In-group bias in trusting behavior: A choice of allocator experiment with minimal groups

Japanese Journal of Psychology

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 17-24

  Suzuki, Naoto ^a   Konno, Yusuke ^a   Yamagishi, Toshio ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Allocator choice game; Generalized reciprocity; In group bias; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REWARD; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TRUST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; PREJUDICE; REWARD; TRUST;

EID: 34250173853     PISSN: 00215236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.78.17     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Brewer, M. B., & Krammer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effect of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 593-604.
2. Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T.A., & Dawes, R. M. (2002). Swift neighbors and persistent strangers: A cross-cultural investigation of trust and reciprocation in social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 168-206.
3. Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust, making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. pp. 49-72.
4. Doise, W., Csepeli, G., Dann, H. D., Gouge, G. C., Larsen, K., & Ostell, A. (1972). An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 202-204.
5. Foddy, M., & Hogg, M. (1999). Impact of leaders on resource consumption in social dilemmas: The intergroup context. In M. Foddy, M. Smithson, S. Schneider & M. Hogg (Eds.), Resolving social dilemmas. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press. pp. 309-330.
6. Foddy, M., Platow, M. J., & Yamagishi, T. (2006). Group-based trust in strangers: Evaluations or expectation? 21st Century COE "Cultural and Ecological Fundations of die Mind" Working paper series No. 51. Hokkaido University.
7. Gaertner, L., & Insko, C. A. (2000). Intergroup discrimination in the minimal group paradigm: Categorization, reciprocation, or fear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 77-94.
8. Grieve, P. G., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926-940.
9. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222-1233.
10. Jin, N., & Yamagishi, T. (1997). Group heuristics in social dilemma. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 190-198.
11. Jin, N., Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (1996). Bilateral dependency and the minimal group paradigm. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 77-85.
12. Kiyonari, T. (2002). Expectations of a generalized exchange system and ingroup favortism: An experimental study of bounded reciprocity. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 73, 1-9.
13. Kiyonari, T., & Yamagishi, T. (2004). Ingroup cooperation and the social exchange heuristic. In R. Suleiman, D. V. Budescu, I. Fischer & D. Messick, (Eds.), Contemporary psychological research on social dilemmas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 269-286.
14. Snijders, C. (1996). Trust and commitments. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Thela Thesis Publishers.
15. Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization in intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-178.
16. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. pp. 33-47.
17. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup behavior. Chicago: Nelson Hall. pp. 7-24.
18. Wit, A. P., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). The effect of social categorization on cooperation in three types of social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 135-151.
19. Japanese source
20. Yamagishi, T. (1998). The structure of trust: The evolutionary games of mind and society. Tokyo University Press.
21. Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup favoritism and in-group boasting. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161-197.
22. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.
23. Yamagishi, T., Makimura, Y., Foddy, M., Matsuda, M., Kiyonari, T., & Platow, T. (2005). Comparisons of Australians and Japanese on group-based cooperation. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 173-190.
24. Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and Commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129-166.