Quantitative evaluation of the relaxivity effects of iodine on Gd-DTPA enhanced MR arthrography

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1219-1225

  Ganguly, Arundhuti ^a   Gold, Garry E ^b   Pauly, Kim Butts ^a   Mayer, Dirk ^a   Moseley, Michael M ^a   Pelc, Norbert J ^a,c   Fahrig, Rebecca ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Contrast agent; Gadolinium; Iodine; MR arthrography; Relaxivity

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE; MEGLUMINE DIATRIZOATE; SODIUM IODIDE;

ARTHROGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ARTHROGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYNOVIAL FLUID; VISCOSITY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; VISCOSITY;

EID: 34249915504     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20934     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sciulli RL, Boutin RD, Brown RR, et al. Evaluation of the postoperative meniscus of the knee: a study comparing conventional arthrography, conventional MR imaging. MR arthrography with iodinated contrast material, and MR arthrography with gadolinium-based contrast material. Skeletal Radiol 1999;28:508-514.
2. Montgomery DD, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Weishaupt D, Dougherty L. Effects of iodinated contrast and field strength on gadolinium enhancement: implications for direct MR arthrography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;15:334-343.
3. Choi JY, Kang HS, Hong SH, Jun WS, Moon SG, Choi JA. Optimization of the mixture ratio of iodinated contrast and gadolinium for simultaneous direct MR and CT arthrography. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of RSNA, Chicago, IL, USA, 2005. p. 221.
4. Engel A. Magnetic resonance knee arthrography. Enhanced contrast by gadolinium complex in the rabbit and in humans. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1990;240:1-57.
5. Helgason JW, Chandnani VP, Yu JS. MR arthrography: a review of current technique and applications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:1473-1480.
6. Rafii M, Minkoff J. Advanced arthrography of the shoulder with CT and MR imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:609-633.
7. Chandnani VP, Gagliardi JA, Murnane TG, et al. Glenohumeral ligaments and shoulder capsular mechanism: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1995;196:27-32.
8. Hodler J, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff disease: assessment with MR arthrography versus standard MR imaging in 36 patients with arthroscopic confirmation. Radiology 1992;182:431-436.
9. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology 1994; 190:645-651.
10. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging: physical principles and sequence design. New York: Wiley-Liss: 1999.
11. Bloembergen N, Purcell EM., Pound RV. Relaxation effects in nuclear magnetic resonance absorption. Phys Rev 1948;73:679-712.
12. Bloembergen N. Proton relaxation times in paramagnetic solutions. J Chem Phys 1957;27:572-573.
13. Solomon I. Relaxation processes in a system of two spins. Phys Rev 1955;99:559-565.
14. Freed J. Dynamic effects of par correlation functions on spin relaxation by translational diffusion in liquids. II. Finite jumps and independent T1 processes. J Chem Phys 1978;68:4035-4037.
15. Brown RR, Clarke DW, Daffner RH. Is a mixture of gadolinium and iodinated contrast material safe during MR arthrography? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1087-1090.
16. Hergan K, Doringer W, Langle M, Oser W. Effects of iodinated contrast agents in MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 1995;21:11-17.
17. Stanisz GJ, Henkelman RM. Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:665-667.
18. Vander Elst L, Laurent S, Muller RN. Multinuclear magnetic resonance characterization of paramagnetic contrast agents. The manifold effects of concentration and counterions. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:828-834.
19. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:343-351.
20. Waldt S, Metz S, Burkart A, et al. Variants of the superior labrum and labro-bicipital complex: a comparative study of shoulder specimens using MR arthrography, multi-slice CT arthrography and anatomical dissection. Eur Radiol 2006;16:451-458.
21. Reichenbach JR, Hacklander T, Harth T, Hofer M, Rassek M. Modder U. 1H T1 and T2 measurements of the MR imaging contrast agents Gd-DTPA and Gd-DTPA BMA at 1.5T. Eur Radiol 1997;7: 264-274.
22. Moss SG, Schweitzer ME, Jacobson JA, et al. Hip joint fluid: detection and distribution at MR imaging and US with cadaveric correlation. Radiology 1998;208:43-48.
23. Harris ED, Budd RC, Genovese M, Kelley WN, editors. Kelley's textbook of rheumatology. Philadelphia. PA: Elsevier Saunders: 2005.
24. Schweitzer ME, Falk A, Berthoty D, Mitchell M, Resnick D. Knee effusion: normal distribution of fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:361-363.
25. Schweitzer ME, Magbalon MJ, Fenlin JM, Frieman BG, Ehrlich S, Epstein RE. Effusion criteria and clinical importance of glenohumeral joint fluid: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1995;194:821-824.