Validation of the breast evaluation questionnaire [7]

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 120, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 352-353

  Pusic, Andrea L ^a   Klassen, Anne ^b   Cano, Stefan J ^c   Kerrigan, Carolyn L ^d  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST REDUCTION; BREAST SURGERY; HUMAN; LETTER; MASTECTOMY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

BODY IMAGE; BREAST DISEASES; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROGNOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34250707372     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000264569.63355.f1     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Cogwell Anderson, R., Cunningham, B., Tafesse, E., and Lenderking, W. R. Validation of the Breast Evaluation Questionnaire for use with breast surgery patients. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 597, 2006.
2. Cano, S. J., Browne, J., and Lamping, D. L. Patientbased measures of outcome in plastic surgery: Current approaches and future directions. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 57: 1, 2004.
3. Pusic, A. L., Cano, S., Klassen, A., et al. Measuring quality of life in breast surgery: Where are we now and where do we go from here? Abstract presented at the International Society of Quality of Life Research Annual Meeting, Lisbon, October 2006.
4. Rubin, L., Cano, S., Klassen, A., et al. What motivates women to undergo breast surgery? A comparative study of body image, barriers and quality of life in three surgical groups. Abstract presented at the International Society of Quality of Life Research Annual Meeting, Lisbon, October 2006.
5. Medical Outcomes Trust. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual. Life Res. 11: 193, 2002.
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims: United States Food and Drug Administration Draft Guidance for Industry. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, February 2006.
7. Pusic, A. L., Chen, C. M., Cano, S., et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. (in press).