Flap dimensions created with the IntraLase FS laser

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 26-32

  Binder, Perry S ^a  

^a Gordon Binder and Weiss Vision Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; DEVICE; HUMAN; INFLAMMATION; LASER; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STANDARD;

EID: 1242296933     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00578-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bron A.J. The architecture of the corneal stroma. Br J Ophthalmol. 85:2001;379-383. [editorial].
2. Kolozsvári L., Nógrádi A., Hopp B., Bor Z. UV absorbance of the human cornea in the 240- to 400-nm range. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 43:2002;2165-2168.
3. Seiler T., Koufala K., Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 14:1998;312-317.
4. Binder PS, Lambert RW. A comparison of current instrumentation for lamellar refractive surgery. In: Long DA, ed, Cornea and Refractive Surgery; Proceedings of the 46th Annual Symposium of the New Orleans Academy of Ophthalmology. The Hague, Kugler, 1997; 189-218.
5. Walker M.B., Wilson S.E. Lower intraoperative flap complication rate with the Hansatome microkeratome compared to the automated corneal shaper. J Refract Surg. 16:2000;79-82.
6. Arbelaez M.C. Nidek MK 2000 microkeratome clinical evaluation. J Refract Surg. 18:2002;S357-S360.
7. Uçakhan ÖÖ Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Summit Krumeich-Barraquer microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 28:2002;798-804.
8. Shemesh G., Dotan G., Lipshitz I. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes. J Refract Surg. 18:2002;S347-S351.
9. Binder P.S. Defining the profile of the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome. Ophthalmic Pract. 17:1999;308-313.
10. Nordan L.T., Slade S.G., Baker R.N.et al. Femtosecond laser flap creation for laser in situ keratomileusis. six-month follow-up of initial US clinical series J Refract Surg. 19:2003;8-14.
11. Kurtz R., Liu X., Elner V.M. Photodisruption in the human cornea as a function of laser pulse width. J Refract Surg. 13:1997;653-658.
12. Juhasz T., Loesel F., Kurtz R.et al. Femtosecond laser refractive corneal surgery. IEEE J Spec Top Quant Electron. 5:1999;902-910.
13. Vogel A., Günther T., Asiyo-Vogel M., Birngruber R. Factors determining the refractive effects of intrastromal photorefractive keratectomy with the picosecond laser. J Cataract Refract Surg. 23:1997;1301-1310.
14. Kurtz R.M., Horvath C., Liu H.-H.et al. Lamellar refractive surgery with scanned picosecond and femtosecond laser pulses. J Refract Surg. 14:1998;541-548.
15. Ratkay-Taub I., Juhasz T., Horvath C.et al. Ultra-short pulse (femtosecond) laser surgery; initial use in LASIK flap creation. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 14(2):2001;347-355.
16. Binder PS, Flannagan GF. The precision of flap measurements for laser in situ keratomileusis. In press, J Refract Surg.
17. Yildirim R., Aras C., Ozdamar A.et al. Reproducibility of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Hansatome microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 26:2000;1729-1732.
18. Yi W.-M., Joo C.-K. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using an SCMD manual microkeratome. J Cataract Refract Surg. 25:1999;1087-1092.
19. Müller L., Pels E., Vrensen G.F.J.M. The specific architecture of the anterior stroma accounts for maintenance of corneal curvature. Br J Ophthalmol. 85:2001;437-443.
20. Tham V.M.-B., Maloney R.K. Microkeratome complications of laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology. 107:2000;920-924.
21. Binder P.S., Akers P.H., Deg J.K., Zavala E.Y. Refractive keratoplasty; microkeratome evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol. 100:1982;802-806.