From the structure of text to the dynamic of teams: The changing nature of technical communication practice

Technical Communication

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 210-231

  Conklin, James ^a,b,c,d  

^a STC ^*  (Canada)

^b Technical Communication and Organization Development Consulting Firm with Offices   (Canada)

^c Technical Communication and Organization Development Consulting Firm with Offices   (Canada)

^d Dept of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250202165     PISSN: 00493155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Albers, M. J. 2005. The future of technical communication: Introduction to this special issue. Technical communication 52:267-272.
2. Aired, G. J., W. E. Oliu, and C. T. Brusaw. 1992. The professional writer: A guide for advanced technical writing. New York, NY: St. Martin's.
3. Amare, N. 2002. The culture(s) of the technical communicator. IEEE transactions on professional communication 45:128-132.
4. Arnand, V., M. Clark, and M. Zellmer-Bruhn. 2003. Team knowledge structures: Matching task to information environment. Journal of managerial issues 15 (1): 15-31.
5. Bernhardt, S. A., and G. A. McCulley. 2000. Knowledge management and pharmaceutical development teams: Using writing to guide science. Technical communication 47:22-34.
6. Chemers, M. M. 1997. An integrative theory of leadership. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
7. Clark, M. A., S. D.Amundson, and R. L. Cardy. 2002. Cross-functional team decision-making and learning outcomes: A qualitative illustration. Journal of business and management 8:217-236.
8. Creswell, J. W. 2002. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Denison, D., S. Hart., and J. Kahn. 1996. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: Developing and validating a diagnostic model. Academy of management journal 39:179-202.
10. Dimock, H. G. 1993. How to observe your group. North York, ON: Captus Press, Inc.
11. Frankforter, S. A., and S. L. Christensen. 2005. Finding competitive advantage in self-managed work teams. Business forum 27 (1): 20-24.
12. Giammona, B. 2004. The future of technical communication: How innovation, technology, information management, and other forces are shaping the future of the profession. Technical communication 51:349-366.
13. Giordano, C. 2003. Professional communicators on cross-functional/multi- functional software product development teams: Analyzing the merging and emerging roles of technical communicators. Unpublished master's thesis, Queens University of Charlotte.
14. Grabill, J., and W. M. Simmons. 1998. Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical communication quarterly 7:415-441.
15. Guinan, P., J. Cooprider, and S. Faraj. 1998. Enabling software development team performance during requirements definition: A behavioral versus technical approach. Information systems research 9:101-125.
16. Hovde, M. R. 2001. Research tactics for constructing perceptions of subject matter in organizational contexts: An ethnographic study of technical communicators. Technical communication quarterly 10:59-95.
17. Jablonski, J. 2005. Seeing technical communication from a career perspective: The implications of career theory for technical communication theory, practice, and curriculum design. Journal of business and technical communication 19:5-41.
18. Jassawalla, A. R., and H. C. Sashittal. 2001. The role of senior management and team leaders in building collaborative new product teams. Engineering management journal 13 (2): 33-39.
19. Jones, S. L. 2005. From writers to information coordinators: Technology and the changing face of collaboration. Journal of business and technical communication 19:449-467.
20. Kastman Breuch, L. M. 2001. The overruled dust mite: Preparing technical communication students to interact with clients. Technical communication quarterly 10:193-210.
21. Kent-Drury, R. M. 2000. Bridging boundaries, negotiating differences: The nature of leadership in cross-functional proposal-writing groups. Technical communication 47:90-98.
22. Kouzes, J. M., and B. Z. Posner. 2005. The leadership challenge. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
23. Lawler III, E. E. 2001. The era of human capital has finally arrived. In The future of leadership: Today's top leadership thinkers speak to tomorrow's leaders, ed. W. Bennis, G. M. Spreitzer, and T. G. Cummings (14-25). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24. Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Lipman-Blumen, J. 2001. Why do we tolerate bad leaders? In The future of leadership: Today's top leadership thinkers speak to tomorrow's leaders, ed. W. Bennis, G. M. Spreitzer, and T. G. Cummings (125-138). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26. Loehr, L. 1995. Composing in groups: The concept of authority in cross-functional project team work. IEEE transactions on professional communication 38:83-94.
27. Lovelace, K., D. L. Shapiro, and L. R. Weingart. 2001. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management journal 44:779-793.
28. Marchwinski, T., and K. Mandziuk. 2000. The technical communicator's role in initiating cross-functional teams. Technical communication 47:67-76.
29. McGee, L. 2000. Communication channels used by technical writers throughout the documentation process. Technical communication 47:35-50.
30. Mirel, B. 1998. "Applied constructivism" for user documentation: Alternatives to conventional task orientation. Journal of business and technical communication 12:7- 49.
31. Mohamed, M., M. Stankosky, and A. Murray. 2004. Applying knowledge management principles to enhance cross-functional team performance. Journal of knowledge management 8:127-142.
32. Moore, P., and M. Kreth. 2005. From wordsmith to communication strategist: Heresthetic and political maneuvering in technical communication. Technical communication 52:302-322.
33. Orr, J. E. 1996. Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34. Quinn, J. B. 1992. Intelligent enterprise: A knowledge and service based paradigm for industry. New York, NY: The Free Press.
35. Rainey, K. T., R. K. Turner, and D. Dayton. 2005. Do curricula correspond to managerial expectations? Core competencies for technical communicators. Technical communication 52:323-352.
36. Roberts, T. L., P. H. Cheney, and P. D. Sweeney. 2002. Project characteristics and group communication: An investigation. IEEE transactions on professional communication 45:84-98.
37. Robey, D., H. Min Khoo, and C. Powers. 2000. Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams. Technical communication 47:51-66.
38. Salvo, M. J. 2001. Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical communication quarterly 10:273-290.
39. Schneider, B. 2002. Clarity in context: Rethinking misunderstanding. Technical communication 49:210-218.
40. Smart, K., and C. Barnum. 2000. Communication in cross-functional teams: An introduction to this special issue. Technical communication 47:19-21.
41. Turns, J., T. Wagner, and K. Shuyler. 2005. Moving toward knowledge-building communities in informational Web site design. Technical communication 52:52-63.
42. Valle, S., and L. Avella. 2003. Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams. European journal of innovation management 6 (1): 32-47.
43. Waddell, C. 1995. Defining sustainable development: A case study in environmental communication. Technical communication quarterly 4:201-216.
44. Watson, W. E., and L K. Michaelsen. 1988. Group interaction behaviors that affect group performance on an intellective task. Group & organization studies 13:495-516.
45. Webber, S. S. 2002. Leadership and trust: Facilitating cross-functional team success. Journal of management development 2:201-214.
46. Wenger, D. 2004. The collaborative construction of a management report in a municipal community of practice: Text and context, genre and learning. Journal of business and technical communication 18:411-451.
47. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Wilson, G., and J. D. Ford. 2003. The big chill: Seven technical communicators talk ten years after their master's program. Technical communication 50:145-159.
49. Wojahn, P., J. Dyke, L. Riley, E. Hensel, and S. Brown. 2001. Blurring boundaries between technical communication and engineering: Challenges of a multi-disciplinary, client-based pedagogy. Technical communications quarterly 10:129-149.