera, F.; Sperduti, A. QSAR/QSPR Studies by Kernel Machines, Recursive Neural Networks and Their Integration. Neural Nets, WIRN VIETRI 2003, Vietri sul Mare, Italy, June 4-7, 2003; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, LNCS Vol. 2859; Apolloni, B., Marinaro, M., Tagliaferri, R., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003; pp 308-315; Revised Papers, ISBN: 3-540-20227-7
8. Maw, H. H.; Hall, L. H. E-State Modeling of Corticosteroids Binding Affinity: Validation of Model for Small Data Set. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1248-1254.
9. Rytting, E.; Lentz, K. A.; Chen, X.-Q.; Qian, F.; Venkatesh, S. A. Quantitative Structure - Property Relationship for Predicting Drug Solubility in PEG 400/Water Cosolvent Systems. Pharm. Res. 2004, 21 (2), 237-244.
10. IC50: The concentration of an inhibitor that is required for 50% inhibition of an enzyme in vitro.
11. LD50: A chemical dose lethal to 50 percent of a test population.
12. As implemented in: Sybyl; Tripos, Inc.: St. Louis, MO 63144-2319.
13. As implemented in: MOE; Chemical Computing Group: W.Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2R7.
14. As implemented in: Cerius2; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA 92121.
15. Leadscope Inc., 1393 Dublin Road, Columbus, Ohio 43215.
16. Singh, J. Technologies for Small Molecule Drug Design; Bio IT World: Boston, MA, May 17-19, 2005.
17. Pipeline Pilot; SciTegic: San Diego, CA 92123-1365.
18. Mason, J. S.; Morize, I.; Menard, P. R.; Cheney, D. L.; Hulme, C.; Labaudiniere, R. F. New 4-Point Pharmacophore Method for Molecular Similarity and Diversity Applications: Overview of the Method and Applications, Including a Novel Approach to the Design of Combinatorial Libraries Containing Privileged Substructures. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42(17), 3251-64.
19. Rarey, M.; Dixon, J. S. Feature Trees: A New Molecular Similarity Measure Based on Tree Matching. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 5, 471-90
20. Hahn, M. Three-Dimensional Shape-Based Searching of Conformationally Flexible Compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 80-86
21. Russom, C. L.; Bradbury, S. P.; Broderius, S. J.; Hammermeister, D. E.; Drummond, R. A. Predicting Modes of Action from Chemical Structure: Acute Toxicity in the Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16 (5), 948-967.
22. Viswanadhan, V. N.; Chose, A. K.; Revankar, G. R.; Robins, R. K. Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three Dimensional Structure Directed Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. 4. Additional Parameters for Hydrophobie and Dispersive Interactions and Their Application for an Automated Superposition of Certain Naturally Occurring Nucleoside Antibiotics. J. them. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 163-172.
23. Bailey, H. C.; Spanggord, R. J. Aquat. Toxicol. Hazard Assess.; ASTM Spec Tech Publ 802: West Conshohocken, PA, 1983; pp 98-107.
24. Huuskonen, J. Estimation of Aqueous Solubility in Drug Design. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2001, 4 (3), 311-316.
25. Kalgutkar, A. S.; Zhao, Z. Discovery and Design of Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors as Non-Ulcerogenic, Anti-Inflammatory Drugs with Potential Utility as Anti-Cancer Agents. Curr. Drug Targets 2001, 2, 79-106.
26. Talley, J. J. Prog. Med. Chem. 1999, 36, 201-234.
27. Carter, J. S. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 1998, 8 (1), 21.
28. Prasit, P.; Riendeau, D. Annu. Rep. Med. Chem. 1997, 32, 211-220.
29. Sutherland J. J.; O'Brien. L. A.; Weaver, D. F. A Comparison of Methods for Modeling Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships. J. Med. Chem, 2004, 47 (22), 5541-5554.