Comparison of biphasic and reordered fat suppression for dynamic breast MRI

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1293-1298

  Desmond, Kimberly L ^a   Ramsay, Elizabeth A ^a   Plewes, Donald B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

space ordering; Breast imaging; DCE MRI; Fat saturation; Fat suppression

Indexed keywords

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BREAST; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; BREAST; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 34249891603     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20921     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Brekelmans CT, Seynaeve C, Bartels CC, et al. Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:924-930.
2. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. Radiology 2002;225:165-175.
3. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:8469-8476.
4. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1095-1102.
5. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292:1317-1325.
6. Lee VS, Flyer MA, Weinreb JC, Krinsky GA, Rofsky NM. Image subtraction in gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1427-1432.
7. Schnabel JA, Tanner C, Castellano-Smith AD, et al. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2003;22:238-247.
8. Bottomley PA, Foster TH, Leue WM. In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging by selective irradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:6856-6860.
9. Meyer CH, Pauly JM, Macovski A, Nishimura DG. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 1990;15: 287-304.
10. Bydder GM, Steiner RE, Young IR, et al. Clinical NMR imaging of the brain: 140 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982;139:215-236.
11. Dixon WT. Simple proton spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 1984; 153:189-194.
12. Glover GH, Schneider E. Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1991;18:371-383.
13. Flask CA, Salem KA, Moriguchi H, Lewin JS, Wilson DL, Duerk JL. Keyhole Dixon method for faster, perceptually equivalent fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18:103-112.
14. Murray C, Muldoon J, Ramsay E, Plewes DB. Truncated fat saturation with elliptic centric k-space filling for contrast enhanced bilateral breast MRI. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Kyoto, Japan, 2004 (Abstract 38).
15. Hilfiker PR, Herfkens RJ, Heiss SG, Alley MT, Fleischmann D, Pelc NJ. Partial fat-saturated contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography compared with non-fat-saturated and conventional fat-saturated MR angiography. Radiology 2000;216:298-303.
16. Tkach JA, Lin W, Duda JJ, Haacke EM, Masaryk TJ. Optimizing three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with variable repetition time. Radiology 1994;191:805-811.
17. Greenman RL, Lenkinski RE, Schnall MD. Bilateral imaging using separate interleaved 3D volumes and dynamically switched multiple receive coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:108-115.
18. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3524-3531.
19. Larkman DJ, deSouza NM, Bydder M, Hajnal JV. An investigation into the use of sensitivity-encoded techniques to increase temporal resolution in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14:329-335.
20. Desmond K, Ramsay E, Plewes DB. k-Space ranking for optimal fat suppression in breast MRI. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Miami Beach, FL, USA, 2005 (Abstract 1850).