Adhesion to Tooth Structure Mediated by Contemporary Bonding Systems

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 677-694

  Stangel, Ivan ^a,b   Ellis, Thomas H ^c   Sacher, Edward ^d  

^a BioMat Sciences   (United States)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^d ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; RESIN;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTIN; HUMANS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 34250646638     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2007.04.007     Document Type: Review

References (74)

1. Buonocore M.G. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34 6 (1955) 849-853
2. Gilpatrick R.Q., Ross J.A., and Simonsen R.J. Resin-to-enamel bond strength with various etching times. Quintessence Int 22 1 (1991) 47-49
3. Gwinnett A.J., and Kanca J. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 5 2 (1992) 73-77
4. Shaffer S.E., Barkmeier W.W., and Kelsey W.P. Effects of reduced acid conditioning time on enamel microleakage. Gen Dent 35 4 (1987) 278-280
5. Pashley D.H., Carvalho R.M., Sano H., et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1 4 (1999) 299-309
6. Miranda C., Prates L.H., Vieira Rde S., et al. Shear bond strength of different adhesive systems to primary dentin and enamel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31 1 (2006) 35-40
7. Kamada K., Yoshida K., Taira Y., et al. Shear bond strengths of four resin bonding systems to two silica-based machinable ceramic materials. Dent Mater J 25 3 (2006) 621-625
8. Arias V.G., Ambrosano G.M.B., and Pimneta L.A.F. Determination of the sample and plot size for microtensile testing. [abstract 818]. J Dent Res 85 spec issue A (2006) 85. http://iadr.com/publications/citingelectronic.html Available at: http://iadr.com/publications/citingelectronic.html
9. Türkün S.L. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 31 8 (2003) 527-534
10. Di Renzo M., El Feninat F., Jiménez-Esquivel B., et al. Adhesion to dentin: the role of chemical reactions in surface modification. Can J Chem 76 1 (1998) 1-6
11. Moszner N., Salz U., and Zimmerman J. Chemical aspects of self-etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 21 10 (2005) 895-910
12. Yavari M. Investigations of phosphatemediated adhesion to dentin surfaces. Montreal (Quebec, Canada): McGill University; 1999. p. 44-52.
13. Yoshida Y., Van Meerbeek B., Nakayama Y., et al. Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res 80 6 (2001) 1565-1569
14. th edition (1998), Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis (MO) p. 1
15. Di Renzo M., Ellis T.H., Sacher E., et al. A photoacoustic FTIRS study of the chemical modifications of human dentin surfaces: I. Demineralization. Biomaterials 22 8 (2001) 787-792
16. Habelitz S., Marshall S.J., Marshall Jr. G.W., et al. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 46 2 (2001) 173-183
17. Breschi L., Gobbi P., Mazzotti G., et al. Field emission in-lens SEM study of enamel and dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 46 3 (1999) 315-323
18. In: Thylstrup A., Leach S.A., and Qvist V. (Eds). Dentine and dentine reactions in the oral cavity (1987), IRL Press, Ltd, Oxford (UK) 17-26
19. Ritter A.V., Swift Jr. E.J., and Yamauchi M. Effects of phosphoric acid and glutaraldehyde-HEMA on dentin collagen. Eur J Oral Sci 109 5 (2001) 348-353
20. DiRenzo M., Ellis T.H., Sacher E., et al. Adhesion to mineralized tissue: bonding to human dentin. Prog Surf Sci 50 1 (1995) 407-418
21. LeGeros R.Z. Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine (1991), Karger, Basel (Switzerland)
22. Chahal O., Stangel I., Ellis T., et al. The effect of pH and acid anion of protein loss from dentin. [abstract 2630]. J Dent Res 75 special issue (1996) 346
23. Barkmeier W.W., and Erickson R.L. Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using scotchbond multi-purpose. Am J Dent 7 3 (1994) 175-179
24. Pashley D., and Tay F.R. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater 17 5 (2001) 430-444
25. Perdigao J., and Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 15 1 (2003) 32-41
26. Perdigao J., Gomes G., Duarte Jr. S., et al. Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer. Oper Dent 30 4 (2005) 492-499
27. Miguez P.A., Castro P.S., Nunes M.F., et al. Effect of acid-etching on the enamel bond of two self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent 5 2 (2003) 107-112
28. Torii Y., Itou K., Nishitani Y., et al. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 15 5 (2002) 305-308
29. Van Landuyt K.L., Peumans M., De Munck J., et al. Extension of a one-step self-etch adhesive into a multi-step adhesive. Dent Mater 22 6 (2006) 533-544
30. Lopes G.C., Baratieri C.M., Baratieri L.N., et al. Bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: effect of acid etching time. J Adhes Dent 6 1 (2004) 19-23
31. Di Renzo M., Ellis T.H., Domingue A., et al. Chemical reactions between dentin and bonding agents. J Adhes 47 1 (1994) 115-121
32. Fukuda R., Yoshida Y., Nakayama Y., et al. Bonding efficacy of polyalkenoic acids to hydroxyapatite, enamel and dentin. Biomaterials 24 11 (2003) 1861-1867
33. Inoue S., Abe Y., Yoshida Y., et al. Effect of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent 29 6 (2004) 685-692
34. Yip H.K., Tay F.R., Ngo H.C., et al. Bonding of contemporary glass ionomer cements to dentin. Dent Mater 17 5 (2001) 546-570
35. Nakabayashi N., Kojima K., and Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrate. J Biomed Mater Res 16 3 (1982) 265-273
36. Gwinnett A.J. Qualitative contribution of resin infiltration/hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent 6 1 (1993) 7-9
37. Nakabayashi N., Nakamura M., and Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 3 4 (1991) 133-138
38. Gwinnett A.J., Tay F.R., Pang K.M., et al. Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. Am J Dent 9 4 (1996) 140-144
39. Prati C., Chersoni S., and Pashley D.H. Effect of removal of surface collagen fibril on resin-dentin bonding. Dent Mater 15 5 (1999) 323-331
40. Phrukkanon S., Burrow M.F., Hartley P.G., et al. The influence of the modification etched bovine dentin on bond strengths. Dent Mater 16 4 (2000) 255-265
41. Silva C.H., Guenka Palma Dibb R., Sincler Delfino C., et al. Bonding performance of different adhesive systems to deproteinized dentin: microtensile bond strength and scanning electron microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 75 1 (2005) 158-167
42. Abnar M., and Farely E.P. Potential use of organic polyphophonates as adhesives in the restoration of teeth. J Dent Res 53 (1974) 879-888
43. Munksgaard E.C., and Asmussen E. Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 63 (1984) 1087-1089
44. Stangel I., Ostro E., Domingue A., et al. Photoacoustic fourier transform IR spectroscopic study of polymer-dentin interaction. In: Pireaux J.J., Bertrand P., and Bredas J.L. (Eds). An international conference on polymer-solid interfaces (1992), Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol (England) 157-167
45. Xu J., Stangel I., Butler I.S., et al. An FT-Raman spectroscopic investigation of dentin and collagen surfaces modified by 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate. J Dent Res 76 1 (1997) 596-601
46. Asmussen E., and Uno S. Adhesion of restorative resins to dentin: chemical and physicochemical aspects. Oper Dent Suppl 5 (1992) 68-74
47. Kugel G., and Ferrari M. The science of bonding: from first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 131 Suppl (2000) 20-25
48. Jacobsen T., Ma R., and Soderholm K.J. Dentin bonding through interpenetrating network formation. Transactions of the Academy of Dental Materials 7 (1994) 45-52
49. Nakabayashi N., and Takarada K. The effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 8 2 (1992) 125-130
50. Fong W., and Grunwald E. Acid dissociation in acetone-water mixtures: an anomalous medium effect when London dispersion forces are large. J Phys Chem 73 11 (1969) 3909-3912
51. Mohan B., and Kandaswamy D. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentin: an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 36 7-8 (2005) 511-521
52. Abate P.F., Rodriguez V.I., and Macchi R.L. Evaporation of solvent in one-bottle adhesives. J Dent 28 6 (2000) 437-440
53. Perdigao J., Swift Jr. E.J., and Lopes G.C. Effects of repeated use on bond strengths of one-bottle adhesives. Quintessence Int 30 12 (1999) 819-823
54. Pashley D.H., Agee K.A., Nakajima M., et al. Solvent-induced dimensional changes in EDTA-demineralized dentin matrix. J Biomed Mater Res 56 2 (2001) 273-281
55. El Feninat F., Ellis T.H., Sacher E., et al. A tapping mode AFM study of collapse and denaturation in dentinal collagen. Dent Mater 17 4 (2001) 284-288
56. El Feninat F., Ellis T.H., Sacher E., et al. Moisture-dependent renaturation of collagen in phosphoric acid etched human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 42 4 (1998) 549-553
57. Imazato S., McCabe J.F., Tarumi H., et al. Degree of conversion of composites measured by DTA and FTIR. Dent Mater 17 2 (2001) 178-183
58. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., et al. Buonocore memorial lecture: adhesion to enamel and dentin. Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28 3 (2003) 215-235
59. Spencer P., Wang Y., Walker M.P., et al. Interfacial chemistry of the dentin/adhesive bond. J Dent Res 79 7 (2000) 1458-1463
60. Miyazaki M., Onose H., and Moore B.K. Analysis of the dentin-resin interface by use of laser Raman spectroscopy. Dent Mater 18 8 (2002) 576-580
61. Sano H., Shono T., Takatsu T., et al. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent 19 (1994) 59-64
62. Jacobsen T., and Soderholm K.J. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 11 2 (1995) 132-136
63. Gregoire G.L., Akon B.A., and Millas A. Interfacial micromorphological differences in hybrid layer formation between water- and solvent-based dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 87 6 (2002) 633-641
64. Salz U., Zimmermann J., Zeuner F., et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent 7 2 (2005) 107-116
65. Pashley D.H., Carvalho R.M., Sano H., et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1 (2001) 299-309
66. Inoue S., Vargas M.A., Abe Y., et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 3 3 (2001) 237-245
67. Yap U.J., Stokes A.N., and Pearson G.J. Concepts of adhesion: a review. N Z Dent J 90 401 (1994) 92-98
68. Peumans M., Kanumilli P., De Munck J., et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21 9 (2005) 864-881
69. Spencer P., and Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 62 3 (2002) 447-456
70. Stangel I., and Barolet R.Y. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins: two-year results. J Oral Rehabil 17 3 (1990) 257-268
71. Ratih D.N., Palamara J.E., and Messer H.H. Dentinal fluid flow and cuspal displacement in response to resin composite restorative procedures. Dent Mater (2007) [Epub ahead of print]
72. Casselli D.S., and Martins L.R. Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo. J Adhes Dent 8 1 (2006) 53-58
73. Perdigao J., Geraldeli S., and Hodges J.S. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 134 12 (2003) 1621-1629
74. Akpata E.S., and Behbehani J. Effect of bonding systems on post-operative sensitivity from posterior composites. Am J Dent 19 3 (2006) 151-154