The effects of contracting, litigation, regulation, and tax costs on conditional and unconditional conservatism: Cross-sectional evidence at the firm level

Accounting Review

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 759-796

  Qiang, Xinrong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

Author keywords

Conditional conservatism; Contracting; Taxation; Unconditional conservatism

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250709054     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.3.759     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ahmed, A. S., B. K. Billings, R. Morton, and M. Harris. 2002. The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review 77: 867-890.
2. Ball, R., S. P. Kothari, and A. Robin. 2000. The effect of international institutional factors on properties of accounting earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 29: 1-51.
3. _, A. Robin, and J. S. Wu. 2003. Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36: 235-270.
4. _, _, and G. Sadka. 2005. Is accounting conservatism due to debt or equity markets? An international test of "contracting" and "value relevance" theories of accounting. Working paper, University of Chicago.
5. _, and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in U.K. private firms: Comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 83-128.
6. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 3-37.
7. _, L. Hwang, and C. Jan. 2001a. Differences in conservatism between Big 8 and non-Big 8 auditors. Working paper, Baruch College and California State University, Hayward.
8. _, _, and _. 2001b. Auditor conservatism and quarterly earnings. Working paper, Baruch College.
9. _. 2005. Discussion of: Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 10: 311-321.
10. Beaver, W. H., and S. G. Ryan. 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38: 127-148.
11. _, and _. 2005. Conditional and unconditional conservatism: Concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies 10: 269-309.
12. Becker, C. L., M. L. DeFond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15: 1-24.
13. Beekes, W., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2004. The link between earnings timeliness, earnings conservatism and board composition: Evidence from the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12: 47-59.
14. Beneish, M. D. 1999. Incentives and penalties related to earnings overstatements that violate GAAP. The Accounting Review 74: 425-457.
15. Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 99-126.
16. Bushman, R. M., and J. D. Piotroski. 2006. Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 107-148.
17. Chandra, U., C. Wasley, and G. Waymire. 2004. Income conservatism in the U.S. technology sector. Working paper, University of Rochester.
18. Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and consequences of earnings manipulations: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13: 1-36.
19. DeFond, M. L. and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 145-176.
20. _, and C. W. Park. 1997. Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23: 115-139.
21. Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72: 1-33.
22. Dichev, I. D., and D. J. Skinner. 2002. Large sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research 40: 1091-1123.
23. Easton, P., and J. Pae. 2004. Accounting conservatism and the relation between returns and accounting data. Review of Accounting Studies 9: 495-521.
24. Feltham, G. A., and J. A. Ohlson. 1996. Uncertainty resolution and the theory of depreciation measurement. Journal of Accounting Research 34: 209-234.
25. Francis, J., D. Philbrick, and K. Schipper. 1994a. Determinants and outcomes in class action securities litigation. Working paper, University of Chicago.
26. _, _, and _. 1994b. Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 32: 137-164.
27. _, E. L. Maydew, and H. C. Sparks. 1999. The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 18: 17-34.
28. Givoly, D., and C. Hayn. 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29: 287-320.
29. _, _, and A. Natarajan. 2006. Measuring reporting conservatism. Working paper, The Pennsylvania State University.
30. Gopalakrishnan, V. and M. Parkash. 1995. Borrower and lender perceptions of accounting information in corporate lending agreements. Accounting Horizons 9: 13-26.
31. Guay, W. R., and R. E. Verrecchia. 2006. Discussion of: An economic framework for conservative accounting and Bushman and Piotroski (2006). Journal of Accounting and Economics 42: 149-165.
32. Gul, F. A., J. S. L. Tsui, and D. S. Dhaliwal. 2006. Non-audit services, auditor quality and the value relevance of earnings. Accounting and Finance 46 (5): 797-817.
33. Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 85-107.
34. Holthausen, R. W., and R. L. Watts. 2001. The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 3-75.
35. _. 2003. Testing the relative power of accounting standards versus incentives and other institutional features to influence the outcome of financial reporting in an international setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36: 271-283.
36. Huijgen, C., and M. Lubberink. 2005. Earnings conservatism, litigation and contracting: The case of cross-listed firms. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 32: 1275-1309.
37. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.
38. Johnson, M. F., R. Kasznik, and K. K. Nelson. 2001. The impact of securities litigation reform on the disclosure of forward-looking information by high technology firms. Journal of Accounting Research 39: 297-327.
39. Jones, C., and S. Weingram. 1996. The determinants of 10b-5 litigation risk. Working paper, Stanford University.
40. Jones, F. L., and K. Raghunandan. 1998. Client risk and recent changes in the market for audit services. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17: 169-181.
41. Kellogg, R. L. 1984. Accounting activities, security prices, and class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6: 185-204.
42. Khurana, I. K., and K. K. Raman. 2004. Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus Non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review 79: 473-495.
43. Klein, A. 2002. Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 375-400.
44. Krishnan, J., and J. Krishnan. 1997. Litigation risk and auditor resignations. The Accounting Review 72: 539-560.
45. Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107-138.
46. McNichols, M. F. 2000. Research design issues in earnings management studies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19: 313-345.
47. Palmrose, Z-V. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63: 55-73.
48. Penman, S., and X. J. Zhang. 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review 77: 237-264.
49. Pratt, J., and J. D. Stice. 1994. The effects of client characteristics on auditor litigation risk judgments, required audit evidence, and recommended audit fees. The Accounting Review 69: 639-656.
50. Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings management and the performance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50: 101-122.
51. Roychowdhury, S., and R. L. Watts. 2006. Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, market-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting. Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
52. Safdar, I. 2003. Stock option exercise, earnings management, and abnormal stock returns. Working paper, University of Rochester.
53. Shackelford, D. A., and T. Shevlin. 2001. Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 321-387.
54. Sivakumar, K., and G. Waymire. 2003. Enforceable accounting rules and income measurement by early 20th century railroads. Journal of Accounting Research 41: 397-444.
55. Sloan, R. G. 2001. Financial accounting and corporate governance: A discussion. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32: 335-347.
56. Sweeney, A. P. 1994. Debt-covenant violations and managers' accounting responses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 281-308.
57. Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998a. Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50: 63-99.
58. _, _, and _. 1998b. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 53: 1935-1974.
59. Watts, R. L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons 17: 207-221.
60. Zmijewski, M. E., and R. L. Hagerman. 1981. An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard setting/choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 129-149.