Extraction of radio-labelled xanthine derivatives by artificial receptors: Deep insight into the association behaviour

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 3724-3732

  Bomkamp, Martin ^a   Siering, Carsten ^a   Landrock, Karin ^b   Stephan, Holger ^b   Fröhlich, Roland ^c   Waldvogel, Siegfried R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b INSTITUTE OF ION BEAM PHYSICS AND MATERIALS RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Caffeine; Extraction; Isotopic labelling; Receptors; Supramolecular chemistry

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION REACTIONS; BINDING ENERGY; DERIVATIVES; DICHLOROMETHANE; EXTRACTION; SUPRAMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY; TOLUENE;

BINDING CONSTANTS; CAFFEINE; ISOTOPIC LABELLING; RECEPTORS;

NITROGEN COMPOUNDS;

CAFFEINE; DICHLOROMETHANE; RADIOISOTOPE; RECEPTOR; SOLVENT; THEOPHYLLINE; TOLUENE; XANTHINE DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECT; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

BINDING SITES; BINDING, COMPETITIVE; CAFFEINE; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; METHYLENE CHLORIDE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; RADIOISOTOPES; RECEPTORS, PEPTIDE; SOLVENTS; THEOPHYLLINE; TOLUENE; XANTHINES;

EID: 34250379845     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200601231     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. J. M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim, 1995.
2. J. W. Steed, J. L. Atwood, Supramolecular Chemistry, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, 2000;
3. P. Cragg, A Practical Guide to Supramolecular Chemistry, Wiley, Chichester, 2005;
4. K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1987.
5. H. J. Schneider, A. Yatsimirsky, Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry, Wiley, Chichester, 2000.
6. U. Spichiger-Keller, Chemical Sensors and Biosensors for Medical and Biological Applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2000.
7. S. R. Waldvogel, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 624-625;
8. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 604-605;
9. G. A. Spiller, Caffeine, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, 1998.
10. B. H. Bech, E. A. Nohr, M. Vaeth, T. B. Henriksen, J. Olsen, Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005, 162, 983-990.
11. P. Ballester, M. A. Barcelo, A. Costa, P. M. Deya, J. Morey, M. Orell, C. A. Hunter, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 3849-3853;
12. S. Goswami, A. K. Mahapatra, R. Mukherjee, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2717-2726;
13. R. Fiammengo, M. Crego-Calama, P. Timmerman, D. N. Reinhoudt, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 784-792;
14. P. C. Anderson, S. Mecozzi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 5290-5291.
15. M. C. Schophol, C. Siering, O. Kataeva, S. R. Waldvogel, Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 2724-2727;
16. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2620-2623.
17. S. R. Waldvogel, R. Fröhlich, C. A. Schalley, Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 2580-2583;
18. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 2472-2475.
19. C. Siering, B. Beermann, S. R. Waldvogel, Supramol. Chem. 2006, 18, 23-27.
20. C. Siering, S. Grimme, S. R. Waldvogel, Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 1877-1888.
21. D. Mirk, H. Luftmann, S. R. Waldvogel, Z. Naturforsch. B: Chem. Sci. 60, 1077-1082.
22. K. Gloe, P. Mühl, Isotopenpraxis 1983, 19, 257-260;
23. H. Stephan, S. Juran, B. Antonioli, K. Gloe, Extraction Methods in Analytical Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry (Ed.: C. A. Schalley), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2007, pp. 79-103.
24. a) M. Petrich, L. Beyer, K. Gloe, P. Mühl, Anal. Chim. Acta 1990, 228, 229-234;
25. b) C. F. Baes, Jr., Solv. Extr. Ion Exch. 2001, 19, 193-213.
26. M. C. Schopohl, A. Faust, D. Mirk, R. Fröhlich, O. Kataeva, S. R. Waldvogel, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 14, 2987-2999;
27. S. R. Waldvogel, D. Mirk, Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4769-4772.
28. S. R. Waldvogel, A. R. Wartini, P. H. Rasmussen, J. Rebek, Jr., Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3515-3517.
29. W. Traube, Chem. Ber. 1900, 33, 3035-3056.
30. -4M in HEPES/NaOH buffer, pH 7.4) was extracted into the organic phase.
31. A solubility of the individual receptor in the organic solvent of at least 0.0025 M is required.
32. xanthine=0.0001 M in aqueous solution (pH 7.4).
33. [13a]
34. -1. Therefore, the complex formation is definitely enthalpy driven. However, the differences between the receptors will also have entropic contributions. These are a matter of detailed ongoing investigations and will be further discussed in due course.
35. For the water-free binding of caffeine, the spiro ketals have to bend towards the triphenylene by approximately 10-15°.
36. J. E. Ladbury, Chem. Biol. 1996, 3, 973-980;
37. J. Janin, Structure Struct. Fold. Des. 1999, 7, R277-R279;
38. F. A. Quiocho, Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1293-1306;
39. F. A. Quiocho, Nature 1989, 340, 404-408;
40. W. I. Weiss, K. Drickamer, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 441-473;
41. R. U. Lemieux, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1989, 18, 347-374;
42. H. Lis, N. Sharon, Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 637-674.
43. R. P. Bonar-Law, J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 259-271.
44. M. Mazik, H. Cavga, P. G. Jones, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9045-9052;
45. M. Mazik, W. Radunz, W. Sicking, Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4579-4582.
46. G. Otting, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1997, 33, 259-285.
47. F. W. Kotch, V. Sidorov, Y.-F. Lam, K. J. Kayser, H. Li, M. S. Raucher, J. T. Davis, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15 140-15 150.
48. J. C. Adrian, Jr., C. S. Wilcox, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1398-1403.
49. For comparison: 7d: 45.9% caffeine extraction; 1b-1h: > 98% caffeine extraction ([receptor] =0.001 M in toluene; 0.0001 M caffeine in HEPES/NaOH buffer, pH 7.4).
50. H. Gampp, M. Maeder, C. J. Meyer, A. D. Zuberbühler, Talanta 1985, 32, 1133-1139.