Comparative assessment of imaging modalities in biliary obstruction

Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 577-582

  Upadhyaya, V ^a   Upadhyaya, D ^a   Ansari, M ^a   Shukla, V ^a  

^a BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Biliary obstruction; Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTION; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSHEPATIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 34250629687     PISSN: 09713026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.32273     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ferruci JT, Jr. Body Ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1979; 300:590-602.
2. Taylor KJW, Rosenfield AT, de Graaff CS. Anatomy and pathology of the biliary tree as demonstrated by ultrasound. Clinics in Diagnostic Ultrasound 1979; 1:103-21.
3. Majoie CB, Smits NJ, Phoa SS, Reeders JW, Jansen PL. Primary sclerosing cholangitis : sonographic findings. Abdom Imag 1995; 20: 109-12.
4. Malini S, Sabel J. Ultrasonography in obstructive jaundice. Radiology 1977; 123:429-33.
5. Baron R L, Stanley RJ, Lee JKT, Koehler RE, Melson GE, Balfe DM et al. A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography. Radiology 1982; 145: 91-8.
6. Khandelwal KC, Merchant NH, Udani RJ, Joshi MS, Parikh VP, G Pradipkumar et al. Role of ultrasonography in obstructive jaundice. Ind J Radiol Imag 1991; 1: 17-20.
7. Zagoni T, Benko Z, Telegdy L, Antony A, Keleti G, Peter Z. Diagnostic value of abdominal ultasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopamcreatography in obstructive jaundice. Orv Hetil 1995; 136 (28): 1483-6.
8. Kumar M, Prashad R, Kumar A, Sharma R, Acharya SK, Chattopadhyay TK. Relative merits of ultrasonography, computed tomography and cholangiography in patients of surgical obstructive jaundice. Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45(24): 2027-32.
9. Baron RL. Common bile duct stones: re-assessment of criteria for CT diagnosis. Radiology 1987; 162: 419-24.
10. Jeffrey RB Jr, Federle MP, Laing FC, Wall S, Rego J, Moss AA. Computed tomography of choledocholithiasis. AJR 1983; 140: 1179-83.
11. Pedrosa CS, Casanova R, Lezana AH, Fernandez MC. Computed tomography in obstructive jaundice. Part II: The cause of obstruction. Radiology 1981;139:635-45.
12. Pedrosa CS, Casanova R, Rodriguez R. Computed tomography in obstructive jaundice. Part I: The level of obstruction. Radiology 1981; 139:635-45.
13. Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology 1976; 70: 314-20.
14. Hamilton I, Lintott DJ, Rothwell J, Axon ATR. Acute pancreatitis following Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Clin Radiol 1983; 34: 543-6.
15. Thoeni RF, Fel SC, Goldberg HI.CT detection of asymptomatic pancreatitis following ERCP. Gastrointest Radiol 1990; 15: 291-5.
16. Lo SK, Chen J. The role of ERCP in choledocholithiasis. In MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SI, Chung JJ, Song SY, Kim KS et al. Radiology 2002; 224:410-16.
17. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. In MR cholangiopancreatography. Fulcher AS, Turner MA. Radiol Clin N Am 2002;40:1363-76.
18. Soto JA, Yucel EK, Barish MA, Chuttani R, Ferrucci JT. MR cholangio-pancreatography after unsuccessful or incomplete ERCP. Radiology 1996; 199:91-8.
19. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography : comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology 1996; 110:589-97.
20. Magnuson TH, Bender JS, Duncan MD, Ahrendt SA, Harmon JW, Regan F. Utility of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary obstruction. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189(1): 63-71.
21. Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 25-35.
22. Regan F, Smith D, Khazan R, Bohlman M, Schultze-Haakh H, Campion J, et al. MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20(4): 627-32.
23. Georgopoulos SK, Schwartz LH, Jarnagin WR, Gerdes H, Breite I, Fong Y,et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1002-7.
24. Adamek HE, Breer H, Karschkes T, Albert J, Riemann JF. Magnetic resonance imaging in gastroenterology: Time to say good-bye to all that endoscopy? Endoscopy 2000; 32(5): 406-10.