Keyhole Dixon method for faster, perceptually equivalent fat suppression

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 103-112

  Flask, Chris A ^a,b   Salem, Kyle A ^c   Moriguchi, Hisamoto ^a,b   Lewin, Jonathan S ^a   Wilson, David L ^a,b   Duerk, Jeffrey L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^b Case Western Reserve University   (United States)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dixon technique; Fat suppression; Image analysis; Off resonance correction; Perceptual difference model; Rapid MRI

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ARTICLE; BODY FAT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBIT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY;

ADIPOSE TISSUE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING;

EID: 0038110570     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10323     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Matthaei D, Haase A, Frahm J, Bomsdorf H, Vollmann W. Multiple chemical shift selective (CHESS) MR Imaging using stimulated echoes, Radiology 1986;160:791-794.
2. Meyer CH, Pauly JM, Macovski A, Nishimura DG. Simultaneous spatial and spectral selective excitation. Magn Reson Med 1990;15:287-304.
3. Thomasson D, Purdy D, Finn JP. Phase-modulated binomial RF pulses for fast spectrally-selective musculoskeletal imaging. Magn Reson Med 1996;35:563-568.
4. 0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:884-889,
5. Glover GH. Multipoint dixon technique for water and fat proton and susceptibility imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:521-530.
6. Zhang W, Goldhaber DM, Kramer DM. Separation of water and fat MR images in a single scan at .35 T using "sandwich" echoes. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:909-917.
7. van Vaals JJ, Brummer ME, Dixon WT, et al. "Keyhole" method for accelerating imaging of contrast agent uptake. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:671-675.
8. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wu DH. Application of keyhole imaging to interventional MRI: a simulation study to predict sequence requirements. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:918-924.
9. Hwang KP, Lim J, Wendt M, Merkle E, Lewin JS, Duerk JL. Improved device definition in interventional magnetic resonance imaging using a rotated stripes keyhole acquisition. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:554-560.
10. Jones RA, Haraldseth O, Muller TB, Rinck PA, Oksendal AN. K-space substitution: a novel dynamic imaging technique. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:830-834.
11. Spraggins TA. Simulation of spatial and contrast distortions in keyhole imaging. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:320-322,
12. Johnson JP, Said MR, Jared DA, Larimer JO, Gille JL, Lubin J. Perceptually optimized compression of digital mammograms. In: Chakraborty DP, Krupinski EA, editors. Image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment. Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press; 2002.
13. Oh J, Woolley SI, Arvanitis TN, Townend JN. A multistage perceptual quality assessment for compressed digital angiogram images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001;20:1352-1361.
14. Whiting JS, Eckstein M, Morioka C, Staffel BK, Eigler NL. Lossy image compression has insignificant effect on the accuracy and precision of quantitative coronary angiography. Circulation 1993:88:652-652.
15. Jackson WB, Said MR, Jared DA, Larimer JO, Gille JL, Lubin J. Evaluation of human visual models for predicting human-observer performance. In: Kundel H, editor. Image perception. Bellingham. WA: SPIE Press; 1997.
16. Johnson JP, Lubin J, Chakraborty DP, Nafziger J. Visual discrimination modeling of lesion detectability. In: Chakraborty DP. Krupinski EA, editors. Image perception, observer performance, and technology assessment, Bellingham. WA: SPIE Press; 2002,
17. Johnson JP, Lubin J, Krupinski EA, Peterson HA, Roehrig H, Baysinger A. Visual discrimination model for digital mammography. In: Krupinski EA, editor. Image perception and performance, Bellingham, WA: SPIE Press; 1999.
18. Lubin J. The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance, In: Watson A, editor. Digital images and human vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993. p 163-178.
19. Lubin J. A visual discrimination model for imaging system design and evaluation. In: Peli E, editor. Vision models for target detection and recognition. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific; 1995. p 245-283.
20. Salem KA, Lewin JS, Aschoff AJ, Duerk JL, Wilson DL. Validation of a human vision model for image quality evaluation of fast interventional magnetic resonance imaging. J Electronic Imaging 2001;11:224-235.
21. Daly S. The visual differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity. In: Watson AB, editor, Digital images and human vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1993. p 179-206.
22. Daly S. Method and apparatus for determining visually perceptible differences between images. Patent Num: 5394483. Feb 28 1995.
23. McCann JJ, McKee SP, Taylor TH. Quantitative studies in retinex theory: a comparison between theoretical predictions and observer responses to the "Color Mondrian" experiments, Vision Res 1976;16:445-458.
24. Mannos JL, Sakrison DJ. The effects of a visual fidelity criterion on the encoding of images. IEEE Trans Information Theory 1974;IT20:525-536.
25. Watson AB. The cortex transform: rapid computation of simulated neural images, Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 1987;39:311-327.
26. Norman RA, Baxter BS, Ravindra H, Anderton PJ. Photoreceptor contributions to contrast sensitivity: applications in radiological diagnosis. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1983;SMC-13:944-953.
27. Peli E. Contrast in complex images. J Opt Soc Am A 1990:7:2032-2040.
28. Martens J-B, Meesters L. Image dissimilarity. Signal Processing 1998;70:155-176.
29. Zaitsev M, Zilles K, Shah NJ. Shared k-space echo planar imaging with keyhole. Magn Reson Med 2001;45:109-117.
30. Parrish TB, Hu X. Hybrid technique for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:51-55.
31. Parrish T, Hu X. Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:326-336.
32. Chandra S, Liang ZP, Webb A, Lee H, Morris HD, Lauterbur PC. Application of reduced-encoding imaging with generalized-series reconstruction (RIGR) in dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:783-797.