«Category-split» effects in judgments about sportswomen, sportsmen, and sports;«Category-Split» Effekte bei Urteilen über Sportlerinnen, Sportler und Sportarten

Zeitschrift fur Sozialpsychologie

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 111-121

  Unkelbach, Christian ^a   Plessner, Henning ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Judgment biases; Metacognition; Sampling biases; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250006283     PISSN: 00443514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/0044-3514.38.2.111     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, N. H. (1967). Averaging model analysis of set-size effect in impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 158-165.
2. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44, 211-233.
3. Eddy, D.M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 249-267). Cambridge, NY: University Press.
4. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659-676.
5. Fiedler, K. & Armbruster, T. (1994). Two halfs may be more than one whole: Category-split effects on frequency illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 633-645.
6. Fiedler, K. & Juslin, P. (Eds.). (2006). Information sampling and adaptive cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Fiedler, K., Brinkmann, B., Betsch, T. & Wild, B. (2000). A sampling approach to biases in conditional probability judgments: Beyond base rate neglect and statistical format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 399-418.
8. Fiedler, K. & Plessner, H. (2004). Die Stichprobenfalle: Läßt sich eine Sensibilität für metakognitive Probleme beim stochastischen Denken vermitteln? Unterrichtswissenschaft, 32, 23-37.
9. Fiedler, K. & Plessner, H. (2006). Induktives Schließen: Umgang mit Wahrscheinlichkeiten. In J. Funke (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie Band C/II/8: Denken und Problemlösen (S. 265-328). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
10. Fiedler, K. & Wanke, M. (2004). On the vicissitudes of cultural and evolutionary approaches to social cognition: The case of meta-cognitive myopia. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 23-42.
11. Fiedler, K., Walther, E., Freytag, P. & Plessner, H. (2002). Judgment biases in a simulated classroom - A cognitive-environmental approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 527-561.
12. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
13. Nelson, T.O. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-116.
14. Plessner, H., Hartmann, K., Hohmann, N. & Zimmermann, I. (2001). Achtung Stichprobe! DerEinfluss der Informationsge-winnung auf die Bewertung sportlicher Leistungen. Psychologie und Sport, 8, 91-100.
15. Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H. & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
16. Tversky, A. & Koehler, D. J. (1994) Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547-567.
17. Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K. & Freytag, P. (in press). Information repetition in evaluative judgements: Easy to monitor, hard to control. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
18. Wanke, M., Bless, H. & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105-1113.
19. Wänke, M., Schwarz, N. & Bless, H. (1995). The availability heuristic revisited: Experienced ease of retrieval in mundane frequency estimates. Acta Psychologica, 89, 83-90.
20. Whittlesea, B.W. A. & Williams, L.D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165.
21. Whittlesea, B. W. A. & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 547-565.