The impact of over-exploitation on the genetic structure of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) populations determined by RAPD markers

Silva Fennica

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 211-220

  Lise, Yildiray ^a   Kaya, Zeki ^a   Isik, Fikret ^b   Sabuncu, Rumi ^c   Kandemir, Irfan ^d   Önde, Sertaç ^a  

^a MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Southwest Anatolia Forest Research Institute   (Turkey)

^d ZONGULDAK KARAELMAS UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Genetic structure; Human over exploitation; Inbreeding; Pinus brutia Ten.; RAPD PCR

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; GENETIC ENGINEERING; POLYMORPHISM;

MEDITERRANEAN REGION; RANDOMLY AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; TURKISH RED PINE;

FORESTRY;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; EXPLOITATION; GENETIC STRUCTURE; HETEROZYGOSITY; INBREEDING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TREE;

GENETIC ENGINEERING; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PINUS BRUTIA;

EURASIA; MEDITERRANEAN COAST [TURKEY]; TURKEY;

PINUS BRUTIA; PINUS RESINOSA;

EID: 34250801485     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.291     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aldrich, P.R., Hamrick, J.L., Chavarriaga, P. & Kochert, G. 1998. Microsatellite analysis of demographic genetic structure in fragmented populations of the tropical tree Symphonia globulifera. Molecular Ecology 7: 933-944.
2. Arbez, M. 1974. Distribution, ecology and variation of Pinus brutia in Turkey. FAO, Forest Genetic Resources 4: 21-33.
3. Atalay, I. 1982. A general survey of the vegetation of north-eastern Anatolia. Ege Cografya Dergisi (Eagean Geographical Journal) 1: 14-39.
4. Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N. & Bonhomme, F. 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).
5. Cesarone, C., Bolognesi, C. & Santi, L. 1979. Improved microfluorometric DNA determination in biological material using 33258 Hoechst. Analytical Biochemistry 100: 188-197.
6. Chaisurisri, K. & El-Kassaby, Y.A. 1994. Genetic diversity in a seed production population vs natural populations of Sitka spruce. Biodiversity and Conservation 3: 512-523.
7. Charlesworth, D. & Charlesworth, B. 1987. Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics 18: 237-68.
8. Cheliak, W.M., Murray, G. & Pitel, J.A. 1988. Genetic effects of phenotypic selection in white spruce. Forest Ecology and Management 24: 139-149.
9. Conkle, M.T., Schiller, G. & Grünwald, C. 1988. Electrophoretic analysis of diversity and phylogeny of Pinus brutia and closely related taxa. Systematic Botany 13: 411-424.
10. Dayanandan, S., Dole, J., Bawa, K. & Kesseli, R. 1999. Population structure delineated with microsatellite markers in fragmented populations of a tropical tree, Carapa guianensis (Meliaceae). Molecular Ecology 8: 1585-1592.
11. Dogan, B. 2000. A study of determining of genetic patterns of Turkish Red Pine populations by using multivariate analysis. PhD thesis. Ege University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Izmir, Turkey. (In Turkish with English abstract).
12. El-Kassaby, Y.A. & Ritland, K. 1996. Impact of selection and breeding on genetic diversity in Douglas-fir. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 795-813.
13. Godt, M.J.W., Hamrick, J.L., Edwards-Burke, M.A. & Williams, J.H. 2001. Comparisons of genetic diversity in white spruce (Picea glauca) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana) seed orchards with natural populations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 943-949.
14. Gülbaba, A.G. & Özkurt, N. 1998. Isozyme diversity in natural populations of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) from Bolkar Mountains. Dogu Akdeniz Ormanc?l?k Arast?rma Enstitüsü Publications, Technical Bulletin, Tarsus, n:o 5. p. 27. (In Turkish with English summary).
15. Guries, R. & Ledig, F.T. 1981. Genetic structure of populations and differentiation in forest trees. In: Conkle, M.T. (ed.). Proceedings of the Symposium on Isozymes of North American Forest Trees and Forest Insects. Berkeley, California. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-48. p. 30-37.
16. Hamrick, J.L. & Godt, M.J.W. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plant species. In: Brown, A.H.D., Clegg, M.T., Kahler, A.L. & Weir, B.S. (eds.). Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts. p. 43-63.
17. _ , Godt, M.J.W. & Sherman, B. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests 6: 95-124.
18. Içgen, Y., Kaya, Z., Çengel, B., Velioglu, E., Öztürk, H, & Önde, S. 2006. Potential impact of forest management and tree improvement on genetic diversity of Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) plantations in Turkey. Forest Ecology and Management 225: 328-336.
19. Isabel, N., Beaulieu, J. & Bousquet, J. 1995. Complete congruence between gene diversity estimates derived from genotypic data at enzyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA loci in black spruce. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA 92: 6369-6373.
20. Isik, K. & Kara, N. 1997. Altitudinal variation in Pinus brutia Ten. and its implication in genetic conservation and seed transfers in southern Turkey. Silvae Genetica 46: 113-120.
21. Kandedmir, G., Kandemir, I. & Kaya, Z. 2004. The pattern of genetic variation in Turkish red pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) seed stands as determined by RAPD markers. Silvae Genetica 53: 169-175.
22. Kara, N., Korol, L., Isik, K. & Schiller, G. 1997. Genetic diversity in Pinus brutia Ten.: altitudinal variation. Silvae Genetica 46: 155-161.
23. Kaya, Z. 1998. Current status of genetic resources. In: Zencirci, N., Kaya, Z., Anikster, Y. & Adams, W.T. (eds.). The Proceedings of International Symposium on In Situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity. Central Research Institute for Field Crops Publication, Ankara. p. 17-31.
24. _ & Neale, D.B. 1993. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) polymorphisms in Pinus nigra var. pallasiana and Pinus brutia. Doga Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 17: 295-306.
25. _ & Neale, D.B. 1995. Linkage map based on randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers in Pinus brutia. Silvae Genetica 44: 110-116.
26. _ & Isik, F. 1997. The pattern of genetic variation in shoot growth of Pinus brutia Ten. populations sampled from Toros Mountains in Turkey. Silvae Genetica 46: 73-81.
27. Kimura, M. & Crow, J.M. 1978. Effect of overall phenotypic selection on genetic change at individual loci. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences Washington 75: 6168-6171.
28. Knowles, P. 1985. Comparison of isozyme variation among natural stands and plantations: jack pine and black spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 15: 902-908.
29. Langella, O. 2002. Population 1.2.28. Logiciel de génétique des populations. Laboratoire Popoulations, génétique et evolution, CNRS, UPR 9034, Gifsur Yvette.
30. Lee, C.T., Wickneswari, R., Mahani, M.C. & Zakri, A.H. 2002. Effect of selective logging on the genetic diversity of Scaphium macropodum. Biological Conservation 1004: 107-118.
31. Lowe, A.J., Boshier, D., Ward, M., Bacles, C.F.E. & Navarro, C. 2005. Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling emprical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 255-273.
32. Lynch, M. & Milligan, B.G. 1994. Analysis of population genetic structure with RAPD markers. Molecular Ecology 3: 91-99.
33. Macdonald, S.E., Thomas, B.R., Cherniawsky, D.M. & Purdy, B.G. 2001. Managing genetic resources of lodgepole pine in west central Alberta: Patterns of isozyme variation in natural populations and effects of forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 152: 45-58.
34. Morris, R.W. & Spieth, P.T. 1978. Sampling strategies for using female megagametophytes to estimate heterozygosities in conifers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 51: 217-222.
35. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 283-292.
36. _ 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583-590.
37. _ 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
38. Neyisci, N. 2001. Ecology of Turkish red pine. In: Öktem, E. (ed.). Handbook of Turkish red pine. Ormancilik Arastirma Enstitusu Publications, Muhtelif Yayinlar Serisi 52: 25-56. (In Turkish).
39. Panetsos, K.P., Aravanopoulos, F.A. & Scaltsoyiannes, A. 1998. Genetic variation of Pinus brutia from islands of the Northeastern Aegean Sea. Silvae Genetica 47: 115-120.
40. Rajora, O.P. 1999. Genetic biodiversity impacts of silvicultural practices and phenotypic selection in white spruce. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 99: 954-961.
41. _ & Phular, S.A. 2003. Genetic diversity impacts on forests fires, forest harvesting, and alternative reforestation practices in black spruce (Picea mariana). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106: 1203-1212.
42. Rogers, D.L. 2004. In situ genetic conservation of a naturally restricted and commertially widespread species, Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management 197: 311-322.
43. Savolainen, O. & Kärkkäinen, K. 1992. Effect of forest management on gene pools. New Forests 6: 329-345.
44. Schmidtling, R.C. & Hipkins, V. 1998. Genetic diversity in long-leaf pine (Pinus palustris): influence of historical and prehistorical events. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28: 1135-1145.
45. Sproule, A.T. & Dancik, B.P. 1996. The mating system of black spruce in northcentral Alberta, Canada. Silvae Genetica 45: 154-159.
46. Stoehr, M.U. & El-Kassaby, Y.A. 1997. Levels of genetic diversity at different stages of the domestication cycle of interior spruce in British Columbia. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 83-90.
47. Szmidt, A.E., Wang, X.R. & Lu, M.Z. 1996. Empirical assessment of allozyme and RAPD variation in Pinus sylvestris L. using haploid tissue analysis. Heredity 76: 412-420.
48. Thomas, B.R., Macdonald, S.E., Hicks, M., Adams, D.L. & Hodgetts, R.B. 1999. Effects of reforestation methods on genetic diversity of lodgepole pine: an assessment using microsatellite and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98: 793-801.
49. Weir, B.S. 1996. Genetic data analysis II. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
50. Yeh, F.C., Yang, R. & Boyle, T. 1999. POPGENE Version 1.32. Windows-based software for population genetics analysis.