Communicating research to peers, communicating editorial policies to authors

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 60, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 752-753

  Antunes, José Leopoldo Ferreira ^a   Martin, José Luis R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b Castile La Mancha Health Research Foundation (FISCAM)   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTHOR; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LETTER; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PEER GROUP; PERIODICALS; RESEARCH;

EID: 34249980082     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.012     Document Type: Letter

References (6)

1. Gordon A.J. Guidelines for contributors to social science and medicine. Soc Sci Med 50 (2000) 3-15
2. Mulligan A. Is peer review in crisis?. Oral Oncol 41 (2005) 135-141
3. Grivell L. Through a glass darkly: the present and the future of editorial peer review. EMBO Rep 7 (2006) 567-570
4. Mayo N.E., Brophy J., Goldberg M.S., Klein M.B., Miller S., Platt R.W., et al. Peering at peer review revealed high degree of chance associated with funding of grant applications. J Clin Epidemiol 59 (2006) 842-848
5. Jefferson T., Alderson P., Wager E., and Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 287 (2002) 2784-2786
6. Jefferson T., Wager E., and Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA 287 (2002) 2786-2790