Enhancing the interpretation of stated choice analysis through the application of a verbal protocol assessment

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 201-221

  Cahill, Kerri L ^a   Marion, Jeffrey L ^b   Lawson, Steven R ^b  

^a NATIONAL PARK SERVICE   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acadia National Park; Recreation impact management; Stated choice; Trade off analysis; Verbal protocol

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; NATIONAL PARK; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; TRADE-OFF; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

ACADIA NATIONAL PARK; MAINE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34250727491     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222216.2007.11950105     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Anderson, D., & Louviere, J. (1993). Factors affecting user choice of National Forest recreation sites. (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station) Laramie, WY: The University of Wyoming, Department of Statistics.
2. Bates, J. (1998). Reflections on stated preference: Theory and practice. In J. Ortu Zar, D. Hensher, and S. Jara-Di Az (Eds.), Travel Behaviour Research: Updating the State of Play (pp. 105-121). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
3. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
4. Green, P., Tull, C., & Albaum, G. (1988). Research for marketing decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Hammitt, W., & Cole, D. (1998). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
6. Hanemann, W. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 332-341.
7. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2001). Solitude versus access: A study of tradeoffs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leisure Sciences, 23, 179-191.
8. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2002). Tradeoffs among social, resource and management attributes of the Denali Wilderness experience: A contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297-312.
9. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2003). Research to inform management of wilderness camping at Isle Royale National Park: Part II - prescriptive research. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 21(3), 43-56.
10. Lindberg, K., Dellaert, B., & Romer Rassing, C. (1999). Resident tradeoffs: A choice modeling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 554-559.
11. Louviere, J., Hensher, D., & Swait, J. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press
12. Louviere, J., Louviere, C., Anderson, D., & Woodworth, G. (1986). Choices among parks and forest preserves by Chicago Area Users: A study of the effects of managerially relevant park attributes on choice. (Final report to North Central Forest Experiment Station). Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa, Department of Geography.
13. Manning, R. (1999a). Crowding and carrying capacity in outdoor recreation: From normative standards to standards of quality. In E. L. Jackson and T. L. Burton (Editors), Leisure studies: prospects for The twenty-first century (pp. 323-334). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
14. Manning, R. (1999b). Studies in outdoor recreation. Oregon: Oregon State University Press.
15. Manning, R. (2003). What to do about crowding and solitude in parks and wilderness? A reply to Stewart and Cole. Journal of Leisure Research, 35, 107-119.
16. Manning, R., Morrissey, J., & Lawson, S. (2005). What's behind the numbers? Qualitative insights into normative research in outdoor recreation. Leisure Sciences 27(3): 205-224.
17. McClelland, G., Schulze, W., Lazo, J., Waldman, D., Doyle, J., Elliot, S., & Irwin, J. (1992). Methods for measuring non-use values: A contingent valuation study of groundwater cleanup. Boulder: Center for Economic Analysis, University of Colorado at Boulder.
18. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics (pp. 105-142). New York: Academic Press.
19. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
20. Morey, E., Buchanan, T., & Waldman, D. (2002). Estimating the benefits and costs to mountain bikers of changes in trail characteristics, access fees, and site closures: choice experiments and benefits transfer. Journal of Environmental Management, 64, 411-422.
21. Oh, H. (2001). Revisiting importance-performance analysis. Tourism Management, 22, 617-627.
22. Opaluch, J., Swallow, S., Weaver, T., Wessells, C., & Wichelns, D. (1993). Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: Including public preferences in current siting mechanisms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 24, 41-59.
23. Roggenbuck, J., Williams, D., & Watson, A. (1993). Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environmental Management, 17, 187-197.
24. Schkade, D., & Payne, J. (1994). How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 88-109.
25. Schlapfer, F., Schmitt, M. & Roschewitz, A. (2004). Stated preferences with and without external value cues. Paper Presented at 13th annual European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
26. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research; A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
27. Svenson, O. (1989). Eliciting and analyzing verbal protocols in process studies of judgment and decision making. In H. Montgomery and O. Svenson (Editors). Process and structure in human decision making. (pp. 65-81). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Vining, J., & Fishwick, L. (1991). An exploratory study of outdoor recreation site choices. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 114-132.
29. Wildert, S. (1998). Stated preference studies: The design affects the results. In J. Ortu Zar, D. Hensher, and S. Jara-Di Az (Eds.), Travel behaviour research: Updating the state of play (pp. 105-121). Oxford: Elsevier Science.