Social facilitation and inhibition during maximum versus typical performance situations

Human Performance

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 223-239

  Klehe, Ute Christine ^a   Anderson, Neil ^a   Hoefnagels, Esther A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250196028     PISSN: 08959285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08959280701333040     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alden, L. (1986). Self-efficacy and causal attributions for social feedback. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 460-473.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS (Version 5). Chicago: SmallWaters Corporation.
3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147.
4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701-725.
6. Bond, C. F. (1982). Social facilitation: A self-presentational view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1042-1050.
7. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 1 (2nd ed., pp. 687-732). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
9. Cottrell, N. B. (1968). Performacne in the presence of other human beings: Mere presence audience and affiliation effects. In E. C Simmel, R. A. Hoppe, & G. A. Milton (Eds.), Social Facilitation and Imitative Behavior (pp. 245-250). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Cottrell, N. B. (1972), Social facilitation. In C. G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 185-236), New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11. DuBois, C. L. Z., Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1993). Further exploration of typical and maximum performance criteria. Definitional issues, prediction, and white-black differences, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 205-211.
12. Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of alternative training methods on self-efficacy and performance in computer software training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 884-891.
13. Harkins, S. G. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-18.
14. Harkins, S. G., & Szymanski, K. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation: New wine in old bottles. In C. Hendrik (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Group processes and intergroup relations (Vol. 9, pp. 167-188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Henchy, T., & Glass, D. C (1968). Evaluation apprehension and the social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 446-454.
16. Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks: Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 937-942.
17. Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2000). Five factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 751-765.
18. Karau, S. J. & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.
19. Klehe, U.-C., & Anderson, N. (2007). The moderating influence of personality and culture on motivation in typical versus maximal performance situations. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 250-262.
20. Klehe, U.-C., & Anderson, N. (in press). Working hard and smart during typical and maximum performance. A test of the underlying assumptions. Journal of Applied Psychology.
21. Klehe, U.-C., & Anderson, N. (2004). Typical and Maximum Performance Scale (TMPS): Assessing perceptions of typical and maximum performance situations. Paper presented at the 19th annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Chicago, IL.
22. Klehe, U.-C., & Anderson, N. (2005), The prediction of typical and maximum performance. In A. Evers, N. Anderson, & O. Smit-Voskuyl (Eds.), Handbook of personnel selection (pp. 331-353). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
23. Klehe, U.-C., & Latham, G. P. (2006). What would you do-really or ideally? Constructs underlying the behavior description interview and the situational interview predicting typical versus maximum performance. Human Performance, 19, 357-382.
24. Kirk A. K., & Brown, D. F. (2003). Latent constructs of proximal and distal motivation predicting performance under maximum test conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 40-49.
25. Krampen, G. (1988). Competence and control orientations as predictors of test anxiety in students: Longitudinal results. Anxiety Research, 1, 185-197.
26. Krueger, N., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25, 385-400.
27. Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
28. Leland, E. I. (1983). Self-efficacy and other variables as they relate to precompetitive anxiety among male interscholastic basketball players. Leland,-Edward-I: Stanford U.
29. Locke, E. A., Mento, A. J., & Katcher, B. L. (1978). The interaction of ability and motivation in performance: An exploration of the meaning of moderators. Personnel Psychology, 31, 269-280.
30. Maier, N. R. (1955). Psychology in industry. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
31. Murphy, K. R., Martin, C., & Garcia, M. (1982). Do behavioral observation scales measure observation? Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 562-567.
32. Moses, J. L., & Byham, W. C. (1977). Applying the assessment center method. New York: Pergamon Press.
33. Ploeg, H. M., Defares, P. B. van der, & Spielberger, C. D. (1979). Zelf-beoordelings vragenlijst. STAI-versie DY-1 (Self-evaluation questionnaire STAT-version DY-1.). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets en Zeitlinger.
34. Ployhart, R. E., Lim, B.C., & Chan, K. Y. (2001). Exploring relations between typical and maximum performance ratings and the five-factor model of personality. Personnel Psychology, 54, 809-843.
35. Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482-486.
36. Sanna, L. J. (1992). Self-efficacy theory. Implications for social facilitation and social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 774-786.
37. Sanna, L. J., & Shotland, R. L. (1990). Valence of anticipated evaluation and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 82-92.