From the deep sea to the stars: human life support through minimal communities

Current Opinion in Microbiology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 231-237

  Hendrickx, Larissa ^a   Mergeay, Max ^a  

^a Molecular and Cellular Biology   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANE; OXYGEN; WATER;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; ECOSYSTEM; ENERGY RESOURCE; FOOD QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METABOLISM; MICROCLIMATE; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECYCLING; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPACE FLIGHT;

BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS, CLOSED; ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY; HUMANS; LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 34250742018     PISSN: 13695274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2007.05.007     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Takai K., Gamo T., Tsunogai U., Nakayama N., Hirayama H., Nealson K.H., and Horikoshi K. Geochemical and microbiological evidence for a hydrogen-based, hyperthermophilic subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystem (HyperSLiME) beneath an active deep-sea hydrothermal field. Extremophiles 8 (2004) 269-282
2. 2-rich fluids from serpentinization:Geochemical and biotic implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101 (2004) 12818-12823
3. Miroshnichenko M.L., and Bonch-Osmolovskaya E.A. Recent developments in the thermophilic microbiology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Extremophiles 10 (2006) 85-96
4. Dismukes G.C., Klimov V.V., Baranov S.V., Kozlov Y.N., DasGupta J., and Tyryshkin A. The origin of atmospheric oxygen on Earth: The innovation of oxygenic photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98 (2001) 2170-2175
5. Paerl H.W., Pinckney J.L., and Steppe T.F. Cyanobacterial-bacterial mat consortia: examining the functional unit of microbial survival and growth in extreme environments. Environ Microbiol 2 (2000) 11-26
6. Martínez-Alonso M., Mir J., Caumette P., Gaju N., Guerrero R., and Esteve I. Distribution of phototrophic populations and primary production in a microbial mat from the Ebro Delta, Spain. Int Microbiol 7 (2004) 19-25
7. Guerrero R., Piqueras M., and Berlanga M. Microbial mats and the search for minimal ecosystems. Int Microbiol 5 (2002) 177-188
8. Beatty J.T., Overmann J., Lince M.T., Manske A.K., Lang A.S., Blankenship R.E., Van Dover C.L., Martinson T.A., and Plumley F.G. An obligately photosynthetic bacterial anaerobe from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 9306-9310. The discovery of the obligate green sulfur photosynthetic organism introduces the discussion about the existence of extraterrestrial life based on photosynthesis on planets and moons far from the sun, using geothermal light as an energy source.
9. Walter A., and Lambrecht S.C. Biosphere 2 center as a unique tool for environmental studies. J Environ Monit 6 (2004) 267-277
10. Nitta K., and Aiga I. The aim of closed habitation experiments using the mini-earth and its schedule. In: Tako Y. (Ed). Closed Habitation Experiments and Material Circulation Technology; Rokkasho, Japan (2004), Institute for Environmental Sciences 3-11
11. Mergeay M., Verstraete W., Dubertret G., Lefort-Tran M., Chipaux C., and Binot R.A. 'MELiSSA' - a microorganisms-based model for 'CELSS' development. 3rd European Symposium on Space Thermal Control & Life Support Systems; Noordwijk, The Netherlands (1988) 65-68
12. Bartsev S.I., Mezhevikin V.V., and Okhonin V.A. BIOS-4 as an embodiment of CELSS development conception. Adv Space Res 18 (1996) 201-204
13. Gitelson J., and MacElroy R. Man-made closed ecological systems (1999), OPA Ltd, Overseas Publishing Associates, Gordon & Breech Publishing Group
14. Fisher J., and Kliss M. Waste processing research and technology development at NASA Ames research centre. In: Tako Y. (Ed). Closed habitation experiments and material circulation technology; Rokkasho, Japan (2004), IES 131-148
15. Drysdale A.E., Rutkze C.J., Albright L.D., and LaDue R.L. The minimal cost of life in space. Adv Space Res 34 (2004) 1502-1508
16. Hendrickx L., De Wever H., Hermans V., Mastroleo F., Morin N., Wilmotte A., Janssen P., and Mergeay M. Microbial ecology of the closed artificial ecosystem MELiSSA (Micro-Ecological Life Support System Alternative): reinventing and compartmentalizing the Earth's food and oxygen regeneration system for long-haul space exploration missions. Res Microbiol 157 (2006) 77-86
17. Garcia-Pichel F. Cyanobacteria. In: Press A. (Ed). Encyclopedia of Microbiology (2000) 907-929 vol 1
18. Das H., and Singh S.K. Useful byproducts from cellulosic wastes of agriculture and food industry - A critical appraisal. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 44 (2004) 77-89
19. Mansfield S.D., Mooney C., and Saddler J.N. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15 (1999) 804-816
20. Tikhomirov AA, Ushakova SA, Kovaleva NP, Kudenko YA, Zolotukhin IG, Tikhomirova NA, Velichko VV: Some ways of waste utilization for a bioregenerative life support system. In International Symposium On Closed Habitation Experiments And Material Circulation Technology; Rokkasho, Japan, Edited by Tako Y: 2004:210-213.
21. Tsuga S., Arai R., Tako Y., Nitta K., Haga H., Fukuda S., and Maruyama K. Performance tests of waste decomposition subsystem of CEEF for integration. In: Tako Y. (Ed). International Symposium On Closed Habitation Experiments and Material Circulation Technology; Rokkasho, Japan (2004), IES 76-83
22. Lissens G., Verstraete W., Albrecht T., Brunner G., Creuly C., Seon J., Dussap G., and Lasseur C. Advanced anaerobic bioconversion of lignocellulosic waste for bioregenerative life support following thermal water treatment and biodegradation by Fibrobacter succinogenes. Biodegradation 15 (2004) 173-183
23. Verstraete W., Bursens J., Dussap C.G., Creuly C., Christophe G., Markel H., Kube J., Bruner G., and Albrecht T. Complementary technologies for the first compartment. In: Vieira da Silva L., and Lasseur C. (Eds). MELiSSA Yearly Report For 2004 Activity (2005), ESA 24-65
24. Doi R.H., and Kosugi A. Cellulosomes: plant-cell-wall-degrading enzyme complexes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2 (2004) 541-551
25. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., and Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol 96 (2005) 673-686
26. Bothe H., Jensen K.M., Mergel A., Larsen J., Jakuba M., and Jorgensen L. Heterotrophic bacteria growing in association with Methylococcus capsulatus (Beth) in a single cell protein production process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59 (2002) 33-39
27. Nauhaus K., Treude T., Boetius A., and Kruger M. Environmental regulation of the anaerobic oxidation of methane: a comparison of ANME-I and ANME-II communities. Environ Microbiol 7 (2005) 98-106
28. Brazelton W.J., Schrenk M.O., Kelley D.S., and Baross J.A. Methane- and sulfur-metabolizing microbial communities dominate the lost city hydrothermal field ecosystem. Appl Environ Microbiol 72 (2006) 6257-6270
29. Girguis P.R., Cozen A.E., and DeLong E.F. Growth and population dynamics of anaerobic methane-oxidizing archaea and sulfate-reducing bacteria in a continuous-flow bioreactor. Appl Environ Microbiol 71 (2005) 3725-3733
30. Raghoebarsing A.A., Pol A., van de Pas-Schoonen K.T., Smolders A.J.P., Ettwig K.F., Rijpstra W.I.C., Schouten S., Damsté J.S.S., de Camp H.J.M., Jetten M.S.M., et al. A microbial consortium couples anaerobic methane oxidation to denitrification. Nature 440 (2006) 918-921. In this paper, a consortium of two organisms is described that couples direct anaerobic oxidation of methane to denitrification of nitrate. The nucleic acid markers characteristic of both are present in freshwater samples worldwide, indicating important implications in global methane cycling.
31. Sanchez-Luna L.D., Bezerra R.P., Matsudo M.C., Sato S., Converti A., and de Carvalho J.C. Influence of pH, temperature, and urea molar flowrate on Arthrospira platensis fed-batch cultivation: A kinetic and thermodynamic approach. Biotechnol Bioeng 96 (2007) 702-711
32. Nealson K.H., Inagaki F., and Takai K. Hydrogen-driven subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystems (SLiMEs): do they exist and why should we care?. Trends Microbiol 13 (2005) 405-410. Within this paper, a definition of a true subsurface lithoautotrophic microbial ecosystem (SliME) is described as an ecosystem that is solely energetically powered by the geosphere, both for its energy sources and its oxidants, free from any electron donors and acceptors generated by photosynthesis or its products. The debate on the existence of SliMEs triggers the hypothesis of life on early Earth as being non-photosynthetic in origin, as well as the hypothesis of the existence of life in the absence of photosynthetically active radiation on other planetary bodies.
33. Spear J.R., Walker J.J., McCollom T.M., and Pace N.R. Hydrogen and bioenergetics in the Yellowstone geothermal ecosystem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2004) 2555-2560
34. Kimura H., Sugihara M., Yamamoto H., Patel B.K.C., Kato K., and Hanada S. Microbial community in a geothermal aquifer associated with the subsurface of the Great Artesian Basin, Australia. Extremophiles 9 (2005) 407-414
35. Kerr R.A. Life slow enough to live on radioactivity. Science 312 (2006) 179
36. Galès G., Libert M.F., Sellier R., Cournac L., Chapon V., and Heulin T. Molecular hydrogen from water radiolysis as an energy source for bacterial growth in a basin containing irradiating waste. FEMS Microbiol Lett 240 (2004) 155-162
37. Okabe S., Odagiri M., Ito T., and Satoh H. Succession of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in the microbial community on corroding concrete in sewer systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 73 (2007) 971-980
38. King G.M., and Weber C.F. Distribution, diversity and ecology of aerobic CO-oxidizing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 5 (2007) 107-118
39. Macur R.E., Langer H.W., Kocar B.D., and Inskeep W.P. Linking geochemical processes with microbial community analysis: successional dynamics in an arsenic-rich, acid-sulphate-chloride geothermal spring. Geobiology 2 (2004) 163-177
40. 2 production by a hyperthermophilic archaeon isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Extremophiles 8 (2004) 317-323
41. Kelley D.S., Karson J.A., Fruh-Green G.L., Yoerger D.R., Shank T.M., Butterfield D.A., Hayes J.M., Schrenk M.O., Olson E.J., Proskurowski G., et al. A serpentinite-hosted ecosystem: the Lost City hydrothermal field. Science 307 (2005) 1428-1434
42. Edgcomb V.P., Kysela D.T., Teske A., de Vera Gomez A., and Sogin M.L. Benthic eukaryotic diversity in the Guaymas basin hydrothermal vent environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99 (2002) 7658-7662
43. Suzuki Y., Kojima S., Sasaki T., Suzuki M., Utsumi T., Watanabe H., Urakawa H., Tsuchida S., Nunoura T., Hirayama H., et al. Host-symbiont relationships in hydrothermal vent gastropods of the genus Alviniconcha from the Southwest Pacific. Appl Environ Microbiol 72 (2006) 1388-1393
44. 2 conditions. Cyanobacteria are evaluated as terraforming candidates for growing in near-Martian cultivation conditions.
45. Cogne G., Cornet J.F., and Gros J.B. Design, operation, and modeling of a membrane photobioreactor to study the growth of the Cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis in space conditions. Biotechnol Prog 21 (2005) 741-750. Growth of A. platensis under space conditions is foreseen through automated gas separation, pressure monitoring, pH follow-up and optical density measurement. The tools developed were designed to measure growth kinetics under microgravity conditions in an entirely sealed photobioreactor.
46. Favier-Teodorescu L., Cornet J.F., and Dussap C.G. Modelling continuous cultures of Rhodospirillum rubrum in a photobioreactor under light limited conditions. Biotechnol Lett 25 (2003) 359-364
47. Pérez J., Poughon L., Dussap C.-G., Montesinos J.L., and Gòdia F. Dynamics and steady state operation of a nitrifying fixed bed biofilm reactor: mathematical model based description. Process Biochem 40 (2005) 2359-2369
48. Godia F., Albiol J., Perez J., Creus N., Cabello F., Montras A., Masot A., and Lasseur C. The MELiSSA pilot plant facility as an integration test-bed for advanced life support systems. Adv Space Res 34 (2004) 1483-1493
49. Rabbow E., Stojicic N., Walrafen D., Baumstark-Khan C., Rettberg P., Schulze-Varnholt D., Franz M., and Reitz G. The SOS-LUX-TOXICITY-Test on the international space station. Res Microbiol 157 (2006) 30-36
50. Newcombe D.A., Schuerger A.C., Benardini J.N., Dickinson D., Tanner R., and Venkateswaran K. Survival of spacecraft-associated microorganisms under simulated Martian UV irradiation. Appl Environ Microbiol 71 (2005) 8147-8156
51. Nickerson C.A., Ott C.M., Wilson J.W., Ramamurthy R., and Pierson D.L. Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68 (2004) 345-361
52. Paul A.-L., Schuerger A.C., Popp M.P., Richards J.T., Manak M.S., and Ferl R.J. Hypobaric biology: Arabidopsis gene expression at low atmospheric pressure. Plant Physiol 134 (2004) 215-223
53. Matin A., and Lynch S.V. Investigating the threat of bacteria grown in space. ASM News 71 (2005) 235-240
54. Novikova N., De Boever P., Poddubko S., Deshevaya E., Polikarpov N., Rakova N., Coninx I., and Mergeay M. Survey of environmental biocontamination on board the International Space Station. Res Microbiol 157 (2006) 5-12
55. Manukovsky N.S., Kovalev V.S., Somova L.A., Gurevich Y.L., and Sadovsky M.G. Material balance and diet in bioregenerative life support systems: Connection with coefficient of closure. Adv Space Res 35 (2005) 1563-1569
56. Gros J.B., Poughon L., Lasseur C., and Tikhomirov A.A. Recycling efficiencies of C, H, O, N, S, and P elements in a biological life support system based on microorganisms and higher plants. Adv Space Res 31 (2003) 195-199
57. Montgomery R. Development of biobased products. Bioresour Technol 91 (2004) 1-29
58. Jessup C.M., Kassen R., Forde S.E., Kerr B., Buckling A., Rainey P.B., and Bohannan B.J.M. Big questions, small worlds: Microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 19 (2004) 189-197
59. Stokstad E. Taking the pulse of Earth's life support systems. Science 308 (2005) 41-43. The paper provides a summary of the main conclusions of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA), initiated in 2001, for evaluating the durability of the world's ecosystems and the sustainability of the services that they provide. The sore points of how we currently manage ecosystems are identified. Problematic likewise is the non-existence of basic information necessary to perform accurate predictions on the future state of ecosystems. The MA tried to translate the consequences of ecosystem changes in economically important parameters. By reformatting the consequences of ecosystem changes in how it influences human well-being, hands-on information is provided for policy makers to make the necessary decisions.