Perceptions of issues associated with the maintenance and improvement of long-term health in people with SCI

Spinal Cord

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 411-419

  Manns, P J ^a   May, L A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health promotion; Long term health; Physical disability; Secondary conditions

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANADA; CAREGIVER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; COMMUNITY CARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FAMILY; FEMALE; FRIEND; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ADULT; CANADA; CAREGIVERS; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; COMMUNITY-INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; TIME; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34249945446     PISSN: 13624393     EISSN: 14765624     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101973     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Nosek MA et al. Secondary conditions in a community-based sample of women with physical disabilities over a 1-year period. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 320-327.
2. Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in veterans with paraplegia or quadriplegia: a model of premature aging. Metabolism 1994; 43: 749-756.
3. Dryden DM et al. Utilization of health services following spinal cord injury: a 6-year follow-up study. Spinal Cord 2004; 42: 513-525.
4. Potter P, Wolfe D, Burkell J, Hayes K. Challenges in educating individuals with SCI to reduce secondary conditions. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2004; 10: 30-40.
5. Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 1411-1422.
6. Kendall MB, Ungerer G, Dorsett P. Bridging the gap: transitional rehabilitation services for people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1008-1015.
7. Rimmer JH. Health promotion for people with disabilities: the emerging paradigm shift from disability prevention to prevention of secondary conditions. Phys Ther 1999; 79: 495-502.
8. Stuifbergen AK, Rogers S. Health promotion: an essential component of rehabilitation for persons with chronic disabling conditions. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1997; 19: 1-20.
9. Stuifbergen AK, Seraphine A, Harrison T, Adachi E. An explanatory model of health promotion and quality of life for persons with post-polio syndrome. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 383-393.
10. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot 1997; 12: 38-48.
11. Nieuwenhuijsen ER, Zemper E, Miner KR, Epstein M. Health behavior change models and theories: contributions to rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 245-256.
12. Garner C, Page SJ. Applying the transtheoretical model to the exercise behaviors of stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005; 12: 69-75.
13. Cardinal BJ, Kosma M, McCubbin JA. Factors influencing the exercise behavior of adults with physical disabilities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 868-875.
14. Martin PC, Fell DW. Beyond treatment: patient education for health promotion and disease prevention. J Phys Ther Educ 1999; 13: 49-56.
15. Hollis V, Openshaw S, Goble R. Conducting focus groups: purpose and practicalities. Br J Occup Ther 2002; 65: 2-8.
16. Krueger R, Casey M. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research 3rd ed. Sage Publications:Thousand Oaks, California 2000.
17. Carpenter C. Using qualitative focus groups to evaluate health programmes and service delivery. In: Hammell KW (ed) Qualitative Research in Evidence Based Rehabilitation. Churchill Livingstone: Toronto 2004.
18. Duggleby W. What about focus group interaction data? Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 832-840.
19. May L, Day R, Warren S. Evaluation of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: knowledge, problem solving and perceived importance. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 405-413.
20. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15: 1277-1288.
21. Strauss A, Corbin J. Publisher: Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks 1998.
22. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization: Geneva 2001.
23. Strecher V, Wang C, Derry H, Wildenhaus K, Johnson C. Tailored interventions for multiple risk behaviors. Health Educ Res 2002; 17: 619-626.
24. Wolfe DL, Potter PJ, Sequeira KAJ. Overcoming challenges: the role of rehabilitation in educating individuals with SCI to reduce secondary conditions. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2004; 10: 41-50.
25. May L, Day R, Warren S. Perceptions of patient education in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28: 1041-1049.
26. Tang PC, Newcomb C. Informing patients: a guide for providing patient health information. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5: 563-570.
27. Tingstrom P, Kamwendo K, Goransson A, Bergdahl B. Validation and feasibility of problem-based learning in rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Patient Educ Couns 2002; 47: 337-345.
28. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Hobbs M. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease. Eff Clin Pract 2001; 4: 256-262.
29. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, Grumbach K. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002; 288: 2469-2475.
30. Cardinal BJ, Kosma M. Self-efficacy and the stages and processes of change associated with adopting and maintaining muscular fitness-promoting behaviors. Res Q Exerc Sport 2004; 75: 186-196.
31. Stuifbergen AK, Becker HA. Predictors of health-promoting lifestyles in persons with disabilities. Res Nurs Health 1994; 17: 3-13.
32. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Plant K. A disease-specific self-help program compared with a generalized chronic disease selfhelp program for arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 950-957.
33. Lorig KR et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care 1999; 37: 5-14.
34. Hart KA, Rintala DH, Fuhrer MJ. Educational interests of individuals with spinal cord injury living in the community: medical, sexuality, and wellness topics. Rehabil Nurs 1996; 21: 82-90.
35. White MJ, Holloway M. Patient concerns after discharge from rehabilitation. Rehabil Nurs 1990; 15: 316-318.
36. Richards JS et al. Access to the environment and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 1501-1506.
37. Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, Angenot EL, van Asbeck FW, van der Woude LH. Duration and functional outcome of spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42(Suppl 1): 75-85.
38. Greenwald BD, Seel RT, Cifu DX, Shah AN. Gender-related differences in acute rehabilitation lengths of stay, charges, and functional outcomes for a matched sample with spinal cord injury: a multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 1181-1187.
39. The Enhancing Interdisiplinary Collaboration in Primary Health Care (EICP) Initiative. The Principles and Framework for Interdisiplinary Collaboration in Primary Health Care. The Conference Board of Canada: Ottawa, ON 2005.