The marginal impacts of CO2, CH4 and SF6 emissions

Climate Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 537-544

  Hope, Chris W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Impacts; Integrated assessment; Model; Multi gas; Social cost; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; METHANE; SULFUR COMPOUND;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34249817871     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685619     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albritton, D. L., and Meira Filho, L. G., 2001. “ Technical summary. ”. In Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis. IPCC Working Group I. Edited by:Houghton, J., Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
2. BP. 2005. Statistical Review of World Energy[available at:http://www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/globalbp_uk_english/publications/energy_reviews_2005/STAGING/local_assets/downloads/pdf/table_of_gas_prices_2005.pdf accessed June 2005]
3. Dagan, G., Agam, G., Krakov, V., and Kaplan, L., 2004. Carbon Membrane Separator for Elimination of SF6 Emissions from Gas-Insulated Electrical Utilities. Carbon Membranes Ltd, Rotem Industrial Park, D.N. Arava 86800, Israel [available at:www.epa.gov/highgwp/electricpower-sf6/pdf/daganpo.pdf accessed June 2005]
4. Defra. 2004. How the relative climate effects of greenhouse gases are compared[available at:http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/about/g-gases.htm accessed November 2006]
5. Hope, C., 2005. The climate change benefits of reducing methane emissions. Climatic Change, 68:21–39.
6. 2 from PAGE2002:an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC's five reasons for concern. Integrated Assessment, 6:1
7. IPCC. 2001a. Climate Change 2001:Impacts, Valuation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
8. IPCC. 2001b. Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
9. Kandlikar, M., 1995. On the relative role of greenhouse gases in abatement policies. Energy Policy, 23 (10):879–883.
10. Manne, A. S., and Richels, R. G., 2001. An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases. Nature, 410:675–677.
11. Morgan, M. G., and Dowlatabadi, H., 1996. Learning from integrated assessment of climate change. Climatic Change, 34 (3/4):337–368.
12. Plambeck, E. L., and Hope, C. W., 1995. Validation and Initial Results for the Updated PAGE Model. Research Papers in Management Studies 1994–1995 No 15. UK:University of Cambridge.
13. Plambeck, E. L., and Hope, C. W., 1996. PAGE95:An updated valuation of the impacts of global warming. Energy Policy, 24 (9):783–794.
14. Plambeck, E. L., Hope, C. W., and Anderson, J., 1997. The PAGE95 model:integrating the science and economics of global warming. Energy Economics, 19:77–101.
15. Nakicenovic, N., and Swart, R., eds. 2000. IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
16. Ramaswamy, V., 2001. “ Radiative forcing of climate change. ”. In Climate Change 2001:The Scientific Basis. IPCC Working Group I. Edited by:Houghton, J., Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
17. Schneider, S. H., 1997. Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2 (4):229–249.