Speech and non-speech processing in hemispherectomised children: An event-related potential study

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 665-673

  Liasis, Alki ^a   Boyd, Stewart ^a   Rivera Gaxiola, Maritza ^b   Towell, Anthony ^a,c  

^a GREAT ORMOND STREET HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Auditory systems: central physiology; Cerebral lateralisation; Event related potential; Hemispherectomy; Sensory systems; Speech; Syllable

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN MALFORMATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERECTOMY; HUMAN; INTRACTABLE EPILEPSY; LATENT PERIOD; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RECORDING; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCALP; SPEECH; TEMPORAL LOBE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EPILEPSY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LANGUAGE; NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 1642356878     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(03)00190-3     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams C.B.T. Hemispherectomy - a modification. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 46:1983;617-619.
2. Basser L. Hemiplegia of early onset and the faculty of speech with special reference to the effects of hemispherectomy. Brain. 85:1962;427-460.
3. Boatman D., Freeman J., Vining E., Pulsifier M., Migliotretti D., Minhan R., Carson B., Brandt J., McKhann G. Language recovery after left hemispherectomy in children with late-onset seizures. Ann. Neurol. 46:1999;579-586.
4. Braddick O., Atkinson J., Hood B., Harkness W., Jackson G., Vargha-Khadem F. Possible blindsight in infants lacking one cerebral hemisphere. Nature. 360:1992;461-463.
5. Broca P.P. Remarques sur le siege de la faculté du language articule, suivies d'une observation d'aphemie. Bull. Soc. Anatomique. 36:1861;330-357.
6. Cheour L.M., Alho K., Kujala T., Sainio K., Reinikainen K., Renlund M., Aaltonen O., Eerola O., Näätänen R. Mismatch negativity indicates vowel discrimination in newborns. Hear. Res. 82:1995;53-58.
7. Cohen S.N., Syndulko K., Rever B., Kraut J., Coburn J., Tourtellotte W.W. Visual evoked potentials and long latency event-related potentials in chronic renal failure. Neurology. 33:1983;1219-1222.
8. Curtiss S., de Bode S., Mathern G.W. Spoken language outcomes after hemispherectomy: factoring in etiology. Brain Lang. 79:2001;379-396.
9. Dandy W.E. Removal of the right cerebral hemisphere for certain tumours with hemiplegia. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 90:1928;823.
10. DeCasper A., Fifer W. Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mother's voices. Science. 208:1980;1174-1176.
11. Dehaene-Lambertz G. Cerebral specialization for speech and non-speech stimuli in infants. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12:(3):2000;449-460.
12. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Baillet S. A phonological representation of the infant brain. Neuroreport. 9:1998b;1885-1888.
13. Dehaene-Lambertz G., Dehaene S. Speed and cerebral correlates of syllable discrimination in infants. Nature. 370:1994;292-295.
14. Dijkerman H.C., Jones S., Polkey C., Vargha-Khadem F., Weiskrantz L. Sensorymotor function after hemispherectomy. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 19:1993;616.
15. Goodman R. Hemispherectomy and its alternatives in the treatment of intractable epilepsy in patients with infantile hemiplegia. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 28:1986;251-258.
16. Le J., Lu M., Pellouchoud E., Gevins A. A rapid method for determining standard 10/10 electrode positions for high resolution EEG studies. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106:1998;554-558.
17. Liasis A., Towell A., Boyd S. Intracranial auditory detection and discrimination potentials as substrates of echoic memory in children. Cogn. Brain Res. 7:(4):1999;503-506.
18. Liasis A., Towell A., Boyd S. Intracranial evidence for differential encoding of frequency and duration discrimination responses. Ear. Hear. 21:(3):2000;252-256.
19. Liberman C., Mattingly I.G. A specialization for speech perception. Science. 243:1989;489-494.
20. Lovett M.W., Dennis M., Newman J.E. Making reference: the cohesive use of pronouns in the narrative discourse of hemidecorticate adolescents. Brain Lang. 29:1986;251.
21. Mehler J., Jusczyk P., Lambertz G., et al. A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition. 29:1988;143-178.
22. Mills D.L., Coffey-Corina S., Neville H.J. Language comprehension and cerebral specialisation from 13 to 20 months. Dev. Neuropsychol. 13:1997;397-445.
23. Molfese D.L., Molfese V.J. Cortical responses of preterm infants to phonetic and nonphonetic speech stimuli. Dev. Psychol. 16:1980;574-581.
24. Molfese D.L., Burger-Judisch L.M. Dynamic temporal-spatial allocation of resources in the human brain. An alternative to the static view of hemispheric differences. Kitterle F.L. Cerebral Laterality: Theory and Research. 1991;71-102 Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
25. Novak G.P., Kurtzberg D., Kreuzer J.A., Vaughan H.G. Cortical responses to speech sounds and their formants in normal infants: maturational sequence and spatiotemporal analysis. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 73:1989;295-305.
26. Ponton C.W., Eggermont J.J., Kwong B., Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity; evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111:2000;220.
27. Rivera-Gaxiola M., Johnson M.H., Csibra G., Karmiloff-Smith A. Electrophysiological correlates of category goodness. Behav. Brain Res. 112:(1-2):2000;1-11.
28. Rosenblatt B., Vernet O., Montes J.L., Andermann F., Schartz S., Taylor L.B., Vilemure J., Farmer J. Continuous unilateral epileptiform discharge and language delay: effect of functional hemispherectomy on language acquisition. Epilepsia. 39:1998;787-792.
29. Scherg M., Vajsar J., Picton T.W. A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1:1989;336-355.
30. Taylor L.B. Neuropsychological assessment of patients with encephalitis. Anderman F. Chronic Encephalitis and Epilepsy: Rasmussen Syndrome. 1991;111-124 Butterworth-Heinmann, Massachusetts.
31. Tinuper P., Andermann F., Villemure J.G., Rasmussen T., Quesney L.P. Functional hemispherectomy for treatment of epilepsy associated with hemiplegia: rational, indications, results, and comparison with callosotomy. Ann. Neurol. 24:1988;34.
32. Vargha-Khadem F. Congenital versus acquired insult of the cerebral hemispheres: neuropsychological perspectives. Besag F.M.C., Williams R.T. Educational and Child Psychology. vol. 10:1993;12-16 The British Psychological Society, Leicester.
33. Vargha-Khadem F., Carr L.J., Isaacs E., Brett E., Adams C., Mishkin M. Development of language in six hemispherectomised patients. Brain. 114:1991;473-495.
34. Villemure J.G., Rasmussen T. Functional hemispherectomy in children. Neuropediatrics. 24:1993;53-55.
35. Vining E., Freeman J., Pillas D.J., Uematsu S., Carson B.S., Brandt J., Boatman D., Pulsifer M.B., Zuckerberg A. Why would you remove half a brain? The outcome of 58 children after hemispherectomy - The John Hopkins Experience: 1968-1996. Pediatrics. 100:1997;163-171.
36. Witleson S.F., Pallie W. Left hemisphere specialisation for language in the new-born: neuroanatomical evidence of asymmetry. Brain. 88:1973;653-662.