What to do about crowding and solitude in parks and wilderness? A reply to Stewart and Cole

Journal of Leisure Research

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 107-118

  Manning, Robert E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

Crowding; Parks; Solitude; Wilderness

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDINAL SURVEY; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; WILDERNESS AREA;

EID: 0038454738     PISSN: 00222216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18666/jlr-2003-v35-i1-612     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Anderson, D., & Brown, P. (1984). The displacement process in recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 16, 61-73.
2. Beard, J., & Ragheb, M. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 12, 20-33.
3. Bevins, M. (1992). Dissatisfied State Park campers? Proceedings of the 1991 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Forest Service General Technical Report NE-160, pp. 91-93.
4. Brewer, D., & Gillespie, G. (1967). Estimating satisfaction levels of outdoor recreationists. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 22, 248-49.
5. Burns, R., Graefe, A., & Titre, J. (1998). Customer Satisfaction at U.S. Army Corps of Engineers-administered lakes: A compilation of two years of performance data. Proceedings of the 1997 northeastern recreation research symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-241, 12-13.
6. Connelly, N. (1987). Critical factors and their threshold for camper satisfaction at two camp-grounds. Journal of Leisure Research, 29, 159-73.
7. Ditton, R., Fedler, A., & Graefe, A. (1982). Assessing recreational satisfaction among diverse participant groups. In Forest and river recreation: Research update (pp. 134-139). St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication 18.
8. Ditton, R., Graefe, A., & Fedler, A. (1981). Recreational satisfaction at Buffalo National River: Some measurement concerns. In Some recent products of river recreation research (GTR NC-63, pp. 9-17). St. Paul, MN: North Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service.
9. Dorfman, P. (1979). Measurement and meaning of recreation satisfaction: A case study of camping. Environment and Behavior, 11, 483-510.
10. Dwyer, J. (1993). Customer evaluation of campground management: Huron-Manistee National Forests. Proceedings of the 1992 northeastern recreation research symposium. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NE-176, 87-89.
11. Floyd, M. (1997). Pleasure, arousal, and dominance: exploring affective determinants of recreation satisfaction. Leisure Sciences, 19, 83-96.
12. Foster, R., & Jackson, E. (1979). Factors associated with camping satisfaction in Alberta Provincial Park campgrounds. Journal of Leisure Research, 11, 292-306.
13. Graefe, A., & Fedler, A. (1986). Situational and subjective determinants of satisfaction in marine recreational fishing. Leisure Sciences, 8, 275-95.
14. Graefe, A., Kuss, F., & Vaske, J. (1990). Visitor impact management: The planning framework. Washington, D.C.: National Parks and Conservation Association.
15. Green, P., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103-123.
16. Hammitt, W., & Patterson, M. (1991). Coping behavior to avoid visual encounters: Its relationship to wildland privacy. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 225-37.
17. Hendee, J., Stankey, G., & Lucas, R. (1990). Wilderness management. Golden Colorado: North America Press.
18. Jacobi, C., & Manning, R. (1997). Applying the visitor experience and resource protection process to Acadia National Park Carriage Roads: A summary of research and decision-making, U.S. National Park Service Technical Report NPS/NESO-RNR/NRTR/98-5.
19. Jacobi, C., & Manning, R. (1999). Crowding and conflict on the carriage roads of Acadia National Park: an application of the visitor experience and resource protection framework. Park Science, 19, 22-26.
20. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2002). Tradeoffs among social, resource, and managerial attributes of the Denali wilderness experience: a contextual approach to normative research. Leisure Sciences, 24, 297-312.
21. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2000). Crowding versus access at delicate arch, Arches National Park: an indifference analysis. Proceedings of the third symposium on social aspects and recreation research. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Press, pp. 135-143.
22. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2001a). Crossing experiential boundaries: visitor preferences regarding tradeoffs among social, resource, and managerial attributes of the Denali wilderness experience. The George Wright Forum, 18, 10-27.
23. Lawson, S., & Manning, R. (2001b). Solitude versus access: a study of tradeoffs in outdoor recreation using indifference curve analysis. Leisure Sciences, 23, 179-191.
24. Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (1990). Stated preference and choice models applied to recreation research: a review. Leisure Sciences, 12, 9-32.
25. Manning, R. (1985). Crowding norms in backcountry settings: A review and synthesis. Journal of Leisure Research, 17, 75-89.
26. Manning, R. (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
27. Manning, R. (2001a). Carrying capacity as "informed judgment": The values of science and the science of values. In W. A. Freimund and D. N. Cole (Eds). Visitor use density and wilderness experience: Proceedings. Ogden, UT: USDA Forest Service Proceedings p. 20, 21-28.
28. Manning, R. (2001b). Visitor experience and resource protection: a framework for managing the carrying capacity of national parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19, 93-108.
29. Manning, R., Jacobi, C., Valliere, W., & Wang, B. (1998). Standards of quality in parks and recreation. Parks and Recreation, 33, 88-94.
30. Manning, R., & Lawson, S. (2002). Carrying capacity as "informed judgement": The values of science and the science of values. Environmental Management, 30, 157-168.
31. Manning, R., Newman, P., Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Lawson, S. (2001). Respondent self-assessment of research on crowding norms in outdoor recreation. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 251-271.
32. Manning, R., & Valliere, W. (2001). Coping in outdoor recreation: causes and consequences of crowding and conflict among community residents. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 410-426.
33. Manning, R., Valliere, W., Minteer, B., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (2000). Crowding in parks and outdoor recreation: a theoretical, empirical, and managerial analysis. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 18, 57-72.
34. Manning, R., Valliere, W., Wang, B., & Jacobi, C. (1999). Crowding norms: Alternative measurement approaches. Leisure Sciences, 21, 219-29.
35. Merigliano, L. (1990). Indicators to monitor the wilderness recreation experience. In D. Lime (Ed.), Managing America's enduring wilderness resource (pp. 152-152). St. Paul: University of Minnesota.
36. Nash, R. (2001). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
37. National Park Service. (1997). VERP: The visitor experience and resource protection (VERP) framework-A handbook for planners and managers. Denver, CO: Denver Service Center.
38. Outdoor Recreation Resources Review Commission (ORRRC). (1962). Outdoor recreation for America. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39. Robertson, R., & Regula, J. (1994). Recreational displacement and overall satisfaction: A study of central Iowa's licensed boaters. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 174-81.
40. Runte, A. (1997). National Parks: The American experience. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska Press.
41. Schomaker, J. (1984). Writing quantifiable river recreation management objectives. Proceedings of the 1984 National River Recreation Symposium, 249-53.
42. Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
43. Stankey, G., Cole, D., Lucas, R., Peterson, M., Frissell, S., & Washburne, R. (1985). The limits of acceptable change (LAC) system for wilderness planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-176.
44. Stewart, W., & D. Cole. (2001). Number of encounters and experience quality in Grand Canyon backcountry: consistently negative and weak relationships. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 106-120.
45. Vaske, J., Donnelly, M., & Heberlein, T. (1980). Perceptions of crowding and resource quality by early and more recent visitors. Leisure Sciences, 3, 367-81.
46. Vaske, J., Donnelly, M., Heberlein, T., & Shelby, B. (1982). Differences in reported satisfaction ratings by consumptive and nonconsumptive recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research, 14, 195-206.
47. Vaske, J., Graefe, A., Shelby, B., & Heberlein, T. (1986). Backcountry encounter norms: theory, method, and empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 18, 137-153.
48. Vaske, J., Donnelly, M., & Williamson, B. (1991). Monitoring for quality control in state park management. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 9, 59-72.
49. Warzecha, C., Manning, R., Lime, D., & Freimund, W. (2001). Diversity in outdoor recreation: planning and managing a spectrum of visitor opportunities in and among parks. The George Wright Forum, 18, 99-111.
50. Whittaker, D., & Shelby, B. (1992). Developing good standards: criteria, characteristics, and sources. In B. Shelby, G. Stankey, and B. Schindler (Eds.). Defining wilderness quality: The role of standards in wilderness management-A workshop proceeding (GTR PNW-305, pp. 6-12). Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service.
51. Williams, D. R., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Bange, S. (1991). The effect of norm-encounter compatibility on crowding perceptions, experience and behavior in river recreation settings. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 154-172.