The role of stereotactic 11G vacuum biopsy for clarification of BI-RADS™ IV findings in mammography;Wertigkeit der stereotaktischen 11 G-vakuumbiopsie zur abklärung von befunden der kategorie BI-RADS™ IV in der mammographie

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 175, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 489-494

  Diebold, T ^a   Jacobi, V ^a   Krapfl, E ^a   Minckwitz, G v ^a   Solbach, C ^a   Ballenberger, S ^a   Hochmuth, K ^a   Balzer, J O ^a   Fellbaum, M ^a   Kaufmann, M ^a   Vogl, T J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

DCIS underestimation; Mammotome; Microcalcifications; Soft tissue lesions; Stereotactic breast biopsy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER INVASION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

ARTIFACTS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALCINOSIS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; CARCINOMA, LOBULAR; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC MAGNIFICATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VACUUM;

EID: 0242669300     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38444     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schreer I, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Early detection of breast cancer. Gynäkologe 1994; 27 (1): 12-16
2. Kessler M, Schneider P, Sittek H, Reiser M. Screening lowers breast cancer mortality. Motivate your patients for Mammography. MMW Fortschr Med 2001; 19 (143): 28
3. Ren JJ, Peer PG. A study on effectiveness of screening mammograms. Int J Epidemiol 2000; 29 (5): 803-806
4. Hieken TJ, Harrison J, Herreros J, Valasco JM. Correlating sonography, mammography and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer. Am J Surg 2001; 182 (4): 351-354
5. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Brest Carcinoma: Effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR Imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology 1999; 213: 881-888
6. Schmitt KP, Boehm T, Fleck M, Kaiser WA. Cost-effectiveness of MRImaging in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173 (19): 898-901
7. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Bick U, Bradely WG. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 531-546
8. Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL. Potential role of magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities in ductal carcinoma in situ detection. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9 (2): 345-356
9. Kuhl CK. MRI of the breast. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 46-58
10. Orel GO, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211: 845-850
11. Lacquement MA, Mitchell D, Hollingsworth AB. Positive predictive value of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189 (1): 34-40
12. Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Schaumloffel U, Viehweg P, Hofer H, Buchmann J, Lampe D. Minimally invasive stereotactic vacuum core breast biopsy. Eur Radiol 1998; 8 (3): 377-385
13. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Smolny T, Schaumlöffel U, Heinig A, Buchmann J, Lampe D. New methods for minimal invasive assessment of uncertain mammography and MRI tomography findings. Zentralbl Chir 1998; 123 (5): 66-69
14. Vargas HI, Agbunag RV, Khaikhali I. State of the art of minimally invasive breast biopsy: principles and practice. Breast Cancer 2000; 7 (4): 370-379
15. Wong AY, Salisbury E, Bilous M. Recent developments in stereotactic breast biopsy methodologies: an update for the surgical pathologist. Adv Anat Pathol 2000; 7 (1): 26-35
16. Burbank F. Stereotactic breast biopsy: comparison of 14- and 11-gauge Mammotome probe performance and complication rates. Am Surg 1997; 63 (11): 988-995
17. Velanovich V, Lewis FR, Nathanson D, Strand VF, Talpos GB, Bhandarkar S, Elkus R, Szymanski W, Ferrara JJ. Comparison of mamographically guided breast biopsy techniques. Ann Surg 1999; 229 (5): 625
18. Jackman RJ, Burbank F, Parker SH, Evans WP, Lechner MC, Richardson TR, Smid AA, Borofsky HB, Lee CH, Goldstein HM, Schilling KJ, Wray AB, Brem RF, Helbich TH, Lehrer DE, Adler SJ. Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 2001; 218 (2): 497-502
19. Joshi M, Duva-Frissora A, Padmanabhan R, Greeley J, Ranjan A, Ferucci F, Kwon J, Khettry U. Atypical ductal hyperplasia in stereotactic breast biopsies: enhanced accuracy of diagnosis with the Mammotome. Breast J 2001; 7 (4): 207-213
20. Lee CH, Philpotts LE, Horvath LJ, Tocino I. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. Radiology 1999; 212 (1): 189-194
21. Obenauer S, Fischer U, Baum F, Dammert S, Fuzesi L, Grabbe E. Stereotactic vacuum core biopsy of clustered microcalcifications classified as BI-RADS 3. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173 (8): 696-701
22. Hung WK, Lam HS, Lau Y, Chan CM, Yip WC. Diagnostic accuracy of vacuum-assisted biopsy device for image-detected lesions. Anz J Surg 2001; 71: 457-460