Misregistration artifacts in image-derived arterial input function in non-echo-planar imaging-based dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1248-1255

  Kuribayashi, Hideto ^a,b   Worthington, Philip L ^a   Bradley, Daniel P ^a   Checkley, David R ^a   Tessier, Jean J ^a   Waterton, John C ^a  

^a ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^b Varian Technologies Japan Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Arterial input function; Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging; Misregistration artifact; Phase shift; Semikeyhole; Sliding window reconstruction

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ABDOMINAL AORTA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT;

ABDOMEN; ANIMALS; AORTA, ABDOMINAL; ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RATS;

EID: 34249908085     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20924     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Evelhoch J, Garwood M, Vigneron D, et al. Expanding the use of magnetic resonance in the assessment of tumor response to therapy: workshop report. Cancer Res 2005;65:7041-7044.
2. Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL, et al. The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations. Br J Cancer 2005;92:1599-1610.
3. Jones RA, Haraldseth O, Müller TB, Rinck PA, Øksendal AN. K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:830-834.
4. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671-675.
5. Spraggins TA. Simulation of spatial and contrast distortions in keyhole imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:320-322.
6. Parrish T, Hu X. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;33: 326-336.
7. Gao J-H, Xiong J, Lai S, et al. Improving the temporal resolution of functional MR imaging using keyhole lechniques. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:854-860.
8. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36: 345-351.
9. Rijpkema M, Kaanders JHAM, Joosten FBM, van der Kogel AJ, Heerschap A. Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:457-463.
10. d'Arcy JA, Collins DJ, Rowland U, Padhani AR, Leach MO. Applications of sliding window reconstruction with Cartesian sampling for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI. NMR Biomed 2002;15:174-183.
11. Kuribayashi H, Bradley DP, Checkley DR, Worthington PL, Tessier JJ. Averaging keyhole pulse sequence with presaturation pulses and EXORCYCLE phase cycling for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med Sci 2004;3:207-210.
12. Hou L, Yang Y, Mattay VS, Frank JA, Duyn JH. Optimization of fast acquisition methods for whole-brain relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) mapping with susceptibility contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:233-239.
13. Rausch M, Scheffler K, Rudin M, Rad EW. Analysis of input functions from different arterial branches with gamma variate functions and cluster analysis for quantitative blood volume measurements. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:1235-1243.
14. Bammer R, Moseley ME. Interleaved dual-echo spiral-out-spiral-in DSC imaging with generalized SENSE. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004 (Abstract 362).
15. Riederer SJ, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee JN, Wright RC, Herfkens RJ. MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med 1988; 8:1-15.
16. Constable RT, Gore JC. The loss of small objects in variable TE imaging: Implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:9-24.
17. Parker GJM, Tanner SF, Leach MO. Pitfalls in the measurement of tissue permeability over short time-scales using a low temporal resolution blood input function. In: Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, New York, NY, USA, 1996 (Abstract 1582).
18. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee T-Y. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;16:1057-1073.
19. Conturo TE, Barker PB, Mathews VP, Monsein LH, Bryan RN. MR imaging of cerebral perfusion by phase-angle reconstruction of bolus paramagnetic-induced frequency shifts. Magn Reson Med 1992;27:375-390.
20. Chu SC, Xu Y, Balschi JA, Springer CS Jr. Bulk magnetic susceptibility shifts in NMR studies of compartmentalized samples: use of paramagnetic reagents. Magn Reson Med 1990;13:239-262.
21. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging. Physical principles and sequence design. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999. 547 p.
22. Weisskoff RM, Kiihne S. MRI susceptometry: image-based measurement of absolute susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood. Magn Reson Med 1992;24:375-383.
23. Hu X, Parrish T. Reduction of field of view for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:691-694.
24. Parrish TB, Hu X. Hybrid technique for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:51-55.
25. Checkley D, Tessier JJL, Wedge SR, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of vascular changes induced by the VEGF-signalling inhibitor ZD4190 in human tumour xenografts. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:475-482.
26. Krishnan S, Chenevert TL. Spatio-temporal bandwidth-based acquisition for dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson lmgaing 2004;20:129-137.
27. Pickup S, Zhou R, Glickson J. MRI estimation of the arterial input function in mice. Acad Radiol 2003;10:963-968.
28. McIntyre DJO, Ludwig C, Pasan A, Griffiths JR. A method for interleaved acquisition of a vascular input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in experimental rat tumours. NMR Biomed 2004;17:132-143.
29. Workie DW, Dardzinski BJ. Quantifying dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:560-568.
30. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:91-101.