Measuring component adaptation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2949, Issue , 2004, Pages 71-86

  Brogi, Antonio ^a   Canal, Carlos ^b   Pimentel, Ernesto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPONENT ADAPTATION; COMPONENT-BASED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; HETEROGENEOUS SOFTWARE;

SPECIFICATIONS;

EID: 34250307308     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24634-3_8     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. R. Allen and D. Garlan. A formal basis for architectural connection. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6(3):213-49, 1997.
2. A. Bracciali, A. Brogi, and C. Canal. A formal approach to component adaptation. Journal of Systems and Software, Special Issue on Automated Component-Based Software Engineering, (in press).
3. A preliminary version of this paper was published in COORDINATION 2003: Fifth International Conference on Coordination Models and Languages, LNCS 2315, pages 88-95. Springer, 2002.
4. A. Brogi, C. Canal, and E. Pimentel. Soft component adaptation. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), 85(3), 2003.
5. A. Brogi, C. Canal, and E. Pimentel. On the specification of software adaptation. In FOCLASA'03, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (ENTCS), 90 (in press), 2003.
6. A. W. Brown and K. C. Wallnau. The current state of CBSE. IEEE Software, 15(5):37-47, 1998.
7. G. H. Campbell. Adaptable components. In ICSE 1999, pages 685-686. IEEE Press, 1999.
8. C. Canal, E. Pimentel, and J. M. Troya. Compatibility and inheritance in software architectures. Science of Computer Programming, 41:105-138, 2001.
9. A. Cechich, M. Piattini, and A. Vallecillo (Eds). Component-Based Software Quality. LNCS 2693. Springer, 2003.
10. A. Di Pierro, C. Hankin, H. Wiklicky. Approximate Non-interference. In CSFW'02, IEEE Press, pages 3-17, 2002.
11. S. Ducasse and T. Richner. Executable connectors: Towards reusable design elements. In ESEC/FSE'97, LNCS 1301. Springer, 1997.
12. D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural mismatch: Why reuse is so hard. IEEE Software, 12(6):17-26, 1995.
13. D. Gelernter and N. Carriero. Coordination languages and their significance. Communications of the ACM. 35(2):97-107. 1992
14. P. Inverardi and M. Tivoli. Automatic synthesis of deadlock free connectors for COM/DCOM applications. In ESEC/FSE'2001. ACM Press, 2001.
15. B. Jonsson, K. G. Larsen, and W. Yi. Probabilistic extensions of process algebras. Handbook of Process Algebra. Elsevier, 2001.
16. R. Mili et al. Semantic distance between specifications. Theoretical Computer Science, 247:257-276, Elsevier 2000.
17. R. Milner, J. Parrow, D. Walker. A calculus of mobile processes. Journal of Information and Computation, 100:1-77. 1992
18. R. Passerone et al. Convertibility Verification and Converter Synthesis: two faces of the same coin. In Proc. of the Int. Conference on Computer-Aided Design. ACM Press, 2002.
19. A. Vallecillo, J. Hernández, and J. M. Troya. New issues in object interoperability. In Object-Oriented Technology, LNCS 1964, pages 256-269. Springer, 2000.
20. K. Wallnau, S. Hissam, and R. Seacord. Building Systems from Commercial Components. SEI Series in Soft. Engineering, 2001.
21. M. Wermelinger and J. L. Fiadeiro. Connectors for mobile programs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 24(5):331-341, 1998.
22. D. M. Yellin and R. E. Strom. Protocol specifications and components adaptors. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 19(2):292-333, 1997.