The double-edged sword of public-resource dependence: The impact of public resources on autonomy and legitimacy in Korean cultural nonprofit organizations

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 205-226

  Jung, Kwangho ^a   Moon, M Jae ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Autonomy; Legitimacy; Nonprofit organizations; Public resource dependence

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMY; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA;

EID: 34250733375     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: 15410072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00216.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Aldrich, Howard E., and C. Marlene Fiol. 1994. "Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation." Academy of Management Review 9: 645-70.
2. Baum, Joel A., and Christine Oliver. 1992. "Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations." American Sociological Review 57: 540-59.
3. Borgonovi, Francesca, and Michael O'Hare. 2004. "The Impact of the National Endowment for the Arts in the United States: Institutional and Sectoral Effects on Private Funding." Journal of Cultural Economics 28: 21-36.
4. Brighouse, Harry. 1995. "Neutrality, Publicity and State Funding of the Arts." Philosophy and Public Affairs 24: 35-63.
5. Brinkerhoff, Jennifer M. 2002. Partnership for International Development: Rhetoric or Results? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
6. Choi, Byung-Goo. 1999. Organizational Relations and Managerial Behaviors of Cultural Nonprofit Organizations in Korea. PhD diss., Syracuse University.
7. Chung, Hongik I. 1992. "Cultural Policy and Development in Korea." Korean Journal of Policy Studies 7: 1-7.
8. Deephouse, David L. 1996. "Does Isomorphism Legitimate?" Academy of Management Journal 39: 1024-39.
9. DiMaggio, Paul, and Becky Pettit. 1999. "Public Opinion and Political Vulnerability: Why Has the National Endowment for the Arts Been such an Attractive Target?" Working Paper No. 7, Princeton University, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.
10. Elsbach, Kimberly D. 1994. "Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: The Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts." Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 57-88.
11. Fligstein, Neil. 1985. "The Spread of the Multidivisional Form among Large Firms, 1919-1979." American Sociological Review 50: 377-91.
12. Frederickson, H. George, and Kevin Smith. 2003. The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. Frey, Bruno S. 1999. "State Support and Creativity in the Arts: Some New Considerations." Journal of Cultural Economics 23: 71-85.
14. Froelich, Karen A. 1999. "Diversification of Revenue Strategies: Evolving Resource Dependence in Nonprofit Organizations." Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28: 246-68.
15. Galaskiewicz, Joseph. 1985. "Interorganizational Relations." Annual Review of Sociology 11: 281-304.
16. Galaskiewicz, Joseph, and Wolfgang Bielefeld. 1998. Nonprofit Organizations in an Age of Uncertainty: A Study of Organizational Change. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
17. Grønbjerg, Kirsten A. 1993. Understanding Nonprofit Funding: Managing Revenues in Social Service and Community Development Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Hannan, Michael T., and John H. Freeman. 1984. "Structural inertia and organizational change." American Sociological Review 49: 149-64.
19. Jung, Kwangho H., and Gi-Heon Kwon. 2003. "A Study of a Relationship between Organizational Autonomy and Resource Dependency in Cultural Nonprofit Organizations." Korean Policy Studies Review 12: 127-50.
20. Kettl, Donald. 2002. The Transformation of Governance: Public Administration for Twenty-First Century America. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21. Kim, Pan S., and M. Jae Moon. 2003. "NGOs as Incubator of Participative Democracy in South Korea: Political, Voluntary, and Policy Participation." International Journal of Public Administration 26: 549-67.
22. Korea Culture and Tourism Policy Institute. 2000. Survey Report on Artists' Organizations. Seoul: Korea Culture and Tourism Policy Institute.
23. Korea Ministry of Culture and Tourism. 2002. White Paper of Cultural Policy 2002. Seoul: Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
24. Massey, Joseph E. 2001. "Managing Organizational Legitimacy: Communication Strategies for Organizations in Crisis." Journal of Business Communication 38: 153-83.
25. Montias, John M. 1986. "Public Support for the Performing Arts in Europe and the United States." In Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint, ed. Paul J. DiMaggio. New York: Oxford University Press, 287-319.
26. Moon, M. Jae. 2001. "Cultural Governance: A Comparative Study of Three Cultural Districts." Administration & Society 33: 432-54.
27. Netzer, Dick. 1978. The Subsidized Muse: Public Support for the Arts in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Pankratz, David B. 1993. Multiculturalism and Public Arts Policy. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
29. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and G. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
30. Pick, John. 1993. The Arts in a State: A Study of Government Arts Policies from Ancient Greece to the Present. London: Bristol Classical Press.
31. Quinn, Ruth-Blandina. 1997. "Distance or Intimacy? The Arm's Length Principle, the British Government and the Arts Council of Great Britain." International Journal of Cultural Policy 4: 127-60.
32. Rhyu, Hee-Joo. 2003. "The Actual State of Korean Culture and Art Government Subsidy Use." Korean Journal of Physical Education 42: 525-39.
33. Ruef, Martin, and W. Richard Scott. 1998. "A Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments." Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 877-905.
34. Rushton, Michael. 2000. "Public Funding of Controversial Art." Journal of Cultural Economics 24: 267-82.
35. Saidel, Judith R. 1991. "Resource Interdependence: The Relationship between State and Nonprofit Organizations." Public Administration Review 51: 543-53.
36. Salamon, Lester M. 1987. "Partners in Public Service: The Scope and Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations." In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, ed. W. W. Powell. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 99-116.
37. Salamon, Lester M. 1995. Partners in Public Service: Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare State. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Salamon, Lester M., ed. 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. Salamon, Lester M., S. Wojciech Sokolowski, and Regina List. 2003. Global Civil Society: An Overview. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
40. Sawers, David. 1993. Should the Taxpayer Support the Arts? Current Controversies 7. London: Institute for Economic Affairs.
41. Schuster, Mark D. 1989. "The Search for International Models: Results from Recent Comparative Research in Arts Policy." In Who's to Pay for the Arts? The International Search for Models of Arts Support, ed. Milton C. Cummings, Jr., and Mark D. Schuster. New York: ACA Books, 15-41.
42. Singh, Jitendra V., David J. Tucker, and Robert J. House. 1986. "Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness." Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 171-93.
43. Singh, Jitendra V., David J. Tucker, and Agnes G. Meinhard. 1991. "Institutional Change and Ecological Dynamics." In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, ed. Walter W. Powell, and Paul J. DiMaggio. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 390-422.
44. Smith, Steven R., and Michael Lipsky. 1993. Nonprofits for Hire: The Welfare State in the Age of Contracting. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Snavely, Keith, and Uday Desai. 2001. "Mapping Local Government-Nongovernmental Organization Interactions: A Conceptual Framework." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11: 245-63.
46. Stainton, Timothy. 1994. Autonomy and Social Policy: Rights, Mental Handicap and Community Care. Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
47. Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1965. "Social Structure and Organizations. "In The Handbook of Organizations, ed. James G. March. Chicago: Rand McNally, 142-93.
48. Suchman, Mark C. 1995. "Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches." Academy of Management Review 20: 571-610.
49. Westphal, James D., and Edward J. Zajac. 1994. "Substance and Symbolism in CEOs' Long-Term Incentive Plans." Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 367-90.
50. Wyszomirski, Margaret J. 2002. "Arts and Culture." In The State of Nonprofit America, ed. Lester M. Salamon. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 187-218.
51. Wyszomirski, Margaret J., and Kevin V. Mulcahy. 1995. "The Organization of Public Support for the Arts." In America's Commitment to Culture: Government and the Arts, ed. K. V. Mulcahy, and M. J. Wyszomirski. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 121-43.
52. Yoon, Yong-Joong. 2002. A Study on the Effects of Culture and Art Fund's Aid. Seoul: Korea Culture and Tourism Policy Institute.
53. Zimmer, Annette, and Stefan Toepler. 1999. "The Subsidized Muse: Government and the Arts in Western Europe and the United States." Journal of Cultural Economics 23: 33-49.