Event related potentials (ERP) and behavioral measurements to verbal stimulation of visual fields

Cortex

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 511-523

  Itzchak, Esther Ben ^a   Babkoff, Harvey ^a   Faust, Miriam ^a  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Hemispheres; Lexical decision; N100; P300; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE ABILITY; LATENT PERIOD; LEFT HEMISPHERE; LINGUISTICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBALIZATION; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 34250654426     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70245-4     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. ALEXANDER JA, BAUER LO, KUPERMAN S, MOZORATI S, O'CONNOR S, PROJESZ B, BEGLEITER H and POLICH J. P300 hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task. Psychophysiology, 32: 467-475, 1995.
2. BABKOFF H and BEN-URIAH Y. Lexical decision time as a function of visual field and stimulus probability. Cortex, 19: 13-30, 1983.
3. BABKOFF H and FAUST M. Lexical Decision and visual hemifield and examination of the RT accuracy relationship. Neuropsychologia, 6: 711-725, 1988.
4. BABKOFF H, FAUST M and LAVIDOR M. Lexical decision, visual hernifield and angle of orientation. Neuropsychologia, 35: 487-495, 1997.
5. BALOTA DA and CHUMBLEY JI. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word recognition in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human, Perception and Performance, 10: 340-357, 1977.
6. BARNEA A, LAMM O, EPSTEIN R and PRATT H. Brain potentials from dyslexic children recorded during short term memory tasks. International Journal of Neuroscience, 74: 227-237, 1994.
7. BEAUREGARD M, CHERTKOW H, MURTHA S, HOSEIN C and EVANS A. The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexicon: A positron emission tomography study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9: 441-461, 1997.
8. BENTIN S and FEINSOD M. Hemispheric asymmetry for word perception: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Psychophysiology, 20: 489-497, 1983
9. BRADLEY DC and GARRETT ME Hemispheric differences in the recognition of closed and open class words. Neuropsychologia, 21: 155-159, 1983.
10. BRADSHAW JL, NETTELTON JC and TAYLOR MJ. The use of laterally presented words in research into cerebral asymmetry. Is directional scanning likely to be a source of artifact? Brain and Language, 14: 1-4, 1981.
11. BRAND N, VAN-BELKKUM I, STUMPEL M and KROEZE JH. Word matching and lexical decision: A visual half field study. Brain and Language, 18: 199-211, 1983.
12. BROWN WS and JEEVES MA. Bilateral visual field processing and evoked potential interhemispheric transmission time. Neuropsychologia, 31: 1267-1281, 1993.,
13. CARR T, DAVIDSON BJ and HAWKINS HL. Perceptual flexibility in word recognition: Strategies affect orthographic computation but not lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4: 674-690, 1978.
14. CHERTKOW H and MURTHA S. PET activation and language. Clinical Neuroscience, 4: 78-86, 1997.
15. CHIARELLO C. Hemispheric dynamic in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming. Brain and Language, 26: 146-72, 1985.
16. CHIARELLO C. Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: A review of visual half field research. In Whitaker HA (Ed), Contemporary Reviews in Neuropsychlogy. New-York: Springer-Verlag, 1988.
17. CHIARELLO C, DRONKERS NF and HARDYCK C. Choosing sides. On the variability of language lateralization in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 22: 363-374, 1984.
18. CHIARELLO C and NUDING S. Visual fields effects for processing content and function words. Neuropsychologia, 25: 539-548, 1987.
19. CHIARELLO C, SENEHEI J and SOULIER M. Viewing conditions and hemisphere asymmetry for lexical decision. Neuropsychlogia, 24: 1511-1530, 1986.
20. CLARKE JM, HALGREN E and CAHUVEL P. Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task: 1. Occipital and peri-rolandic recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110: 1210-1225, 1999a.
21. CLARKE JM, HALGREN E and CAHUVEL P. Intracranial ERPs in humans during a lateralized visual oddball task: 2. Temporal parietal and frontal recordings. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110: 1226-1244, 1999b.
22. DONCHIN E. Surprise!... Surprise? Psychophysiology, 18: 493-513, 1981.
23. DONCHIN E and COLES MG. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Science, 11: 406-425, 1988.
24. DOYLE MC and RUGG MD. Word repetition within and across-visual fields: An event related potential study. Neuropsychologia, 36: 1403-1415, 1998.
25. EIMER M. The Nepc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. Electrophysiology and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99: 225-234, 1996.
26. FAUST M, KRAVETZ S and BABKOFF H. Hemisphericity and top-down processing of language. Brain and Language, 44: 1-18, 1993a.
27. FAUST M, KRAVETZ S and BABKOFF H. Hemispheric specialization or reading habits: Evidence from lexical decision research with Hebrew words and sentences. Brain and Language, 44: 254-263, 1993b.
28. FEDERMEIER KD and KUTAS M. Right words and left words. Electrophysiological evidence for hemispheric differences in meaning processing. Cognitive Brain Research, 8: 373-392, 1999.
29. FROST JA, BINDER JR, SPRINGER JA, HAMMEKE TA, BELLGOWAN PS, RAO SM and COX RW. Language processing is strongly left lateralized in both sexes. Evidence from functional MRI. Brain, 122: 199-208, 1999.
30. GOLDSTEIN A and BABKOFF H. A comparison of upper vs. lower and right vs. left visual field using lexical decision. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Expiremental Psychology, 54A: 1239-1259, 2001.
31. GOODIN DS, WALTZ DA and AMINOFF MJ. Task-dependent hemisphere asymmetries of the visual evoked potentials. Neurology, 35: 378-384, 1989.
32. HARDYCK C. Shadow and substance: Attentional irrelevancies and perceptual constraints in the hemispheric processing of language stimuli. In Kitterle FL (Ed), Cerebral Laterality: Theory and Research. New-Jersey: Hillsdale, 1991.
33. HARDYCK C, CHIARELLO C, DRONKERS NF and SIMPSON GV. Orienting attention whiten visual fields: How efficient is interhemispheric transfer? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11: 650-666, 1985.
34. HEILMAN KM. Attention asymmetries. In Davidson RJ and Hugdahl K (Eds), Brain Asymmetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
35. HILLYARD SA and MUNTE TF. Selective attention to color and location: An analysis with event related brain potentials. Perception and Psychophysics, 36: 185-198, 1984.
36. HOWELL JR and BRYDEN MP. The effects of word orientation and imagibility on visual half field with lexical decision task. Neuropsychologia, 25: 527-538, 1987.
37. JOHNSON R JR. Developmental evidence for modality-dependent P300 generators: A normative study. Psychophysiology, 26: 651-667, 1989.
38. KANSAKU K, YAMAURA A and KITAZAWA S. Sex differences in lateralization revealed in the posterior language areas. Cerebral Cortex, 10: 866-872, 2000.
39. KATAYAMA J and POLICH J. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology, 35: 23-33, 1998.
40. KAYSER J, BRUDER GE, TENKE CE, STEWART JE and QUITKiN FM. Event related potentials (ERPs) to hernifield presentations of emotional stimuli: Differences between depressed patients and healthy adults in P3 amplitude and asymmetry. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 36: 211-236, 2000.
41. KING JW, GAMIS G and KUTAS M. Potential asymmetries in language comprehension in search of the electrical right. In Chiarello C and Beeman M (Eds), Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. New-Jersey: ErIbaum, 1998.
42. KOK A and ROOYAKKERS JA. ERPs to laterally presented pictures and words in a semantic categorization task. Psychophysiology, 23: 672-683, 1986.
43. KOK A, VAN DE VIJVER FR and BAUMA A. Laterality effects of visual field and matching instruction on event related potentials and reaction time. Brain and Cognition, 4: 377-387, 1985a.
44. KOK A, VAN DE VIJVER FR and ROOYAKKERS JA. Effects of visual fields, stimulus degradation and level of practice on event related potentials of the brain. Psychophysiology, 22: 707-717, 1985b.
45. KRUEGER LE. The word- superiority effect and phonological recording. Memory and Cognition, 20: 685-694, 1992.
46. KUTAS M, MCCARTHY G and DONCHIN E. Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. Science, 197: 792-795, 1977.
47. KUTAS M and VAN-PETTEN C. Psycholinguistic electrified: Event related brain potentials investigation. In Grensbacher MA (Ed), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. New-York: Academic Press, 1995.
48. LAVIDOR M, BABKOFF H and FAUST M. Analysis of standard and non-standard visual word format in the two hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 39: 430-439, 2001.
49. LEUTHOLD H. Postperceptual effects and P300 latency. Psychophysiology, 35: 34-46, 1998.
50. LUH KE and LEVY J. Interhemispheric cooperation: Left is left and right is right, but sometimes the two shall meet. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21: 243-258, 1995.
51. MANGUN GR and BUCK LA. Sustained visual spatial attention produces costs and benefits in response time and evoked neural activity. Neuropsychologia, 36: 189-200, 1998.
52. MCCARTHY G and DONCHIN E. A metric of thought. A comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science, 21: 77-80, 1981.
53. MCCARTHY G and NOBRE AC. Modulation of semantic processing by spatial selective attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88: 210-219, 1993.
54. MCGLONE J. Sex different in human brain asymmetry: A critical survey. Behavioral and Brain Science, 3: 215-263, 1980.
55. MECKLINGER A, MAESS B, PFEIFER E, CHEYNE D and WEINBERG H. A MEG analysis of the P300 in visual discrimination tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 108: 45-56, 1998.
56. MONDOR TA and BRYDEN MP. On the relation between visual spatial attention and visual field asymmetries. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44A: 529-555, 1992.
57. MOORES KA, CLARK CR, HADFIELD LM, BROWN GC, TAYLOR DJ, FITZGIBBON SP, LEWIS AC, WEBER DL and GREENBLATT R. Investigating the generators of the scalp recorded visuo-verbal P300 using cortically constrained source localization. Human Brain Mapping, 18: 53-77, 2003.
58. NELSON CA, COLLINS PF and TORRES F. The lateralization of language comprehension using event related potentials. Brain and Cognition, 14: 92-112, 1990.
59. NEVILLE, HJ, KUTAS M and SCHMIDT AC. Event related brain potentials studies of cerebral specialization during reading. Studies of normal adults. Brain and Language, 16: 300-315, 1982.
60. NOWICKA A, GRABOWSKA A and FERSTEN E. Interhemispheric transmission of information and functional asymmetry of the human brain. Neuropsychologia, 34: 147-151, 1996.
61. POLICH J and HOFFMAN LD. P300 and handedness: On the possible contribution of corpus callosal size to ERPs. Psychophysiology, 35: 497-507, 1998.
62. PROVERBIO AM and ZANI A. Electrophysiological indexes of illusory contours perception in humans. Neuropsychologia, 40: 479-491, 2002.
63. RUGG MD, KOK A, BARRETT G and FISCHLER I. ERPs associated with language and hemispheric specialization. A review. In Mccallum CR, Zappoli R and Denoth J (Eds), Cerebral Psychophysiology: Studies in Event Related Potentials. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1986.
64. SAMAR VJ. Multidimentional influences of cerebral asymmetries and cognitive skills. Brain and Cognition, 2: 355-382, 1983.
65. SCHWARTZ S and KIRSHER K. Behavioral or hemispheric asymmetry. Is there a default option? Brain and Cognition, 5: 377-384, 1986.
66. SCHWEINBERGER SR, SOMMER W and STILLER MR. Event Related Potentials and models of performance asymmetries in face and word recognition. Neuropsychologia, 32: 175-191, 1994.
67. SHANON B. Lateralization effects in lexical decision tasks. Brain and Language, 8: 380-387, 1979.
68. SHAYWITZ BA, SHAYWITZ SA, PUGH KR, CONSTABLE RT, SKUDLARSKI P, FULBRIGHT RK, BRONEN RA, FLETCHER JM, SHANKWEITER DP, KATZ H and GORES JC. Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature, 373: 607-609, 1995.
69. SMULDERS FT, KENEMANS JL, SCHMIDT WF and KOK A. Effects of task complexity in young and old adults: Reaction time and P300 latency are not always dissociated. Psychophysiology, 36: 118-125, 1999.
70. TRESSOLDI PE and CUSUMANO S. Visual evoked potentials related to behavioral asymmetries during foveal attention in the two extrapersonal hemispheres. Brain and Cognition, 18: 125-137, 1992.
71. ULLSPERGER P and MECKLINGER A. P300 as index of cognitive adaptation. In Ogura C, Koga Y, and Shimokoch M (Eds), Recent Advances in Event Related Brain Potential Research. New-York: Elsevier, 1996.
72. VAN PETTEN C and KUTAS M. ne use of event related potentials in the study of brain asymmetries. International Journal of Neuroscience, 39: 91-99, 1988.
73. VAN-STRIEN JW, LICHT R, BAUMA A and BAKKER DJ. Event related potentials during word reading and figure matching in left handed and right handed males and females. Brain and Language, 37: 525-547, 1989.
74. ZIEGLER JC, BESSON M, JACOBS AM, NAZIR TA and CARR TH. Word, pseudoword, and non-word processing: A multitask comparison using event related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9: 758-775, 1997.
75. ZIEGLER JC and JACOBS AM. Phonological information provides early sources of constraint in the processing of letter strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 35: 567-593, 1995.