Comparison of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in malignant pancreaticobiliary obstruction

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 134, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 1002-1007

  Georgopoulos, Steve K ^a   Schwartz, Lawrence H ^a   Jarnagin, William R ^a   Gerdes, Hans ^a   Breite, Ira ^a   Fong, Yuman ^a   Blumgart, Leslie H ^a   Kurtz, Robert C ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DUODENOSCOPY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PANCREAS CARCINOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLESTASIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC DUCTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 0032869723     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.134.9.1002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bibao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM. Complications of endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10,000 cases. Gastroenterology, 1976; 70:314-320.
2. Sarr MG, Cameron JL. Surgical management of unresectable carcinoma of the pancreas. Surgery. 1982;91:123-133.
3. deRooij PD, Rogatko A, Brennan MF. Evaluation of palliative surgical procedures in unresectable pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg. 1991;78:1053-1058.
4. Conlon KC, Dougherty E, Klimstra DS, et al. The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy. Ann Surg. 1996;223:134-140.
5. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, et al. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted CE-fast sequence. Radiology. 1991;181:805-808.
6. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yugel EK. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:589-597.
7. Reinhold C, Bret PM. Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1285-1295.
8. Miyazuki T, Yamashita Y, Tsuchigime T, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography using HASTE (Half-Fourier Acquisition Single-Shot Turbo Spin-Echo) sequences. AJP Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1297-1303.
9. Regan F, Smith D, Khazan R, et al. MR cholangiography in biliary obstruction using half-Fourier acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:627-632.
10. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Siegenberg D, Ferrucci JT, Chuttani R. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterology. 1996;110:589-597.
11. Soto JA, Barish MA, Yugel EK, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: findings on 3D fast spin-echo imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;165:1397-1401.
12. Morimoto K, Shimoni M, Shirakawa T, et al. Biliary obstruction evaluation with three dimensional MR cholangiography. Radiology. 1992;183:578-580.
13. Conlon KC, Klimstra DS, Brennan MF. Long-term survival after curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: clinicopathologic analysis of 5-year survivors. Ann Surg. 1996;223:273-279.
14. Klempnauer J, Ridder GJ, von Wasielewski R, et al. Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:947-954.
15. Pitt HA, Gomes AS, Lois JF, et al. Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost? Ann Surg. 1985;201:545-553.
16. Karsten TM, Davids PHP, van Gulik TM, et al. Effects of biliary endoprostheses on the extrahepatic bile ducts in relation to subsequent operation of the biliary tract. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:343-352.
17. MacPherson GAD, Benjamin IS, Hodgson HJF, et al. Preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: the results of a controlled trial. Br J Surg. 1984; 74:371-375.
18. Heslin MJ, Brooks AD, Hochwald SN, et al. Preoperative biliary stenting is associated with increased complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 1998;133:149-155.