Analysis of intramolecular dynamic processes in enantiomeric diaryl atropisomers and related derivatives by2H NMR spectroscopy in polypeptide liquid crystals

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 13, Issue 13, 2007, Pages 3772-3786

  Lafon, Olivier ^a   Lesot, Philippe ^a   Fan, Chun An ^a   Kagan, Henri B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

Atropisomerism; Chirality; Conformational analysis; Exchange processes; Kinetic and activation parameters; Liquid crystals; NMR spectroscopy

Indexed keywords

DERIVATIVES; ISOMERS; LIQUID CRYSTALS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; POLYPEPTIDES;

ATROPISOMERISM; CONFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS; EXCHANGE PROCESSES; KINETIC AND ACTIVATION PARAMETERS;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

NAPHTHALENE DERIVATIVE; PEPTIDE; SOLVENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; ISOMERISM; LIQUID CRYSTAL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; STEREOISOMERISM;

ISOMERISM; LIQUID CRYSTALS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; NAPHTHALENES; PEPTIDES; SOLVENTS; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 34250335976     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: 15213765     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chem.200601284     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. P. Llyod-Williams, E. Cirait, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30, 145-157, and references therein.
2. M. Oki, Top. Stereochem. 1983, 14, 1-82, and references therein.
3. A. L. Eliel, A. H. Wilen, Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds, Wiley, New York, 1994.
4. H. S. Gutowsky, D. W. McCall, C. P. Slichter, J. Chem. Phys. 1953, 21, 279-292.
5. a) A. D. Bain, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2003, 39, 63-103, and references therein;
6. b) S. Grilli, L. Lunazzi, A. Mazzanti, M. Pinamonti, Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 4451-4458;
7. c) D. Casarini, C. Coluccini, L. Lunazzi, A. Mazzanti, J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5098-5102.
8. a) C. S. Johnson, J. Magn. Reson., Ser. A 1993, 102, 214-218;
9. b) E. J. Cabrita, S. Berger, P. Bräuer, J. Kärger, J. Magn. Reson. 2002, 157, 124-131;
10. c) P. Thureau, B. Ancian, S. Viel, A. Thévand, Chem. Commun. 2006, 200-202.
11. R. Poupko, Z. Luz in Encyclopedia of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (Eds.: G. M. Grant, R. K. Harris), Wiley. Chichester. 1996, pp. 1783-1797, and references therein.
12. Z. Luz in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Liquid Crystals (Ed.: J. W. Emslcy), NATO. Dordrecht, 1985, pp. 315-340.
13. R. Poupko, Z. Luz, J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 75, 1675-1681.
14. C. Boeffel, Z. Luz, R. Poupko, H. Zimmermann, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7158-7163.
15. a) S. Ternieden, D. Muller, K. Muller, Liquid Crystals 1999, 26, 759-769;
16. b) S. Ternieden, D. Zauser, K. Muller, Liquid Crystals 2000, 27, 1171-1182.
17. M. E. Moseley, R. Poupko, Z. Luz, J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 48, 354-360.
18. I. Canet, J. Courtieu, A. Loewenstein, A. Meddour, J.-M. Péchiné, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6520-6526.
19. M. Sarfati, P. Lesot, D. Merlet, J. Courtieu, Chem. Commun. 2000, 2069-2081.
20. P. Lesot, M. Sarfati, J. Courtieu, Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1724-1745.
21. a) C. Aroulanda, D. Merlet, J. Courtieu, P. Lesot, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12059-12066;
22. b) P. Lesot, D. Merlet, M. Sarfati, J. Courtieu, H. Zimmermann, Z. Luz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10071-10082.
23. C. Aroulanda, M. Sarfati, J. Courtieu, P. Lesot, Enantiomer 2001, 6, 281-287.
24. Note that the case of chiral, substituted cyclohexanes is very peculiar because the exchange rate between enantiomers can be determined without discriminating the enantiomeric forms. Indeed for these compounds, the interconversion between enantiomers also leads to the interconversion of diastereotopic directions (axial and equatorial bonds) that are nonequivalent in achiral LCs.
25. P. Lesot, O. Lafon, C.-A. Fan, H. B. Kagan, Chem. Commun. 2006, 389-391.
26. C. Zannoni in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Liquid Crystals (Ed.: J. W. Emsley), NATO. Dordrecht, 1985, pp. 1-31.
27. J. W. Emsley, J. C. Lindon, NMR Spectroscopy Using Liquid Crystal Solvents, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975.
28. a) B. Halle, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spearosc. 1996, 32, 137-159;
29. b) Z. Luz in NMR of Ordered Liquids (Eds.: E. E. Burnell, C. A. de Lange), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2002, pp. 419-448.
30. M. H. Levitt, Spin Dynamics, Wiley, 2005, Chichester. pp. 492-494.
31. E. Gelerinter, Z. Luz, R. Poupko, H. Zimmermann, J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92-93, 8845-8850.
32. a) J. A. Pople, W. O. Schneider, H. J. Bernstein, High Resolution NMR, McGraw-Hill, New York. 1959, pp. 218-230;
33. b) G. Binsch, Top. Stereochem. 1968, 3, 97-192.
34. H. Eyring, Chem. Rev. 1935, 35, 65-77.
35. This approach is called the "coalescence temperature method".
36. M. J. S. Dewar, K. M. Dieter, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 8075-8086.
37. HyperchemTM, Professional 6.1, Hypercube, Inc. 1115 NN 4th street, Gainsville, Florida, 32601 (USA).
38. a) R. F. Stewart, J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 431-438;
39. b) L. J. Sham, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 1965, 140, 1697-1705.
40. a) K. L. Servis, R. L. Domenick, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 2211-2214:
41. b) S. Berger, H. Künzer, Tetrahedron 1983, 39, 1327-1329;
42. c) G. S. Pawley, E. A. Yeats, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B 1969, 25, 2009-2013.
43. A. Meddour, I. Canet, A. Loewenstein, J.-M. Péchiné, J. Courtieu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 9652-9656.
44. P. Lesot, O. Lafon, J. Courtieu, P. Berdagud, Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 3741-3746.
45. L. S. Bartell, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 3567-3571.
46. C. Canlet, D. Merlet, P. Lesot, A. Meddour, A. Loewenstein, J. Courtieu, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2000, 11, 1911-1918.
47. a) P. Lesot, D. Merlet, A. Meddour, A. Loewenstein, J. Courtieu, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1995, 91, 1371-1375;
48. b) A. Meddour, P. Berdagué, A. Hedli, J. Courtieu, P. Lesot, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 4502-4508.
49. a) I. Haller, Prog. Solid State Chem. 1975, 10, 103-118;
50. b) H. Kneppe, V. Reiffenrath, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1982, 87, 59-62:
51. c) M. L. Magnuson, B. M. Fung, J.-P. Bayle, Liquid crystals 1995, 19, 823-832.
52. J. Israelachvili, Intermodular and Surface Forces, Academic Press, San Diego, 1991.
53. a) J. Jeener, B. H. Meier, P. Bachmann, R. R. Ernst, J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 71, 4546-4553;
54. b) C. Boeffel, Z. Luz, R. Poupko, A. J. Vega, Isr. J. Chem. 1989, 29, 283-296.
55. c. and then determine the intersection point of the two plots.
56. -1).
57. a) V. Schurig, W. Bürkle, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 7573-7580;
58. b) F. Gasparrini, D. Misiti, M. Pierini, C. Villani, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1997, 8, 2069-2073;
59. c) M. Jung, V. Schurig, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 529-534.
60. W. Bürkle, H. Karfunkel, V. Schurig, J. Chromatogr. A 1984, 288, 1-14.
61. a) J. W. Emsley, P. Lesot, D. Merlet, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 522-530;
62. b) J. W. Emsley, P. Lesot, J. Courtieu, D. Merlet, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 5331-5337.
63. K. Mislow, P. Bickart, Isr. J. Chem. 1977, 17, 1-6.
64. E. L. Eliel, Isr. J. Chem. 1977, 17, 7-11.
65. a) S. Fujita, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 3390-3397;
66. b) S. Fujita, Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 735-740.