The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs

Accounting Review

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 867-890

  Ahmed, Anwer S ^a   Billings, Bruce K ^a   Morton, Richard M ^a   Stanford Harris, Mary ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accounting conservatism; Cost of debt; Dividend policy conflicts

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036808449     PISSN: 00014826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.867     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altman, E. 1992. Revising the high-yield bond market. Financial Management 21 (2): 89-92.
2. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (1): 3-38.
3. Beaver, W., and S. Ryan. 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-to-market ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38 (1): 127-148.
4. Begley, J. 1994. Restrictive covenants included in public debt agreements: An empirical investigation. Working paper, University of British Columbia.
5. Black, F. 1976. The dividend puzzle. Journal of Portfolio Management 2 (2): 5-8.
6. Botosan, C. 1997. Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. The Accounting Review 72 (3): 323-349.
7. Dechow, P.M., and R.M. Sloan. 1997. Returns to contrarian investment strategies: Tests of naive expectations hypotheses. Journal of Financial Economics 43 (1): 3-27.
8. Devine, C. 1963. The rule of conservatism reexamined. Journal of Accounting Research 1 (2): 127-138.
9. El-Gazzar, S., and V. Pastena. 1990. Negotiated accounting rules in private financial contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (4): 381-396.
10. _, and _. 1991. Factors affecting the scope and initial tightness of covenant restrictions in private lending agreements. Contemporary Accounting Research 8 (1): 132-151.
11. Feltham G., and J. Ohlson. 1995. Valuation and clean surplus accounting for operating and financial activities. Contemporary Accounting Research 11 (2): 689-731.
12. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). 1974. Accounting for Research and Development Costs. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2. Stamford, CT: FASB.
13. _. 1980. Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 2. Stamford, CT: FASB.
14. _. 1985. Elements of Financial Statements. Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6. Stamford, CT: FASB.
15. Givoly, D., and C. Hayn. 2000. The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics 29 (3): 287-320.
16. Hand, J.R.M., R. Holthausen, and R. Leftwich. 1992. The effect of bond rating agency announcement on bond and stock prices. Journal of Finance 47 (2): 733-753.
17. Healy, M., and K. Palepu. 1990. Effectiveness of accounting-based dividend covenants. Journal of Accounting and Economics 12 (1-3): 97-123.
18. Hendriksen, E., and M. Van Breda. 1992. Accounting Theory. 5th edition. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
19. Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (4): 305-360.
20. Kalay, A. 1982. Stockholder-bondholder conflict and dividend constraints. Journal of Financial Economics 10 (2): 211-233.
21. Kaplan, R., and G. Urwitz. 1979. Statistical models of bond ratings: A methodological inquiry. Journal of Business 52 (2): 231-261.
22. Leftwich, R. 1983. Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review 58 (1): 23-42.
23. Leuz, C., D. Deller, and M. Stubenrath. 1998. An international comparison of accounting-based payout restrictions in the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany. Accounting and Business Research 28 (2): 111-129.
24. Lin, P., F. Seyyed, and S. Smith. 1999. The independent impact of credit rating changes: The case of Moody's rating refinement on yield premiums. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 26 (34): 337-363.
25. Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics, Organization & Management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Moehrle, S. 2002. Do firms use restructuring charge reversals to meet earnings targets? The Accounting Review 77 (2): 397-414.
27. Mohrman, M. 1996. The use of fixed GAAP provisions in debt contracts. Accounting Horizons 10 (3): 78-91.
28. Muller, K., III, and E. Riedl. 2001. Using stock returns to determine bad versus good news to examine conservatism of accounting earnings. Working paper, Pennsylvania State University.
29. Penman, S., and X. Zhang. 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review 77 (2): 237-264.
30. Ryan, S. 1995. A model of accrual measurement with implications for the evolution of the book-to-market ratio. Journal of Accounting Research 33 (1): 95-112.
31. Sengupta, P. 1998. Corporate disclosure quality and the cost of debt. The Accounting Review 73 (4): 459-474.
32. Shon, J. 2000. Implications of conservative accounting choice on the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Working paper, University of Chicago.
33. Smith, C., and J. Warner. 1979. On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics 7 (2): 117-161.
34. Standard & Poor's, Inc. 1986. Debt Ratings Criteria. New York, NY: Standard & Poor's Corporation.
35. Sterling, R. 1967. Conservatism: The fundamental principle of valuation in traditional accounting. Abacus 3 (2): 109-132.
36. Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53 (1): 112-134.
37. _. 1993. A proposal for research on conservatism. Working paper, University of Rochester.
38. White, M. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 40: 817-838.
39. Zmijewski, M., and R. Hagerman. 1981. An income strategy approach to the positive theory of accounting standard setting/choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2): 129-149.