Effects of direct and indirect exchange on trust of in-group members

Japanese Journal of Psychology

Volumn 77, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 519-527

  Kiyonari, Toko ^a   Foddy, Margaret ^b   Yamagishi, Toshio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Generalized exchange; Group based trust; Reciprocity; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; GAME; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; JAPAN; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRUST;

ADULT; AUSTRALIA; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; JAPAN; MALE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRUST;

EID: 34250190988     PISSN: 00215236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.519     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brewer, M. B., & Silver, M. (1978). Ingroup bias as a function of task characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 393-400.
2. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems, and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
3. Cho, K., & Choi, B. (1999). A cross-society study of trust and reciprocity: Korea, Japan and the U.S. A paper presented at the WOW II, Workshop for the Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, June, 16-19.
4. Doise, W., Csepeli, G., Dann, H. D., Gouge, G. C., Larsen, K., & Ostell, A. (1972). An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 202-204.
5. Foddy, M., Platow, M. J., & Yamagishi, T. (2006). Groupbased trust in strangers: Evaluations or expectations? Working Paper, Center For the Study of Cultural and Ecological Foundations of Mind, Hokkaido University.
6. Hayashi, N., Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). Reciprocity, trust, and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society, 11, 27-46.
7. Jin, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1997). Group heuristics in social dilemma. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 190-198.
8. Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (1996). Bilateral dependency and the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 77-85.
9. Kiyonari, T. (2002). Expectations of a generalized exchange system and ingroup favortism: An experimental study of bounded reciprocity. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 1-9.
10. Kiyonari, T., & Yamagishi, T. (1999). A comparative study of trust and trustworthiness using the game of enthronement. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 100-109.
11. Kiyonari, T., & Yamagishi, T. (2004). Ingroup cooperation and the social exchange heuristic. In R.Suleiman, D. V. Budescu, I. Fischer & D. Messick, (Eds.), Contemporary Psychological Research on Social Dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.269-286.
12. Kiyonari, T., Yamagishi, T., Cook, K., & Cheshire, C. (2006). Does trust beget trustworthiness? trust and trustworthiness in two games and two cultures: A research note. Social Psychology Quarterly, 69, 270-283.
13. Nowak, M., & Sigmund, K. (1998). The dynamics of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 194, 561-574.
14. Platow, M. J., McClintock, C. G., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1990). Predicting intergroup fairness and ingroup bias in the minimal group paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 221-239.
15. Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M.J. (1977). Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis and suggestions for future. Annual Review of Psychology, 28, 363-392.
16. Shinada, M., Yamagishi, T., & Ohmura, Y. (2004). False friends are worse than bitter enemy: "Altruistic" punishment of in-group members. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 379-393.
17. Snijders, C. (1996). Trust and commitments. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis Publishers.
18. Suzuki, N., Konno, Y., & Yamagishi, T. (in press). In-group bias in trusting behaviour: A choice of allocator experiment with minimal group. Japanese Journal of Psychology.
19. Watabe, M., Terai, S., Hayashi, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1996). Cooperation in the one-shot prisoner's dilemma based on expectations of reciprocity. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 183-196.
20. Yamagishi, T., Foddy, M, Makimura, Y., Matsuda, M., Kiyonari, T., & Platow, M. (2005). Comparisons of Australians and Japanese on group-based cooperation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 173-190.
21. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
22. Yamagishi, T, & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.
23. Yamagishi, T., & Sato. K. (1986). Motivational bases of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 67-73.
24. Yuki, M., Maddux, W. W., Brewer, M. B., & Takemura, K. (2005). Cross-cultural differences in relationship-and group-based trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 48-62.