Classical computation of decoherence dynamics in continuous variable systems

Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics

Volumn 40, Issue 9, 2007, Pages

  Han, Heekyung ^a   Brumer, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; CONTINUUM MECHANICS; QUANTUM THEORY;

CLASSICAL COMPUTATIONS; CONTINUOUS VARIABLE SYSTEMS; COUPLING POTENTIALS; DECOHERENCE DYNAMICS; SEMICLASSICAL DOMAIN;

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 34250157774     PISSN: 09534075     EISSN: 13616455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/40/9/S13     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Shapiro M and Brumer P 2003 Principles of the Quantum Control of Molecular Processes (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience)
2. Zurek W H 2003 Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 715
3. Joos E, Zeh H-D, Kiefer C, Guilini D, Jupsch J and Stamatescu I-O 2003 Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory 2nd edn (Berlin: Springer) and references therein
4. Nielsen M A and Chuang I L 2000 Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
5. Shor P W 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 2493
6. Steane A M 1996 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 793
7. Knill E and Laflamme R 1997 Phys. Rev. A 55 900
8. Duan L-M and Guo G-C 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 1953
9. Zanardi P and Rasetti M 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 3306
10. Lidar D A, Chuang I L and Whaley K B 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 2594
11. Wiseman H M and Milburn G J 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 548
12. Shapiro M and Brumer P 1989 J. Chem. Phys. 90 6179
13. Carvalho A P R, Millman P, de Mattos Filho R L and Davidovich L 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 4988
14. Poyatos J F, Cirac J I and Zoller P 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 4728
15. Myatt C J, King B E, Turchette Q A, Sackett C A, Kielpinski D, Itano W M, Monroe C and Wineland D J 2000 Nature 403 269
16. Shapiro M and Brumer P 2002 Phys. Rev. A 66 052308
17. Wilkie J and Brumer P 1997 Phys. Rev. A 55 27
18. Wilkie J and Brumer P 1997 Phys. Rev. A 55 43
19. Brumer P and Gong J 2006 Phys. Rev. A 73 052109
20. Gong J and Brumer P 2003 Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 050402
21. Lichtner P C and Griffin J J 1976 Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 1521
22. Zurek W H, Habib S and Paz J P 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1187
23. Nemes M C and deToledo Piza A F R 1986 Physica A 137 367
24. Jiang X-P and Brumer P 1993 Chem. Phys. Lett. 208 179
25. Gong J and Brumer P 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 022101
26. Moyal J E 1949 Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 45 99
27. Han H and Brumer P (in preparation)
28. See, e.g. Eckhardt B, Hose G and Pollak E 1989 Phys. Rev. A 39 3776
29. Feit M D, Fleck J A and Steiger A 1982 J. Comput. Phys. 47 412
30. Zurek W H and Paz J P 1994 Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 2508
31. Paz J P, Habib S and Zurek W H 1993 Phys. Rev. D 47 488
32. Zurek W H 1982 Phys. Rev. D 26 1862
33. Zurek W H and Paz J P 1995 Physica D 83 300
34. Zurek W H, Habib S and Paz J P 1993 Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 1187
35. Angelo R M, Furuya K, Nemes M C and Pellegrino G O 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 043801
36. Pattanayak A K and Brumer P 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 4131
37. Tameshtit A and Sipe J E 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 1967
38. Lakshminarayan A 2001 Phys. Rev. E 64 036207
39. For related work at lower energies using an alternate approach see Angelo R M and Furuya K 2005 Phys. Rev. A 71 042321
40. Han H and Brumer P 2005 J. Chem. Phys. 122 144316
41. Elran Y, Kapral R and Brumer P (in preparation)