Tax competition reconsidered

Journal of Public Economic Theory

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 391-423

  Dhillon, Amrita ^a   Wooders, Myrna ^b   Zissimos, Ben ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250002590     PISSN: 10973923     EISSN: 14679779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00312.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ASKENAZY, P., and C. LE VAN (1999) A model of optimal growth strategy, Journal of Economic Theory 85, 24 51.
2. BALDWIN, R., and P. KRUGMAN (2004) Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization, European Economic Review 48, 1 23.
3. BARRO, R. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth, Journal of Political Economy 98, S103 S125.
4. BARRO, R., and X. SALA-I-MARTIN (1995) Economic Growth. New York : McGraw Hill, Inc.
5. BAYINDIR-UPMANN, T. (1998) Two games of interjurisdictional tax competition when local governments provide industrial public goods, International Tax and Public Finance 5, 471 487.
6. BAYINDIR-UPMANN, T., and A. ZIAD (2005) Existence of equilibria in a basic tax-competition model, Regional Science and Urban Economics 87, 1 22.
7. BESLEY, T., and A. CASE (1995) Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition, American Economic Review 85, 25 45.
8. BLACK, D., and W. H. HOYT (1989) Bidding for firms, American Economic Review 79, 1249 1256.
9. BUCOVETSKY, S. (1991) Asymmetric tax competition, Journal of Urban Economics 30, 167 181.
10. BUCOVETSKY, S., and M. SMART (2006) The efficiency consequences of local revenue equalization: Tax competition and tax distortions, Journal of Public Economic Theory 8, 119 144.
11. DEVEREUX, M. P., R. GRIFFITH, and A. KLEMM (2001) Have taxes on mobile capital declined Institute for Fiscal Studies and University of Warwick Unpublished Manuscript.
12. DEVEREUX, M. P., R. GRIFFITH, and A. KLEMM (2003) Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition, Economic Policy 35, 451 495.
13. DHILLON, A., and C. PERRONI (2001) Tax earmarking and grass-roots accountability, Economics Letters 72, 99 106.
14. DHILLON, A., M. WOODERS, and B. ZISSIMOS (2005) Tax competition reconsidered, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Paper 06-W02.
15. FRISCH, R. (1965) Theory of Production. Dordrecht, Holland : D. Reidel Publishing Co. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co.
16. GERKING, S. D., and J. H. MUTTI (1981) Possibilities for the exportation of production taxes, Journal of Public Economics 16, 233 252.
17. HIGGOTT, R. (1999) Economics, politics and (international) political economy: The need for a balanced diet in an era of globalization, New Political Economy 4, 23 36.
18. LAUSSEL, D., and M. LE BRETON (1998) Existence of Nash equilibria in fiscal competition models, Regional Science and Urban Economics 28, 283 296.
19. LOCKWOOD, B. (1993) Commodity tax competition under destination and origin principles, Journal of Public Economics 52, 141 162.
20. LOCKWOOD, B. (2001) Tax competition and tax co-ordination under destination and origin principles: A synthesis, Journal of Public Economics 81, 279 319.
21. MAS-COLELL, A., M. D. WHINSTON, and J. R. GREEN (1995) Microeconomic Theory. New York, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
22. MINTZ, J., and M. SMART (2001) Income shifting, investment and tax competition: Theory and evidence from provincial taxation in Canada, CESifo Working Paper 554, 17 pages.
23. MINTZ, J., and H. TULKENS (1986) Commodity tax competition between member states of a federation: Equilibrium and efficiency. Journal of Public Economics 29, 133 172.
24. MINTZ, J., and H. TULKENS (1996) Optimality properties of alternative systems of taxation of foreign capital income, Journal of Public Economics 60, 373 399.
25. NOISET, L. (1995) Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the under-provision of local public goods: Comment, Journal of Urban Economics 38, 312 316.
26. OATES, W. E. (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
27. OATES, W. E., and R. M. SCHWAB (1988) Economic competition among jurisdictions: Efficiency enhancing or distortion inducing Journal of Public Economics 35, 333 354.
28. ROGOFF, K. (1990) Equilibrium political budget cycles, American Economic Review 80, 21 36.
29. ROMER, P. (1990a) Are nonconvexities important for understanding growth American Economic Review 80, 97 103.
30. ROMER, P. (1990b) Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy 98, S71 S102.
31. ROTHSTEIN, P. (2003) Fiscal cooperation and the permission to tax, Washington University typescript.
32. ROTHSTEIN, P. (forthcoming) Discontinuous payoffs, shared resources, and games of fiscal competition: Existence of pure strategy Nash equilibrium, Journal of Public Economic Theory.
33. WILDASIN, D. E. (1988) Nash equilibria in models of fiscal competition, Journal of Public Economics 35, 229 240.
34. WILDASIN, D. E. (1989) Interjurisdictional capital mobility: Fiscal externality and a corrective subsidy, Journal of Urban Economics 25, 193 212.
35. WILSON, J. D. (1986) A theory of interregional tax competition, Journal of Urban Economics 19, 296 315.
36. WILSON, J. D. (1991) Tax competition with interregional differences in factor endowments, Regional Science and Urban Economics 21, 423 451.
37. WILSON, J. D. (1999) Theories of tax competition, National Tax Journal 52, 269 305.
38. WILSON, J. E., and D. E. WILDASIN (2004) Tax competition: Bane or boon Journal of Public Economics 88, 1065 1091.
39. WOODERS, M. H. (1989) A Tiebout theorem, Mathematical Social Sciences 18, 33 55.
40. ZISSIMOS, B., and M. WOODERS (2005) Relaxing tax competition through public good differentiation, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Paper no. 06-W01.
41. ZODROW, G. R., and P. MIESZKOWSKI (1986) Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and the under-provision of local public goods, Journal of Urban Economics 19, 356 370.